TITLE

LEGAL CHECKLIST

PUB. DATE
March 2009
SOURCE
People Management;3/12/2009, Vol. 15 Issue 6, p37
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
This section presents court cases related to employment. In Osborne Clarke Services v Purohit, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) held that the company made an indirect race discrimination when the plaintiff was not allowed to apply because he has no work permit in Great Britain. In Matuszowicz v Kingston Upon Hull City Council, the Court of Appeal had to decide about a three-month time limit under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995. Violation of dignity and racial harassment to an employee were the main topic in Richmond Pharmacology v Dhaliwal.
ACCESSION #
40399650

 

Related Articles

  • Ms K D Weeks v Newham College of Further Education.  // Employers Law;Sep2012, p9 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the British Employment Appeal Tribunal dismissed claims by the claimant for sexual harassment, victimization and whistleblowing against the college under the Sex Discrimination Act, in Ms. K D Weeks v. Newham College of Further Education.

  • COSTS AND AGE DISCRIMINATION.  // Accountancy;May2012, Vol. 148 Issue 1425, p63 

    This article discusses the Great Britain Employment Appeal Tribunal court case of Woodcock vs. Cumbria Primary Care Trust, which addressed the potential legality of age discrimination in cases where the actions were a proportionate means to rectifying a legitimate business concern.

  • Dumfries and Galloway Council v North and others.  // Employers Law;Jul/Aug2009, p9 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the British Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) considered the issue of whether a claimant in an equal pay claim can show that she is in the same employment as a man who is employed by the same employer at a different establishment and works in a different...

  • Lies, damn lies and tribunal claims. Finley, Sarah; Nettle, Stephen // Employers Law;Jul/Aug2009, p14 

    This article discusses the Daleside Nursing Home v. Mrs. C. Mathew case handled by the Employment Appeals Tribunal (EAT). According to the EAT ruling, the central allegation is a lie that she deliberately fabricated to support a weak claim. The claimant alleged that she was called a black bitch...

  • EBR Attridge Law LLP (formerly Attridge Law) and anor v Coleman.  // Employers Law;Dec2009/Jan2010, p9 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the British Employment Appeal Tribunal ruled that a claim may be filed by employees being discriminated or harassed due to their association with a disabled person. In EBR Attridge Law LLP (formerly Attridge Law) and Anor v. Coleman, EBR Attridge Law...

  • Child Support Agency (Dudley) v Truman and Countrywide Estate Agents & others v Rice.  // Employers Law;Mar2009, p8 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the Employment Appeal Tribunal in Great Britain has confirmed that the decision by the House of Lords on disability discrimination which made it much harder for people with disabilities to bring disability discrimination claims, also applies to...

  • Stuart Peters Ltd v Bell.  // Employers Law;Mar2009, p9 

    The article discusses several court cases related to employment in Great Britain. The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) ruled that an employee who is constructively and unfairly dismissed without notice does not have to offset earnings received from new employment during what would have been...

  • IN BRIEF.  // Employers Law;May2009, p8 

    This section presents several court cases related to employment. In Berr v Neufeld & Howe, the Court of Appeal held that a shareholder and director of a company can also be an employee under a contract of employment. The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) claimed that in Clearsprings Management v...

  • Untitled. Wynn-Evans, Charles // Personnel Today;9/29/2009, p4 

    In this article, the author discusses the recovery of costs from claimants who lie during the employment tribunal litigations in Great Britain. He believes that the cost awarded in such litigation are limited and refers to the two Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) cases Dunedin (Canmore) Housing...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics