TITLE

LEGAL CHECKLIST

PUB. DATE
May 2007
SOURCE
People Management;5/31/2007, Vol. 13 Issue 11, p21
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article discusses several court cases related to industrial relations. A case involves a solicitor who had formed an intimate relationship with one of his staff and fired the staff in a fit of jealousy. The dismissal was regarded as unfair breach of the disciplinary and dismissal procedure. Another case involves a woman who claimed race discrimination and had entered into a compromise agreement with BT plc.
ACCESSION #
37793803

 

Related Articles

  • Employee should have been informed of vacancy. Willmott, Ben // Personnel Today;6/10/2003, p14 

    Paul v Visa International Service Association case was filed in 2003. During Paul's maternity leave, the company advertised two vacancies and an external candidate was appointed. Paul lodged a grievance, complaining that she had not been informed of the vacancies, despite having expressed prior...

  • Legal Briefs.  // HR Specialist: Illinois Employment Law;Jan2010, Vol. 4 Issue 1, p3 

    The article offers two news briefs related to labor lawsuits in Chicago, Illinois. Employers cannot retaliate against employees for complaining about discrimination, however, if an employer transfers an employee from department to department, it may be retaliation as shown in the case O'Neal v....

  • When employees foul up, feel free to tailor your response to fit the circumstances.  // HR Specialist: North Carolina Employment Law;Jul2011, Vol. 5 Issue 7, p2 

    The article discusses a court case wherein medical laboratory technician Geraldine Lauture in the U.S. has alleged that her employer has treated her harshly than others outside her protected classification who had made similar mistakes. The court has dismissed her case after examining the...

  • Case round-up. Willmott, Ben // Personnel Today;10/7/2003, p12 

    This article presents information on several lawsuits related to personnel management in Great Britain. First case is HSBC PLC v Drage, EAT, July 8, 2003. Mrs. Drage worked under a job-share arrangement at a branch of HSBC. Her contract of employment contained a mobility clause, but when the...

  • No policies, no job descriptions, no training: A case study in how not to hire & promote.  // HR Specialist: Employment Law;Jun2010, Vol. 40 Issue 6, p4 

    The court discusses a court case wherein three women sued their employer in New York for the alleged sex discrimination. The three women reasoned that they were stuck as part-time cashiers while male employees were promoted to better job positions. The court clarified the case with the company...

  • Sahota v Home Office and Pipkin. Jarvis, Susannah; Williams, Kate // Employers Law;Feb2010, p8 

    The article discusses the court case Sahota v. Home Office and Pipkin wherein the British Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) rejected a claim that action taken against a female employee in respect of her absence is considered unlawful sex discrimination.

  • Pregnant staff still face discrimination. Scott, Anna // People Management;6/28/2007, Vol. 13 Issue 13, p15 

    The article discusses a research conducted by "People Management" magazine which showed that pregnant employees still face discrimination in the workplace. 19% of personnel managers surveyed said that pregnant employees have approached them because of experiencing discrimination for being...

  • Morgan Stanley Settles Sex Bias for $54M.  // American Banker;7/13/2004, Vol. 169 Issue 133, p18 

    Announces that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and Morgan Stanley have reached a settlement in a landmark sexual discrimination case that had been scheduled to go on trial. How the EEOC accused the firm of discriminating against hundreds of women in its institutional equities...

  • Equal employment opportunity.  // Labor Law Journal;Jan78, Vol. 29 Issue 1, p61 

    This article reports on the decisions of courts and administrative agencies on equal employment opportunity cases in the U.S. in 1978. Concerning the case filed by Jordan against North Carolina Bank, the Fourth Circuit has ruled that an employer could not reasonably accommodate the needs of a...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics