Mullins Sr., Morell E.
September 2000
Albany Law Review;2000, Vol. 64 Issue 1, p9
Academic Journal
Examines the subjects of strict and liberal construction in cases involving statutory construction. Discussion on the pervasiveness, pedigree and surface of strict and liberal construction; Relation of strict and liberal construction to the literal wording of statutes and to the implications and inferences of language itself; Nature of strict and liberal construction and way in which they are used.


Related Articles

  • THE ONE-CONGRESS FICTION IN STATUTORY INTERPRETATION. Buzbee, William W. // University of Pennsylvania Law Review;Nov2000, Vol. 149 Issue 1, p171 

    Presents a critique that raises questions about the normative claims underpinning the textualist modes of statutory interpretations in the United States Congress. Role of textualism in enhancing the quality of legislation; Advantages of a more context-sensitive method of interpretation that...

  • Statutory Interpretation. Gifford, Donald // Legaldate;Mar2004, Vol. 16 Issue 1, p5 

    Presents information on statutory interpretation. Rules that need to be interpreted by the courts; General rules of statutory interpretation; Consequences if two pieces of legislation conflict.

  • DELEGATION REALLY RUNNING RIOT. Alexander, Larry; Prakash, Saikrishna // Virginia Law Review;Jun2007, Vol. 93 Issue 4, p1035 

    The article examines certain problems regarding the structure and statutes of conventional delegations in the U.S. The positive theory offered by the accounts of conventional delegations is taken into account. Key information about the provision of the Article I, Section 8 of the statutory...

  • What's New in the Law. Ashman, Allan // American Bar Association Journal;Oct81, Vol. 67 Issue 10, p1372 

    Presents cases illustrating the application of various laws in the United States. Statute in Oregon on malpractice; Application of principles of agency and fiduciary law according to the California Court of Appeal; Political terminations of governmental employees.

  • Legal Malpractice Statutes Of Limitation: Overview And Pennsylvania Case Study. Christof II, Joseph S. D.; Farrar, Brett W.; Flynn, Michael P. // Defense Counsel Journal;Oct2010, Vol. 77 Issue 4, p485 

    The article presents a case study of legal malpractice statutes of limitation in Pennsylvania. In legal malpractice actions in the state, the plaintiff is allowed to assert claims in negligence, contract or both. A legal malpractice claim is permitted to be asserted and sustained beyond the time...

  • THE ROLE OF STATUTORY INTERPRETATION IN LAW-MAKING THROUGH THE COURTS. Corbin, Lillian // Legaldate;May2007, Vol. 19 Issue 2, p1 

    In this article, the author examines the role of statutory interpretation in law making through the courts in Australia. The author discusses a number of reasons why someone might want to persuade the court to their way of understanding the words contained in statutes. She believes that the most...

  • HOW TO CONSTRUE A HYBRID STATUTE. Marx, Jonathan // Virginia Law Review;Mar2007, Vol. 93 Issue 1, p235 

    The article discusses the interpretation of a hybrid statute. It has been said that hybrid statutes should be interpreted consistently and evenhandedly, and its construction should be regarded as part of a stature's plain meaning. terms. By minimizing or eliminating the distinction between civil...

  • Admissibility and Use by the United States Supreme Court of Extrinsic Aids in Constitutional Construction. tenBroek, Jacobus // California Law Review;Mar1938, Vol. 26 Issue 3, p287 

    Examines the admissibility and use by the U.S. Supreme Court of extrinsic aids in constitutional construction. General theory of constitutional interpretation; Comparison between the problem involved in statutory construction and that involved in constitutional construction; Concept of...

  • But That Is Absurd! WHY SPECIFIC ABSURDITY UNDERMINES TEXTUALISM. Jellum, Linda D. // Brooklyn Law Review;Spring2011, Vol. 76 Issue 3, p917 

    The article focuses on the absurdity doctrine or the strict interpretation of a law to the point of violating common sense. It explores the difference between specific and general absurdity as applied to the facts of a particular case. It points out how this distinction has been left unnoticed...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics