AAMA v. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection

Caplan, Christina
August 2000
Ecology Law Quarterly;2000, Vol. 27 Issue 3, p621
Academic Journal
Describes the mobile source regulatory scheme under the Clean Air Act of the United States (U.S.) and examines circuit court decisions on state adoption of zero emission vehicle sales mandates. Description on the cases; Responses of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to the cases; Conclusion.


Related Articles

  • Emission Warranties Expanding. Heyler, Jack // Motor Age;Oct98, Vol. 117 Issue 10, p76 

    Reports on the expansion of emission warranty measures by the California Air Resources Board (ABR) and the United States Environmental Protection Agency. Objective of the measures; Reference to the 1990 US Clean Air Act Amendments and the California BAR '90 Smog Check legislation; Problems...

  • Washington watch.  // Automotive Marketing;Nov95, Vol. 24 Issue 11, p17 

    Reports on the Environmental Protection Agency's finalization of a new rule to provide states with more flexibility to design vehicle emission inspection programs (I/M). Establishment of an alternate, low-enhanced I/M performance standard; Provisions regarding testing, costs and repair.

  • California State Motor Vehicle and Nonroad Engine Pollution Control Standards; Truck Idling Requirements; Notice of Decision. McCarthy, Gina // Federal Register (National Archives & Records Service, Office of;02/16/2012, Vol. 77 Issue 32, p9239 

    The article presents information on a notice issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency regarding grant of request for a waiver of preemption and authorization to adopt and enforce California's Truck Idling Requirements made by the California Air Resources Board. It discusses the...

  • FINALLY FIGHTING EMISSIONS. Motavalli, Jim // E: The Environmental Magazine;Mar/Apr2009, Vol. 20 Issue 2, p32 

    The article discusses the move by U.S. President Barack Obama to sign an executive order directing the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to reconsider the refusal to let California and the states that follow its emissions standards to regulate greenhouse gases from automotive tailpipes....

  • Appeals Court Overrules EPA on Oxygenates. Sissell, Kara // Chemical Week;7/23/2003, Vol. 165 Issue 26, p8 

    Reports on the decision of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco, California, to overrule a decision made by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency that requires California to meet clean air standards. Information on the federal oxygenate requirement; Significance of the ruling;...

  • D.C. Circuit Separates Science from Policy in Upholding EPA Greenhouse-Gas Rules. Jordan III, William S. // Administrative & Regulatory Law News;Fall2012, Vol. 38 Issue 1, p25 

    In this article, the author discusses the decision of the circuit court of Washington, D.C. in the case Coalition for Responsible Regulation, Inc. v. EPA on June 26, 2012, in which the court upheld the attempt of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency at regulations governing greenhouse gases...

  • D.C. Circuit Clarifies Good Cause for Issuing Interim Final Rules Without Notice & Comment. Jordan III, William S. // Administrative & Regulatory Law News;Fall2012, Vol. 38 Issue 1, p23 

    In this article, the author discusses the decision of the Washington, D.C. circuit court in the case Mack Trucks, Inc. v. EPA, in which the court rejected the good cause argument of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for issuing an interim final rule without notice and comment. He mentions...

  • In Brief. Garrett, Theodore L. // Trends (15339556);Jan/Feb2014, Vol. 45 Issue 3, p25 

    The article presents decisions of courts on environmental protection cases in the U.S. The Seventh Circuit reversed its decision about the unlawful stormwater discharge of mining firm Flambeau Mining Co. The Eight Circuit uphold the rejection decision of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)...

  • Opinion: Supreme Court Gives Landowners A Victory. Marshall, Troy // Beef Expert Blog;3/30/2012, p13 

    The author discusses the ruling issued by the U.S. Supreme Court on the case Sackett v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) which involved home construction on alleged wetlands in Idaho.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics