TITLE

TRIPARTITE RELATIONSHIP TRANSPARENCY

AUTHOR(S)
Marriott, Camilla
PUB. DATE
April 2007
SOURCE
People Management;4/19/2007, Vol. 13 Issue 8, p22
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article discusses three court cases in Great Britain where the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) focused on the true nature of the relationship between workers and employers. In the case of Craigie v. London Borough of Haringey, the EAT ruled that the contract between Craigie and the agency and between the agency and the council, was consistent with the relationships and the services supplied. In James v. Greenwich London Borough Council, the EAT said that time alone was insufficient to form an employment relationship.
ACCESSION #
37793692

 

Related Articles

  • Moray Council v Stewart.  // Employers Law;Jul/Aug2006, p11 

    The article discusses the British Employment Appeal Tribunal case Moray Council v. Stewart. This case concerns meaning of pre-existing agreement under the Information and Consultation of Employees Regulations 2004. It presents some guidance on the requirements for a pre-existing agreement and...

  • GMB Trade Union v Brown.  // Employers Law;Dec2007, p8 

    The article discusses a British Employment Appeal Tribunal case concerning the grievance procedure. An employee had a number of hostile meetings with her line manager relating to his proposal to change her contract of employment, which had an adverse affect on her health. She requested that her...

  • Christou and another v London Borough of Haringey.  // Employers Law;Jul/Aug2012, p8 

    The article discusses the case Christou and another versus London Borough of Haringey in which the British Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) ruled that the implementation of a second disciplinary proceeding against a team manager and her subordinate social worker was fair.

  • Fahey v Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust.  // Employers Law;Jul/Aug2012, p9 

    The article discusses the case Fahey versus Plymouth Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Trust in which the British Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) ruled that the trust had made unlawful deductions from the claimant's wages.

  • Pasab Ltd trading as Jhoots Pharmacy and another v Woods.  // Employers Law;Jul/Aug2012, p9 

    The article discusses the case Pasab Ltd. trading as Jhoots Pharmacy and another versus Woods in which the British Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) ruled that victimisation only occurs when an employee's protected act is the reason for her dismissal.

  • Beaver Management Services v Acheson.  // Employers Law;Sep2012, p9 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the British Employment Appeal Tribunal upheld the appeal by the respondent on the basis that the claimant did not have authority to act as its agent, in Beaver Management Services v. Acheson.

  • Some interesting legal cases.  // British Baker;6/17/2011, Special section p4 

    The article presents two cases such as Wang v University of Keele and the Spaceright Europe v Baillavoine on the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) in Great Britain.

  • Employer fined £10,000.  // Credit Management;Jun2010, p36 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) enforced a 10,000 pounds penalty to Bournemouth University for its failure to abide with the Information and Consultation of Employees Regulations 2004.

  • Harassment can be 'unwanted' even when employee does not complain. Hughes, Ceri; Parry, David; Mather, Carly // Employers Law;Aug2010, p7 

    The article discusses the court case, Munchkins Restaurant and H. Moss v J. Karmazyn and Others, wherein the Great Britain Employment Appeal Tribunal has ruled that the appellants were jointly and severally liable for sexual harassment claims of respondents, who were their former employees for...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics