TITLE

THE "SILVER PLATTER" IN THE CONTEXT OF STATE CONSTITUTIONAL ADJUDICATION

AUTHOR(S)
McGuinness, Martin
PUB. DATE
November 2008
SOURCE
Albany Law Review;2008, Vol. 71 Issue 4, p1241
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The author discusses the Silver Platter doctrine in the context of state constitutional adjudication. He states that under the doctrine, state agents would procure evidence against a defendant that federal agents would otherwise be unable to obtain themselves because of the limitations enforced against them by the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and the exclusionary rule. He also discusses several cases wherein he analyzed how the court decided the admissibility issue.
ACCESSION #
40089102

 

Related Articles

  • Davis and the Good Faith Exception: Pushing Exclusion to Extinction? de Golian, Eleanor // Mercer Law Review;Winter2012, Vol. 63 Issue 2, p751 

    The article discusses the effects of unlawful searches and faithfulness to the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. constitution. It informs about the creation of exclusionary rule by the U.S. Supreme Court, which obliges lower courts to exclude evidences from illegal searches. In Davis v. United...

  • REVISITING INS V. LOPEZ-MENDOZA: WHY THE FOURTH AMENDMENT EXCLUSIONARY RULE SHOULD APPLY IN DEPORTATION PROCEEDINGS. Rossi, Elizabeth A. // Columbia Human Rights Law Review;Winter2013, Vol. 44 Issue 2, p477 

    The U.S. Supreme Court's justification for its holding in INS v. Lopez-Mendoza rests on flawed intellectual ground and should therefore be reexamined and overturned. The Supreme Court held in 1984 that the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule "need not apply" in deportation proceedings. It reached...

  • DEBUNKING FIVE GREAT MYTHS ABOUT THE FOURTH AMENDMENT EXCLUSIONARY RULE. MILHIZER, EUGENE R. // Military Law Review;Spring2012, Vol. 211, p211 

    The article discusses several reported myths associated with the exclusionary rule of evidence which is contained in the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution as of March 2012, focusing on the probable cause doctrine and an American citizen's right to be free from unreasonable searches and...

  • In Defense of the EXCLUSIONARY RULE. Lynch, Timothy // USA Today Magazine;Jul99, Vol. 128 Issue 2650, p22 

    Discusses the fourth amendment to the United States constitution. Content of the fourth amendment; Debate over the exclusionary rule in the amendment.

  • DODGE CITY AND THE FOURTH AMENDMENT. Seligman, Daniel; de Llosa, Patty // Fortune;3/20/1995, Vol. 131 Issue 5, p142 

    Comments on the House Republicans' Taking Back Our Streets Act, which would severely limit application of the so-called exclusionary rule--the rule that says evidence must be excluded in court when the police have acquired it improperly. How critics of the Republican bill are exaggerating when...

  • The New Exclusionary Rule Cases. Fitzhugh, John // ABA Journal;Mar1984, Vol. 70 Issue 3, p58 

    Discusses the proposal to modify the exclusion rule for criminal trial evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. U.S. Supreme Court cases on the adoption, extension and possible modification of the exclusionary rule; Pressure from prosecutors,...

  • Cost/benefit analysis in search and seizure rulings. Daly, Joseph L. // ABA Journal;Nov84, Vol. 70 Issue 11, p110 

    Looks at several Fourth Amendment cases in the United States Supreme Court. Exclusionary rule cases of Mapp v. Ohio, United States v. Leon and Massachusetts v. Sheppard; Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Lopez-Mendoza; Home protection cases of United States v. Katz and Welsh v....

  • Taking the Fourth . . . Apart? Reidinger, Paul // ABA Journal;Dec89, Vol. 75 Issue 12, p80 

    Reports on United States cases concerning the Fourth Amendment. U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit's ruling that a drunk-driving suspect who was pinned to the floor while a blood sample was drawn from his arm was not subjected to an unreasonable seizure; U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd...

  • Hudson v. Michigan and the Future of Fourth Amendment Exclusion. Tomkovicz, James J. // Iowa Law Review;7/1/2008, Vol. 93 Issue 5, p1819 

    The author focuses on the impact of the U.S. Supreme Court case Hudson versus Michigan on the future of the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule. The case relates to the violation of police officers of the knock-and-announce rule when they came to the house of Booker T. Hudson in Michigan. He...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics