Democracy Works

November 2000
Scholastic News -- Edition 4;11/15/2000, Vol. 63 Issue 9, p4
Focuses on the significance of the Constitution in the 2000 presidential election in the United States.


Related Articles

  • Political Judgments. Issacharoff, Samuel // University of Chicago Law Review;Summer2001, Vol. 68 Issue 3, p637 

    Explores issues surrounding the United States Supreme Court's involvement in the 2000 presidential election dispute in spite of its abandonment of the political question doctrine. Factors attributed to the successful evasion of the political question barrier to judicial review; Discussion on...

  • Two-and-a-Half Cheers for Bush v Gore. McConnell, Michael W. // University of Chicago Law Review;Summer2001, Vol. 68 Issue 3, p657 

    Explores legal issues surrounding the United States Supreme Court's decision in the 2000 presidential election. Provisions of the Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution; Litigation rounds over the election case; Key problem with the court's decision; Potential outcomes of a...

  • In Defense of Constitutional Democracy. Kesler, Charles R. // Human Events;12/01/2000, Vol. 56 Issue 44, pS3 

    Comments on the impact of the results of the 2000 United States (U.S.) presidential election on the U.S. allegiance to the Constitution and the framework of the republican government. Role of the Electoral College in constitutionalism and rule of law; Criticisms on the Democratic Party's efforts...

  • Opposite Day. Cahill, Virginia // Foundry Management & Technology;Jan2001, Vol. 129 Issue 1, p4 

    Comments on controversy over results of the November 2000 presidential elections in the United States. Reaffirmation of the Constitution and the country's entire system of checks and balances; Presidential candidate Al Gore's legal right to pursue his options; Absence of a moral right to take...

  • WHY THE BUSH V. GORE DECISION WAS CORRECT. Kaplan, Morton A. // World & I;Jun2001, Vol. 16 Issue 6, p292 

    Examines the factors showing why the majority decision in the case of George W. Bush versus Al Gore, regarding the counting of ballots in Florida during the 2000 United States presidential election, was correct. Judicial lawmaking; Constitutional meaning; Analysis of the problem in Florida;...

  • Presidents, Congress, and Courts: Partisan Passions in Motion. Appleby, Joyce // Journal of American History;Sep2001, Vol. 88 Issue 2, p408 

    Analyzes the 2000 presidential election in the United States. Expectations and assumptions brought to the writing of Article II by the delegates to the Constitutional Convention; Assessment on how political parties have played havoc with the Constitution and the independence of the president;...

  • Red Queen rules. Barone, Michael // U.S. News & World Report;12/18/2000, Vol. 129 Issue 24, p32 

    Addresses the judicial process, especially the role thereof in the 2000 United States presidential election between Al Gore and George W. Bush. Perception that rules are often ignored, deadlines are changed and laws are written at will; Thoughts on the two key decisions that the Florida Supreme...

  • Supreme Court Upholds State Legislatures' Constitutional Role. Charen, Mona // Insight on the News;01/01/2001, Vol. 17 Issue 1, p46 

    Criticizes the Supreme Court of Florida for its actions on the ballot dispute for the 2000 United States (U.S.) presidential elections. How the state Supreme Court supported Al Gore in his efforts to change the election rules; Impact of the actions taken by the Supreme Court on the U.S....

  • Concede, Loser.  // Human Events;11/17/2000, Vol. 56 Issue 42, p1 

    Discusses the implication of presidential candidate Al Gore's persistence for a recount in Palm Beach, Florida to the Constitution and the rule of law of the United States (U.S.) with regard to the November 2000 presidential election. Status of the political career of Gore; Impact of the...


Read the Article

Other Topics