Illinois School District May Lose Revenues for Desegregation

Shields, Yvette
October 2000
Bond Buyer;10/30/2000, Vol. 334 Issue 31006, p3
Trade Publication
Reports that school district officials of Rockford, Illinois, will review their options to cope with the potential loss of levies that have generated $140 million since the end of 1991 for desegration efforts. Illinois Supreme Court's ruling that the levies are illegal; District's decision to raise the levy under the state's Tort Immunity Act; Impact on the district's finances.


Related Articles

  • State vote fuels outrage. Campbell, Eric T. // Michigan Citizen;5/6/2012, Vol. 34 Issue 26, pA1 

    The article reports on the outrage that arouse at a hearing after two Republican members of the Board of State Canvassers ignored the petitions of more than 220,000 residents of Michigan residents to repeal the Public Act 4. It notes that the Act was enacted in 2011 to allow the governor to...

  • Proposed Legislation Would Ease Debt Service for Texas School Districts. Albanese, Elizabeth // Bond Buyer;03/15/2001, Vol. 335 Issue 31097, p3 

    Reports that Texas legislator Jane Nelson has proposed bills that would require the state government to issue bonds to help school districts pay off their construction debt and provide more start-up money. Advantages of school districts upon approval of such proposals; Provisions mandated under...

  • Rojas feuds with Calif. officials over funding for San Francisco. Sandham, Jessica L. // Education Week;04/07/99, Vol. 18 Issue 30, p9 

    Reports that the plans by Superintendent Waldemar Rojas to trim some $11 million from the San Francisco, California district's budget for the school year 1999-2000 have angered state lawmakers. Reason for the cuts; Criticism on the budget cuts proposed; Bill that would reimburse 14 districts...

  • State Liable for Integration Costs. Snider, William // Education Week;2/24/1988, Vol. 7 Issue 22, p5 

    The article focuses on a ruling by a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit which stated that the state of Arkansas can be ordered to fund extensive new education programs. A lower court had been found to have mistakenly indicated that Arkansas was not obligated to fund...

  • E.D. Funds 'Frozen' Pending Ruling. T. M. // Education Week;6/15/1983, Vol. 2 Issue 38, p12 

    The article reports on the order of U.S. District Judge Milton I. Shadur to Secretary of Education Terrel H. Bell to freeze 12.5-million dollar fund of the Education Department in Chicago, Illinois. The ruling will be until June 22, 1983, when the judge holds another hearing on the lawsuit of...

  • Court Says Ga. Obligated To Share Desegregation Costs. Schmidt, Peter // Education Week;9/9/1992, Vol. 12 Issue 1, p13 

    The article reports on the legal obligation of Georgia share the costs of desegregating schools, based on a federal district court ruling in Georgia. The court ruled that the Savannah and Chatham County had fought desegregation while maintaining significant power over the district and therefore...

  • A hopeful ratio. Doherty, Brian // Reason;Aug/Sep96, Vol. 28 Issue 4, p12 

    Reports on the decline in ratio of spending-increase bills to spending-cut bills from 1991 to 1995. Less willingness of members of Congress to sponsor costly bills.

  • The grim truth about Gramm-Rudman. Mitchell, Daniel J. // Policy Review;Spring90, Issue 52, p76 

    Focuses on the Gramm-Rudman Act. Viewed success; Spending control mechanism; Impact on the deficit.

  • The deficit amendment.  // Aviation Week & Space Technology;10/28/1985, Vol. 123 Issue 18, p21 

    Pending legislation to force a balanced federal budget by 1991 might inflict drastic cuts in defense spending over the next six years. Known as the Gramm/Rudman/Hollings deficit amendment, the bipartisan legislation is named after its three principal sponsors. Approval of the amendment is...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics