TITLE

TREATIES, EXECUTION, AND ORIGINALISM IN Medell�n v. Texas, 128 S. Ct. 1346 (2008)

AUTHOR(S)
Geslison, Ben
PUB. DATE
March 2009
SOURCE
Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy;Spring2009, Vol. 32 Issue 2, p767
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article discusses treaties, execution and originalism in the case Medell�n v. Texas in the U.S. It notes a presumption that treaties are non-self-executing, instead of having a status of directly binding domestic federal law. A brief background of the case is also provided. Constitutionally mandated separation of powers is said to be preserved by the presumption while not reducing the primacy of such a law.
ACCESSION #
40625819

 

Related Articles

  • Onondaga Files Claim to 3,100 Square Miles.  // Native American Law Digest;Mar2005, Vol. 15 Issue 3, p10 

    This article reports that Onondaga Nation has filed a lawsuit claiming it owns 3,100 square miles of land in the state of New York. The lawsuit, filed in the Federal District Court in Syracuse, contends that the state illegally acquired the land in a series of treaties between 1788 and 1822....

  • The Availability Of Preliminary Remedies As A Reason To Arbitrate IP Disputes. Daniels, James E. // Dispute Resolution Journal;Nov2006-Jan2007, Vol. 61 Issue 4, p38 

    The article discusses the use of arbitration in intellectual property disputes. The author outlines three different scenarios involving unauthorized use of copyrighted materials and intellectual property. The rise of the Internet and the ease in which copyrighted materials can be transmitted...

  • Before You File Your Case.  // Filing Your Lawsuit in Federal Court: Pro Se Guide;2010, p1 

    The article offers a guide before filing a case in the U.S. federal court. Several ways are suggested to resolve a dispute outside court and some questions should be considered to make sure whether a case should be filed in federal court. The types of cases filed in federal court are those cases...

  • E-mail Becomes Fair Game in Federal Court. Swann, James // Community Banker;Jan2007, Vol. 16 Issue 1, p58 

    The article offers information on the amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure introduced on December 1, 2006 in the U.S., which allows requesting of electronic information for investigation purposes. The amendments allow discovery of electronically stored information like e-mails to...

  • Sending Fannie and Freddie the Bill.  // Governing;Sep2011, Vol. 24 Issue 12, p12 

    The article discusses the lawsuit against Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae related to their tax payments in the U.S. It mentions the claims of both agencies on government status, noting that they have cited a federal law which exempts them paying state and local taxes. It also tackles the views of...

  • Short arm of the law. Mongelluzzo, Bill // Journal of Commerce (1542-3867);1/15/2007, Vol. 8 Issue 2, p31 

    The article discusses the lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court in Sacramento, California by The Pacific Merchant Shipping Association against the California Air Resources Board (CARB). The PMSA lawsuit charges that CARB's 24-mile rule violates the U.N. Constitution's Commerce Clause, which...

  • AG asks Okla. high court to decide water case. Talley, Tim // Native American Times;2/17/2012, Vol. 18 Issue 7, p1 

    The article discusses a lawsuit filed February 10, 2012 by Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt on behalf of the Oklahoma Water Resources Board to his state's Supreme Court. The suit seeks a decision as to whether two Oklahoma-based American Indian tribes, the Choctaw and Chickasaw nations,...

  • PCAOB and the Persistence of the Removal Puzzle. Bellia, Patricia L. // George Washington Law Review;Jul2012, Vol. 80 Issue 5, p1371 

    In Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board ("PCAOB"), the Supreme Court invalidated a statutory provision protecting the tenure of members of the PCAOB, a board created to oversee the auditing of public companies subject to the securities laws. The case carried the...

  • DEFENDING U.S. SOVEREIGNTY, SEPARATION OF POWERS, AND FEDERALISM IN MEDELLÍN V. TEXAS. Cruz, Ted // Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy;Winter2010, Vol. 33 Issue 1, p25 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the State of Texas defended the U.S. sovereignty, separation of powers, and federalism in the case involving Jose Ernesto Medellin, who had been accused, convicted of a violent crime and sentenced to death. Medellin argued the enforcement of the U.S....

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics