TITLE

Evolutionary origin of regulatory regions of retrogenes in Drosophila

AUTHOR(S)
Yongsheng Bai; Casola, Claudio; Betrán, Esther
PUB. DATE
January 2008
SOURCE
BMC Genomics;2008, Vol. 9, Special section p1
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Background: Retrogenes are processed copies of other genes. This duplication mechanism produces a copy of the parental gene that should not contain introns, and usually does not contain cis-regulatory regions. Here, we computationally address the evolutionary origin of promoter and other cis-regulatory regions in retrogenes using a total of 94 Drosophila retroposition events we recently identified. Previous tissue expression data has revealed that a large fraction of these retrogenes are specifically and/or highly expressed in adult testes of Drosophila. Results: In this work, we infer that retrogenes do not generally carry regulatory regions from aberrant upstream or normal transcripts of their parental genes, and that expression patterns of neighboring genes are not consistently shared by retrogenes. Additionally, transposable elements do not appear to substantially provide regulatory regions to retrogenes. Interestingly, we find that there is an excess of retrogenes in male testis neighborhoods that is not explained by insertional biases of the retroelement machinery used for retroposition. Conclusion: We conclude that retrogenes' regulatory regions mostly do not represent a random set of existing regulatory regions. On the contrary, our conclusion is that selection is likely to have played an important role in the persistence of autosomal testis biased retrogenes. Selection in favor of retrogenes inserted in male testis neighborhoods and at the sequence level to produce testis expression is postulated to have occurred.
ACCESSION #
38122822

 

Related Articles

  • The Drosophila Gene Disruption Project: Progress Using Transposons With Distinctive Site Specificities. Bellen, Hugo J.; Levis, Robert W.; Yuchun He; Carlson, Joseph W.; Evans-Holm, Martha; Eunkyung Bae; Jaeseob Kim; Metaxakis, Athanasios; Savakis, Charalambos; Schulze, Karen L.; Hoskins, Roger A.; Spradling, Allan C. // Genetics;Jul2011, Vol. 188 Issue 3, p731 

    The Drosophila Gene Disruption Project (GDP) has created a public collection of mutant strains containing single transposon insertions associated with different genes. These strains often disrupt gene function directly, allow production of new alleles, and have many other applications for...

  • Heat-Shock Promoters: Targets for Evolution by P Transposable Elements in Drosophila. Walser, Jean-Claude; Chen, Bing; Feder, Martin E. // PLoS Genetics;Oct2006, Vol. 3 Issue 4, p1541 

    Transposable elements are potent agents of genomic change during evolution, but require access to chromatin for insertion—and not all genes provide equivalent access. To test whether the regulatory features of heat-shock genes render their proximal promoters especially susceptible to the...

  • Some novel intron positions in conserved Drosophila genes are caused by intron sliding or tandem duplication. Lehmann, Jörg; Eisenhardt, Carina; Stadler, Peter F.; Krauss, Veiko // BMC Evolutionary Biology;2010, Vol. 10, p156 

    Background: Positions of spliceosomal introns are often conserved between remotely related genes. Introns that reside in non-conserved positions are either novel or remnants of frequent losses of introns in some evolutionary lineages. A recent gain of such introns is difficult to prove. However,...

  • TRF2 associates with DREF and directs promoter-selective gene expression in Drosophila. Hochheimer, Andreas; Zhou, Sharleen; Zheng, Shuang; Holmes, Michael C.; Tjian, Robert // Nature;11/28/2002, Vol. 420 Issue 6914, p439 

    Drosophila TATA-box-binding protein (TBP)-related factor 2 (TRF2) is a member of a family of TBP-related factors present in metazoan organisms. Recent evidence suggests that TRF2s are required for proper embryonic development and differentiation. However, true target promoters and the mechanisms...

  • Annotation of the Drosophila genome. Karlin, Samuel; Bergman, Aviv; Gentles, Andrew J. // Nature;5/17/2001, Vol. 411 Issue 6835, p259 

    Examines the genome sequence of the fruitfly Drosophila. Comparison of the Drosophila protein sequences created before 1999 from the SwissProt database to the Celera proteome; Use of the gene-discovery algorithms to exploit differences between exons and introns.

  • Gene mapping: I can name it in three... Casci, Tanita // Nature Reviews Genetics;Nov2003, Vol. 4 Issue 11, p849 

    Discusses a study which examined the cost efficiency of using P transposable elements to map Drosophila genome mutations. Comparison between P transposable elements and single nucleotide polymorphism mapping; Accuracy of P transposable element genome mapping; Variation in recombination rates...

  • R1 and R2 retrotransposable elements of Drosophila evolve at rates similar to those of nuclear... Eickbush, Danna G.; Lathe III, Warren C. // Genetics;Feb95, Vol. 139 Issue 2, p685 

    Compares the rates of nucleotide substitution in R1 and R2 nontransposable elements with that of several nuclear genes from the same Drosophila species. R1 and R2 elements from the melanogaster and obscura species groups; 3' untranslated regions; Protein encoding regions; Rates of nucleotide...

  • TALE-mediated modulation of transcriptional enhancers in vivo. Crocker, Justin; Stern, David L // Nature Methods;Aug2013, Vol. 10 Issue 8, p762 

    We tested whether transcription activator-like effectors (TALEs) could mediate repression and activation of endogenous enhancers in the Drosophila genome. TALE repressors (TALERs) targeting each of the five even-skipped (eve) stripe enhancers generated repression specifically of the focal...

  • Systematic Comparison of Constitutive Promoters and the Doxycycline-Inducible Promoter. Jane Yuxia Qin; Li Zhang; Clift, Kayla L.; Hulur, Imge; Xiang, Andy Peng; Bing-Zhong Ren; Lahn, Bruce T. // PLoS ONE;2010, Vol. 5 Issue 5, p1 

    Constitutive promoters are used routinely to drive ectopic gene expression. Here, we carried out a systematic comparison of eight commonly used constitutive promoters (SV40, CMV, UBC, EF1A, PGK and CAGG for mammalian systems, and COPIA and ACT5C for Drosophila systems). We also included in the...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics