TITLE

WHO'S REALLY RESPONSIBLE?

AUTHOR(S)
Maier, Emma
PUB. DATE
April 2009
SOURCE
Community Care;4/16/2009, Issue 1766, p4
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports that the Haringey Council of London, England, has dismissed an agency practitioner and suspended two staff social workers for inadequate handling of workloads after the Baby P case. The case involves a 17-month old boy who died after suffering injuries during which he was seen by social services. The three staff members have been accused of inadequate handling of 1,000 referrals. The author inquires whether the social workers were at fault or the problem was with the system.
ACCESSION #
40416430

 

Related Articles

  • Radecki v Kirklees Metropolitan Borough Council. Williams, Kate // Employers Law;Oct2008, p8 

    The article discusses the ruling of the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) of Great Britain on Radecki v Kirklees Metropolitan Borough Council (MBC) in West Yorkshire, England. Radecki was a teacher employed by Kirklees MBC who was suspended while concerns about his performance were investigated....

  • McCormick v Short Brothers.  // Employers Law;Jul2010, p9 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the Northern Irish Court of Appeal overturned the decision of the Employment Tribunal (ET) that Steven McCormick was unfairly dismissed by Short Brothers based on his low marking on attitude, saying that it had substituted its own view for that of the...

  • Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis v Buchanan.  // Employers Law;Oct2010, p9 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the Employment Appeal Tribunal held that the process for penalty notice disposal was flawed and the British Metropolitan Police made an unfair dismissal of a certain Miss Buchanan.

  • Watkins v Jeanette Crouch t/a Temple Bird Solicitors.  // Employers Law;Nov2010, p9 

    The article discusses the case, Watkins v. Jeanette Crouch t/a Temple Bird Solicitors, wherein an employee complained about the company's selection process for her dismissal for redundancy.

  • Avoiding Christmas clangers. Rushton, Sarah // Employers Law;Dec2007, p26 

    The article offers Christmas-related advice to employers in Great Britain. The Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents (RoSPA) warns employees and executives against dancing on desks. The case Judge v. Crown Leisure Ltd. shows that employers should avoid telling employees that they will be...

  • Aberdeen City Council v McNeill. Samuel, Helen; Bridges, Anna // Employers Law;Jun2010, p8 

    The article discusses the British Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) ruling revoking the employment tribunal's decision to award 26,029 pounds sterling to Tom McNeill for his constructive dismissal claim against the Aberdeen City Council in Scotland.

  • Fair dismissal after conflicting evidence about medical condition.  // Employers Law;Sep2010, p6 

    The article discusses the court case of Browning v. Sita UK Ltd. wherein the British labor tribunal ruled in favor of Sita who dismissed an employee for gross misconduct after presenting conflicting evidences about his medical condition.

  • Mechanic unfairly dismissed on the spot contrary to Acas code.  // Employers Law;Sep2010, p6 

    The article discusses the court case Vickery v. Kars of Tiverton Ltd. wherein the British employment tribunal increased the amount of compensation awarded to an unfairly dismissed employee due to the employer's failure to comply with the Acas code of practice.

  • John Duffy McCormack v Hamilton Academical Football Club Ltd.  // Employers Law;Oct2010, p9 

    The article discusses the court case John Duffy McCormack v. Hamilton Football Club Ltd. wherein a football club assistant manager in Great Britain won a claim for damages for being dismissed without notice.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics