TITLE

New York City Reconsiders A Surcharge Ban

AUTHOR(S)
Bruno, Maria
PUB. DATE
February 2001
SOURCE
Bank Technology News;Feb2001, Vol. 14 Issue 2, p41
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports that the New York City Council re-evaluated a plan for banning automated tellers surcharges. Criticisms leveled by the council against the fees; Cost of the surcharge.
ACCESSION #
4094636

 

Related Articles

  • Rise In ATM Fees Slows Down.  // Credit Union Journal;6/16/2003, Vol. 7 Issue 24, p16 

    Cites the slight increase in surcharges for non-customer users of automated teller machines (ATM) in 2002. Highlights of the U.S. Federal Reserve System's annual report on ATM fees; Comparison with fee increases in 2001; Increase in the average fee charged for bounced checks.

  • Small banks searching for ways around ATM fees. Roush, Matt // Crain's Detroit Business;05/26/97, Vol. 13 Issue 21, p3 

    No abstract available.

  • ATM surcharges. McAndrews, James J. // Current Issues in Economics & Finance;Apr98, Vol. 4 Issue 4, p1 

    Provides information on issue regarding surcharges on automated teller machine (ATM). Accounts on ATM networks and ATM fees; Advantage and disadvantages of ATM surcharges; Legislation on surcharges.

  • Selective Surcharging on the Rise. Gregg, Leigh // Credit Union Executive Journal;May/Jun99, Vol. 39 Issue 3, p25 

    Reports on the increase in the amount paid by consumers in automated teller machine (ATM) surcharges in 1997. How credit unions avoided surcharging; Projected growth of ATM transaction volume per year through 2001; Areas that are trying to ban surcharges; Opinion of bankers on surcharges.

  • D.C. Is Also Nation's Capital For Fees at Teller Machines.  // American Banker;7/23/1999, Vol. 164 Issue 140, p3 

    Reports that Washington, D.C. has the highest frequency of user fees for automated teller machines in the country according to the study findings of Moebs Services Inc. Comparison with user charges in other states; Range of automated teller surcharges in the area.

  • Despite Reverses, Foes of ATM Fees Keep Pushing. STOCK, HELEN // American Banker;2/10/2000, Vol. 165 Issue 28, p10 

    Focuses on the efforts of opponents of automated teller machines (ATM) user charges in the United States to boost anti-fees campaigns. Court petitions filed by opponents; Bills proposed to outlaw ATM surcharges.

  • Fed Study: Only a Slight Rise in ATM Surcharges.  // American Banker;6/9/2003, Vol. 168 Issue 109, p20 

    Reports that the cost of getting money at automated teller machines other than those affiliated with the financial institution of the consumer did not change much in 2002, according to a United States Federal Reserve study. Surcharge fees, which has risen in past years.

  • ATM Fee Disclosure Now Mandatory.  // Financial Update;Apr-Jun2001, Vol. 14 Issue 2, p5 

    Focuses on the rule issued by the United States Federal Reserve Board which will require automated teller machine operators to disclose information about fees.

  • Double ATM fees, triple trouble for consumers.  // Westchester County Business Journal;04/23/2001, Vol. 40 Issue 17, p20 

    Examines the impact of imposing a surcharge on noncustomers using automated teller machines (ATM) in the United States. Contribution to profits of ATM owners; Encouragement of the growth of bigger banks; Designation of the practice as anti-consumer and anti-competitive.

  • House panel would require ATM owners to disclose fees. Anason, Dean // American Banker;3/11/1999, Vol. 164 Issue 47, p2 

    Reports that the United States House Banking Committee has approved an amendment to require operators of automated teller machines to disclose user surcharge fees. Inclusion of the amendment in the financial reform legislation; Highlights of the deliberation results of the amendments.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics