Improved generation of rat gene knockouts by target-selected mutagenesis in mismatch repair-deficient animals

van Boxtel, Ruben; Toonen, Pim W.; Verheul, Mark; van Roekel, Henk S.; Nijman, Isaac J.; Guryev, Victor; Cuppen, Edwin
January 2008
BMC Genomics;2008, Vol. 9, Special section p1
Academic Journal
Background: The laboratory rat (Rattus norvegicus) is one of the preferred model organisms in physiological and pharmacological research, although the availability of specific genetic models, especially gene knockouts, is limited. N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU)-driven target-selected mutagenesis is currently the most successful method in rats, although it is still very laborious and expensive. Results: As ENU-induced DNA damage is normally recognized by the mismatch repair (MMR) system, we hypothesized that the effectiveness of the target-selected mutagenesis approach could be improved by using a MMR-deficient genetic background. Indeed, Msh6 knockout rats were found to be more sensitive to ENU treatment and the germ line mutation rate was boosted more than two-fold to 1 mutation per 585 kb. In addition, the molecular mutation spectrum was found to be changed in favor of generating knockout-type alleles by ~20%, resulting in an overall increase in efficiency of ~2.5 fold. The improved effectiveness was demonstrated by high throughput mutation discovery in 70 Mb of sequence in a set of only 310 mutant F1 rats. This resulted in the identification of 89 mutations of which four introduced a premature stopcodon and 64 resulted in amino acid changes. Conclusion: Taken together, we show that the use of a MMR-deficient background considerably improves ENU-driven target-selected mutagenesis in the rat, thereby reducing animal use as well as screening costs. The use of a mismatch repair-deficient genetic background for improving mutagenesis and target-selected knockout efficiency is in principle applicable to any organism of interest.


Related Articles

  • A Point Mutation in the Aspergillus nidulans sonBNup98 Nuclear Pore Complex Gene Causes Conditional DNA Damage Sensitivity. De Souza, Cohn P. C.; Hashmi, Shahr B.; Horn, Kevin P.; Osmani, Stephen A. // Genetics;Dec2006, Vol. 174 Issue 4, p1881 

    The nuclear pore complex (NPC) is embedded in the nuclear envelope where it mediates transport between the cytoplasm and nucleus and helps to organize nuclear architecture. We previously isolated sonB1, a mutation encoding a single amino acid substitution within the Aspergillus nidulans...

  • Diverse Roles for Histone H2A Modifications in DNA Damage Response Pathways in Yeast. Moore, John D.; Yazgan, Oya; Ataian, Yeganeh; Krebs, Jocelyn E. // Genetics;May2007, Vol. 176 Issue 1, p15 

    There are main types of DNA damage that are repaired by a multiplicity of different repair pathways. All damage and repair occur in the context of chrornatin, and histone modifications are involved in many repair processes. We have analyzed the roles of H2A and its modifications in repair by...

  • Homologous repair of DNA damage and tumorigenesis: the BRCA connection. Jasin, Maria // Oncogene;12/16/2002 Review, Vol. 21 Issue 58, p8981 

    Homologous recombination has been recognized in recent years to be an important DNA repair pathway in mammalian cells, for such damage as chromosomal double-strand breaks. Cells mutated for the genes involved in the hereditary breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility syndromes, i.e. BRCA1 and...

  • Inactivation of the DNA Repair Genes mutS, mutL or the Anti-Recombination Gene mutS2 Leads to Activation of Vitamin B1 Biosynthesis Genes. Fukui, Kenji; Wakamatsu, Taisuke; Agari, Yoshihiro; Masui, Ryoji; Kuramitsu, Seiki // PLoS ONE;2011, Vol. 6 Issue 4, p1 

    Oxidative stress generates harmful reactive oxygen species (ROS) that attack biomolecules including DNA. In living cells, there are several mechanisms for detoxifying ROS and repairing oxidatively-damaged DNA. In this study, transcriptomic analyses clarified that disruption of DNA repair genes...

  • Targeting the FANCJ–BRCA1 interaction promotes a switch from recombination to polη-dependent bypass. Xie, J.; Litman, R.; Wang, S.; Peng, M.; Guillemette, S.; Rooney, T.; Cantor, S. B. // Oncogene;4/29/2010, Vol. 29 Issue 17, p2499 

    BRCA1 and the DNA helicase FANCJ (also known as BACH1 or BRIP1) have common functions in breast cancer suppression and DNA repair. However, the functional significance of the direct interaction between BRCA1 and FANCJ remains unclear. Here, we have discovered that BRCA1 binding to FANCJ...

  • SENS: A Reply to Ben Best. de Grey, Aubrey D. N. J. // Cryonics;2nd Quarter 2011, Vol. 32 Issue 2, p12 

    The article presents the author's response to Cryonics Institute chief executive officer (CEO) Ben Best's analysis of the effectiveness of Strategies for Engineered Negligible Senesescence (SENS) in combating aging. The author argues against Best's characterisation of SENS as an effort to force...

  • Mutator Phenotype of Caenorhabditis elegans DNA Damage Checkpoint Mutants. Harris, Jasper; Lowden, Mia; Clejan, Luval; Tzoneva, Monika; Thomas, James H.; Hodgkin, Jonathan; Ahmed, Shawn // Genetics;Oct2006, Vol. 174 Issue 2, p601 

    DNA damage response proteins identify sites of DNA damage and signal to downstream effectors that orchestrate either apoptosis or arrest of the cell cycle and DNA repair. The C. elegans DNA damage response mutants mrt-2, hus-1, and clk-2(mn159) displayed 8- to 15-fold increases in the frequency...

  • How DNA lesions are turned into mutations within cells? Pages, Vincent; Fuchs, Robert P.P. // Oncogene;12/16/2002 Review, Vol. 21 Issue 58, p8957 

    Genomes of all living organisms are constantly injured by endogenous and exogenous agents that modify the chemical integrity of DNA and in turn challenge its informational content. Despite the efficient action of numerous repair systems that remove lesions in DNA in an error-free manner, some...

  • After 30 Years of Study, the Bacterial SOS Response Still Surprises Us. Michel, Bénédicte // PLoS Biology;Jul2005, Vol. 3 Issue 7, p1174 

    The article presents information about the SOS response which is an inducible DNA repair system that allows bacteria to survive sudden increases in DNA damage. The importance of the SOS response is underscored by the observation that this regulatory network is widely present in bacteria,...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics