AFMA's Furnpac gives $376,000 in 2 election cycles

Welch, Rupert
January 2001
Furniture/Today;01/15/2001, Vol. 25 Issue 19, p72
Trade Publication
Reports the contribution of furniture manufacturers to political candidates and committees during elections according to Federal Election Commission in the United States. Recipients of the contribution; Committee responsible for collections; Intention of the associations for contributing.


Related Articles

  • Campaign finance blues. Mann, Thomas E. // Brookings Review;Summer96, Vol. 14 Issue 3, p45 

    Focuses on campaign finance reform in the United States. Need for clean up the role of money in American elections; Deficiencies of the system; Conflicts of interest; Failure to generate enough information about the choice of candidates.

  • Campaign finance reform: Dead on arrival? Mann, Thomas E. // Brookings Review;Spring97, Vol. 15 Issue 2, p3 

    Opinion. Presents the author's view on the fundraising issue of the Clinton administration during the advertising campaign of 1995 in the 105th Congress. Legitimate concerns of the issue; Two developments that are prerequisite if the reforms happened in the 105th Congress; Reforms proposed by...

  • If pols listen, they'll hear clamor for finance reform. Netsch, Dawn Clark // Crain's Chicago Business;07/14/97, Vol. 20 Issue 28, p11 

    Opinion. Looks at the way the public of Chicago, Illinois, views the issue of campaign finance reform. What have motivated the public; Reference to environmental issues in 1960; Names of other states that are concerned about the issue of campaign reform.

  • True reform: Blind trusts for political contributions. Nowland, James D. // Crain's Chicago Business;01/12/98, Vol. 21 Issue 2, p11 

    Opinion. States that campaign finance reforms have been no match for aggressive politicians in search of campaign cash. Information on reasons why people contribute to campaigns.

  • `Should the Campaign Cost Reduction and Reform Act of 1990 Be Approved?' PRO.  // Congressional Digest;Oct90, Vol. 69 Issue 10, p236 

    Argues for the approval of H.R. 5400, the Campaign Cost Reduction and Reform Act of 1990 with floor speeches by US Representatives Al Swift, David R. Obey, Matthew F. McHugh, Howard Wolpe, Jim Moody and David E. Price

  • `Should the Campaign Cost Reduction and Reform Act of 1990 Be Approved?' CON.  // Congressional Digest;Oct90, Vol. 69 Issue 10, p237 

    Argues against the passage of H.R. 5400, the Campaign Cost Reduction and Reform Act of 1990, with floor speeches by US Representatives Robert H. Michel, Bill Frenzel, William M. Thomas, Pat Roberts, Steve Gunderson and Dean A. Gallo.

  • Current federal campaign finance laws.  // Congressional Digest;Mar1992, Vol. 71 Issue 3, p69 

    Presents excerpts from and highlights of the Federal Election Campaign Act, taken from `The FEC and the Federal Campaign Finance Law,' a Federal Election Commission publication. Looks at public financing, requirements for report filing, contribution limits and independent expenditures.

  • 1990 congressional campaign spending.  // Congressional Digest;Mar1992, Vol. 71 Issue 3, p71 

    Offers a look at congressional election spending for 1990 races, which at $445 million is the lowest in six years. Shows the financial activity of winning candidates for races dating back to 1975-76.

  • Should the campaign spending limit and election reform act be approved?  // Congressional Digest;Mar1992, Vol. 71 Issue 3, p78 

    Presents speeches in favor of approving HR 3750, the House of Representatives Campaign Spending Limit and Election Reform Act of 1991. Speeches by Representatives Charlie Rose (D-N.C.), David E. Price (D-N.C.), Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.), Charles A. Hayes (D-Ill.), Samuel Gejdensen (D-Conn.)...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics