TITLE

Reconciling Environmental Liability Standards after Iverson and Bestfoods

AUTHOR(S)
Reed, Joshua Safran
PUB. DATE
August 2000
SOURCE
Ecology Law Quarterly;2000, Vol. 27 Issue 3, p673
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Analyzes the potential implications of the decision on the United States (U.S.) versus Iverson case concerning environmental liability. Insight on the Iverson decision; Origin of the responsible corporate officer doctrine; Decision of the Supreme Court on the U.S. versus Bestfoods case; Impact of the decision on the implementation of the Clean Water Act.
ACCESSION #
4057472

 

Related Articles

  • United States v. Shell Oil Company: Is The Decision Too Lenient on the United States Government? Morita, Sachiko // Ecology Law Quarterly;2003, Vol. 30 Issue 3, p569 

    Examines the court's interpretation of the U.S. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act in the case, United States v. Shell Oil Co. Judicial treatment of the act; Factual background of the company; Implications of the court's decision.

  • New Ninth Circuit Decision Confirms that Parties Who Undertake Soil and Groundwater Cleanups Voluntarily or at the Request of State Agencies May Seek Recovery of Costs Via Superfund Lawsuits.  // Venulex Legal Summaries;2008 Q2, Special section p1 

    The article discusses the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on U.S. v. Atlantic Research Corp. concerning parties that undertake environmental investigations and cleanups without a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or court decree or judgment compelling them to...

  • CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.  // International Law Update;Jan2001, Vol. 7, p3 

    Reports the ruling on the allegations of United States national Jennifer K. Harbury regarding the attitude of the government concerning the death of husband Efrain Bamaca-Velasquez. Contention on the violation of the right to due process; Violation of the familial rights of Harbury by the...

  • Court Orders Damages Cut in Goodwill Lawsuit. Garver, Rob; Mandaro, Laura // American Banker;2/21/2001, Vol. 166 Issue 35, p3 

    Reports that a Washington federal appeals court has partially overturned a judgment against the government in a battle over regulatory goodwill. Appeals court's decision to return the case to federal claims court for a recalculation of damages; View of industry observers that the case filed by...

  • Land Into Trust Declared Constitutional.  // NARF Legal Review;Summer/Fall2005, Vol. 30 Issue 2, p10 

    Discusses the court decision in the case South Dakota versus United States which placed a property into trust for the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe under the Indian Reorganization Act. Allegations of the state; Affirmation of the constitutionality of Section 45 of the Act; Basis of the decision.

  • PROBING PARENTHESES. Seligman, Daniel // Fortune;11/1/1993, Vol. 128 Issue 11, p162 

    Examines the court case "National Treasury Employees Union, et al., v. United States of America, et al.," or the "parenthesis case." Overview of the Congressional passage of the 1989 "ethics reform" bill; Reaction of the bill passage in various groups including government unions; Ruling by...

  • Judgment tops $1.1 million in Wiretex pension case. Roos, Roberta M. // Fairfield County Business Journal;05/07/2001, Vol. 40 Issue 19, p2 

    Reports on the decision of the United States District Court in the lawsuit filed by the U.S. Department of Labor against Fairfield County, Connecticut-based metal fabrication company Wiretex Manufacturing Co. Inc. Total value of the court's default judgement; Allegations filed by the federal...

  • Supreme Court Cases of Interest. FREEMAN, CAROL GARFIEL // Criminal Justice;Winter2016, Vol. 30 Issue 4, p41 

    The article focuses on several criminal justice cases of the U.S. of October 2015 including Williams v. Pennsylvania, Taylor v. United States and Duncan v. Owens. Topics discussed include violation of Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments by the participation, separation of the Commonwealth of Puerto...

  • `Vanishing premium' verdict costs equitable $6.5M. Schmitt, Frederick // National Underwriter / Life & Health Financial Services;4/29/96, Vol. 100 Issue 18, p4 

    Reports that Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States was ordered to pay $6.5 million in compensatory and punitive damages to three Montana residents who were sold policies by former ELAS agent. Ruling made by District Judge John Warner; Why judge ruled against ELAS; Impact of...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics