Cameras May Yet Cover the Supremes

Daniels, Edward F.
November 2000
Multichannel News;11/20/2000, Vol. 21 Issue 47, p84
Focuses on the issue of television coverage of proceedings in the United States Supreme Court. Introduction of a bill by senators; Precedent in the 9th Circuit's allowing of Internet streaming of oral arguments in a court challenge by AT&T Corp.; Attitude of justices toward electronic media coverage.


Related Articles

  • TV judges on cameras: Roll 'em. Brodesser, Claude // MediaWeek;11/24/97, Vol. 7 Issue 44, p24 

    Presents comments regarding the television coverage of courtroom proceedings in the United States. Titles of television programs featuring courtroom proceedings to be launched in 1998; Comments on judges who close the courts to the press.

  • Supreme TV Stars? Eggerton, John // Broadcasting & Cable;10/3/2005, Vol. 135 Issue 40, p29 

    Reports on a bill introduced by Senator Arlen Specter (R-Pa.) in 2005 that would permit television cameras in open Supreme Court sessions in the U.S.

  • THE WEEK THAT WAS.  // Broadcasting & Cable;9/10/2001, Vol. 131 Issue 38, p21 

    Reports developments related to television broadcasting in the United States as of September 2001. Program rating of the match between Andre Agassi and Pete Sampras; Number of Emmy Awards received by CBS; Lawsuit filed by Court TV against the New York state for the statute banning cameras in...

  • Straight from the U.S. high court--almost. McClintock, Pamela // Variety;12/04/2000, Vol. 381 Issue 3, p6 

    Discusses the television broadcast of the court proceedings held by the United States Supreme Court regarding the 2000 presidential election conflict. Production of the television networks CNN and MSNBC; Information on the audio tape copies of the proceedings; Efforts of news executives to...

  • Justices reject appeal to bring cable caps back. Boliek, Brooks // Hollywood Reporter -- International Edition;12/4/2001, Vol. 371 Issue 8, p4 

    Reports the rejection of the Supreme Court on the appeal made by cable companies in the U.S. Claims of the cable operators on the freedom of speech violation; Authorization of the Federal Communications Commission on the regulation of cable companies reach; Justification of the provision on...

  • Oral Report: Cable Permeates Supreme Court Debate About Broadcast Decency Restrictions.  // Multichannel News;1/16/2012, Vol. 33 Issue 3, p4 

    The article reports on the U.S. Supreme Court's discussion regarding indecent content on television and the role of cable television in it as it is not restricted by indecency rules.

  • HIGH COURT APPROVES 'CARRY ALL' REGS.  // Variety;6/24/2002, Vol. 387 Issue 6, p4 

    Reports the approval of the U.S. Supreme Court on a federal law that requires satcasters to carry all local broadcasting signals in the country.

  • Preemptions hurt syndicated fare. Benson, Jim // Variety;7/18/94, Vol. 355 Issue 11, p21 

    Reports that preemptions by the O.J. Simpson preliminary hearing have hurt the television broadcasting industry in the United States for the week that ended July 3, 1994. Decline in Nielsen ratings of programs; Improvement in Paramount's `Star Trek' rating.

  • TV or not TV. Albiniak, Paige // Broadcasting & Cable;1/14/2002, Vol. 132 Issue 2, p19 

    Focuses on the efforts of cable television networks Court TV and C-Span to gain approval for the coverage of terrorist trial in the United States. Reason of the networks for insisting television coverage of the trial; Concerns on the effects of the coverage on court proceedings; Worries on the...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics