Spam Legislation Up First In 107th Congress

Vaughan, Allyson
January 2001
Wireless Week;01/22/2001, Vol. 7 Issue 4, p15
Trade Publication
Focuses on the proposed Wireless Telephone Spam Protection Act in the United States Congress. Aim of the proposed legislation; Significance of the proposed legislation to the promotion of consumer privacy; Terms of the proposed legislation.


Related Articles

  • New Law Cans Spam.  // Association Management;Feb2004, Vol. 56 Issue 2, p9 

    Reports on the passage of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003, the first federal restrictions on unsolicited commercial e-mail in the U.S. Implementation of law and defining commercial electronic mail message; Exemptions of the provisions of the law; Regulation of e-mails that are commercial in nature.

  • The law is tightening up on the spammers. Marsden, Nicola // Marketing Week;6/26/2003, Vol. 26 Issue 26, p28 

    Reports on initiatives in Great Britain to regulate unsolicited junk e-mails. Proposed legislation by Labour member of parliament (MP) Paul Flynn; 'Spam Summit' organized by MPs; Implementation of the European Commission's Directive on Privacy and Electronic Communications by October 31, 2003;...

  • By the numbers.  // njbiz;12/1/2014, Vol. 27 Issue 48, p1 

    The article reveals the proposed fine for first-time offenders of the Do Not Mail law that prohibits the sending of junk electronic mail to a New Jersey resident.

  • WHAT DO I (AND MY CLIENTS) NEED TO KNOW ABOUT CANADA'S NEW ANTI-SPAM LAW? Kember, Lisa // CA Magazine;Nov2011, Vol. 144 Issue 9, p7 

    No abstract available.

  • Calif. anti-spam law called excessive. Garretson, Cara // Network World;9/29/2003, Vol. 20 Issue 39, p12 

    Reports on criticism on the anti-spam law in California. Provisions of the Senate Bill 186; Negative impact on legitimate businesses looking to communicate to customers with customers. INSET: California's answer to spam.

  • Spam Bill's Bad Taste. Fixmer, Rob // Inter@ctive Week;06/19/2000, Vol. 7 Issue 24, p6 

    Offers a personal view on the Unsolicited Electronic Email Act passed by the United States House. How the freedom of speech is being affected by the passage of the act.

  • Judiciary Committee Marks Up Spam Legislation.  // Association Management;Jul2001, Vol. 53 Issue 7, p9 

    Reports that the United States House Judiciary Committee is expected to report out an anti-electronic mail spam bill to replace the House of Representatives (HR) bill 718. Concerns of the business community on the HR 718.

  • No spam for Des Moines.  // Marketing News;06/07/99, Vol. 33 Issue 12, Honomichl 1999 p30 

    Reports on the approval by the Des Moines, Iowa Legislature of restrictions on unsolicited e-mail or `spam.' Purpose of the restrictions; Remarks from Chris Rants (R-Sioux City) about the measure.

  • WHAM BAM, NO THANK YOU SPAM.  // New Zealand Management;Jun2012, Vol. 59 Issue 5, p5 

    The article discusses legal action by New Zealand's Department of Internal Affairs' Anti-Spam Compliance Unit against an alleged spammer under the Unsolicited Electronic Messages Act of 2007.

  • SPAM SLAM.  // Entrepreneur;Dec2003, Vol. 31 Issue 12, p101 

    Reports on regulations in California that bans unsolicited commercial electronic mail messages sent from the state or to any of its residents. Anti-spam measure in the state; Effectivity of the law starting January 1, 2004.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics