TITLE

Yick Wo v. Hopkins: 1886

AUTHOR(S)
Christianson, Stephen G.
PUB. DATE
October 2003
SOURCE
Great American Trials;2003, p192
SOURCE TYPE
Book
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article discusses a court case wherein the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the conviction of the appellant Yick Wo for violating an ordinance was unconstitutional. The trial was conducted in Washington, D.C. in 1886. Wo claimed that the city of San Francisco, California was enforcing an ordinance in an unlawfully discriminatory manner against him and other Chinese persons. The need to enforce the law in a fair manner is cited as the significance of the case.
ACCESSION #
39251976

 

Related Articles

  • Yick Wo v. Hopkins.  // Supreme Court Cases: Re-establishing Order (1864-1930);1999, pN.PAG 

    Presents the case Yick Wo v. Hopkins argued before the United States Supreme Court. Opening statements; Decision of the Court; Closing comments by judges.

  • Recent Development: Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District Number One v. Holder. Adams, Randall T. // Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review;Winter2010, Vol. 45 Issue 1, p135 

    The article discusses the U.S. Supreme Court case Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District Number One v. Holder (NAMUDNO) about the constitutionality of the 2006 reauthorization of the Voting Right Act of 1965 (VRA). The ruling reportedly did not affect Section 5, which sets a preclearance...

  • Supreme Court Cases 2008-2009 Term. Baker, Lisa A. // FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin;Oct2009, Vol. 78 Issue 10, p21 

    The article discusses several court cases decided by the U.S. Supreme Court for the 2008-2009 term which pertains to fundamental principles of criminal procedure. It presents the Montejo v. Louisiana case which addresses aspects of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. It looks into the civil...

  • Will Affirmative Action disappear? Malveaux, Julianne // Michigan Citizen;6/24/2012, Vol. 34 Issue 33, p7 

    The article offers the author's insights regarding the approach of the U.S. Supreme Court to dismantle the affirmative action provisions concerning race discrimination cases in the U.S.

  • Supreme court upholds Michigan ban on affirmative action.  // Arab American News;4/26/2014, Vol. 30 Issue 1472, p18 

    The article focuses on the affirmation of the U.S. Supreme court of a Michigan law that aims to eliminate the use of racial preferences in university admission practices.

  • Marginal Whiteness. Rich, Camille Gear // California Law Review;Oct2010, Vol. 98 Issue 5, p1497 

    The article explores the interracial solidarity doctrine which relates to racial discrimination legal issues in the U.S. It tackles the interracial solidarity lawsuit filed by Betty Clayton when she and her black coworker were refused by the White Hall District of a nonresidency privilege. It...

  • Federal Courts and the Communicative Value of Visual Art: Is an Intended Message Required for Strong Protection of Rights Under the First Amendment? Leichtman, David; Bhatt, Avani // Federal Lawyer;Sep2011, Vol. 58 Issue 8, p25 

    The article presents cases which identify the role of courts in preventing art as expression in the U.S. In Ward v. Rock Against Racism, the court ruled that music, as a form of communication and expression, is protected under the First Amendment. In Kaplan v. California, the court held that the...

  • Court calls it 'nonsensical': Prejudice against the prejudiced isn't covered discrimination.  // HR Specialist: North Carolina Employment Law;Jul2010, Vol. 4 Issue 7, p3 

    The article discusses a court case wherein a group of black teachers files a case for the City of New York Department of Education because of anti-Caribbean discrimination and the court dismiss the lawsuits.

  • Firm Against Evasion.  // Time;6/13/1969, Vol. 93 Issue 24, p68 

    The article focuses on the determination of the U.S. Supreme Court to address racial injustice in the country. It notes that the court responded firmly against any efforts to evade its pronouncements or laws against discrimination. It highlights three cases including the quota system of at least...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics