TITLE

Levels of Evidence at the AAOS Meeting: Can Authors Rate Their Own Submissions, and Do Other Raters Agree?

AUTHOR(S)
Schmidt, Andrew H.; Guofen Zhao; Turkelson, Charles
PUB. DATE
April 2009
SOURCE
Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;Apr2009, Vol. 91-A Issue 4, p867
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Background: A hierarchy of levels of evidence is commonly used to categorize the methodology of scientific studies in order to assist in their critical analysis. Organizers of large scientific meetings are faced with the problem of whether and how to assign levels of evidence to studies that are presented. The present study was performed to investigate two hypotheses: (1) that session moderators and others can consistently assign a level of evidence to papers presented at national meetings, and (2) that there is no difference between the level of evidence provided by the author of a paper and the level of evidence assigned by independent third parties (e.g., members of the Program Committee). Methods: A subset of papers accepted for presentation at the 2007 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) Annual Meeting was used to evaluate differences in the levels of evidence assigned by the authors, volunteer graders who had access to only the abstract, and session moderators who had access to the full paper. The approved AAOS levels of evidence were used. Statistical tests of interrater correlation were done to compare the various raters to each other, with significance appropriately adjusted for multiple comparisons. Results: Interrater agreement was better than chance for most comparisons between different graders; however, the level of agreement ranged from slight to moderate (kappa = 0.16 to 0.46), a finding confirmed by agreement coefficient statistics. In general, raters had difficulty in agreeing whether a study comprised Level-I or Level-II evidence and authors graded the level of evidence of their own work more favorably than did others who graded the abstract. Conclusions: When abstracts submitted to the AAOS Annual Meeting were rated, there was substantial inconsistency in the assignments of the level of evidence to a given study by different observers and there was some evidence that authors may not rate their own work the same as independent reviewers. This has important implications for the use of levels of evidence in scientific meetings.
ACCESSION #
37614976

 

Related Articles

  • Simpson, Bowles to Speak at Annual Meeting. LEAHY, MAUREEN // AAOS Now;Jan2013, Vol. 7 Issue 1, p1 

    The article provides information on the 2013 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) annual meeting in Chicago on March 21, 2013, where Alan K. Simpson and Erskine B. Bowles, cochairs of the 2010 National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform, will address the U.S.'s financial...

  • Society News.  // AAOS Now;Dec2011, Vol. 5 Issue 12, p56 

    The article offers updates on the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS). It mentions the 100,000 dollars research grant offered by the American Foundation for Surgery of the Hand (AFSH). It adds that the 8th Annual Advanced Trauma Techniques Course for Residents will be held at the...

  • New Disclosure Models Will Be Tested at Annual Meeting. DEHAVEN, KENNETH E.; PETERSON, RICHARD N. // AAOS Now;Feb2014, Vol. 8 Issue 2, p48 

    The article reports on the move of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) to test three disclosure models during the chosen educational events at the 2014 Annual Meeting. The pilot studies will be tested in paper sessions, instructional courses and symposia. The Annual Meeting...

  • AAOS to Manage Fundraising Activities.  // AAOS Now;Jan2014, Vol. 8 Issue 1, p41 

    The article reports on the fundraising activities by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) to support orthopaedic research.

  • AAOS Takes On the Windy City.  // Orthopedic Design & Technology;Jan/Feb2013, Vol. 9 Issue 1, p63 

    The article offers information on the annual meeting of American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) to be held in Chicago, Illinois on March 19-23, 2013.

  • AAOS Gearing up for 2012 Annual Meeting.  // Orthopedic Design & Technology;Nov/Dec2011, Vol. 7 Issue 7, p54 

    The article offers information on the annual meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) to be held in San Francisco, California in 20012.

  • Platelet concentrate united most long bone fractures at 12 weeks, study finds. Blisard, Renee; Vos, Robert Jan de // Orthopaedics Today Europe;2012, Vol. 15 Issue 2, p24 

    The article discusses a study presented by Rajeh Malhotra at the 2012 meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, about how the injection of platelet concentrate into non-united long bone fractures can prevent additional surgery and shorten the fractures' union time.

  • NPI at Annual Meeting: What attendees need to know.  // AAOS Now;Sep2011, Vol. 5 Issue 9, p62 

    The article offers information on the annual meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) to be held in San Francisco, California in 2012.

  • AAOS 2012 Annual Meeting.  // AAOS Now;Nov2011, Vol. 5 Issue 11, following p19 

    The article offers information on the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) Annual Meeting on February 7-11, 2012 in San Francisco, California. INSETS: Help the AAOS build a safe, accessible playground!;IMPORTANT DATES.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics