Judge certifies class action in price-fixing suit

Moore, Miles
March 2009
Rubber & Plastics News;3/23/2009, Vol. 38 Issue 17, p20
Trade Publication
The article reports that Stefan R. Underhill, judge of the U.S. District Court for Connecticut, has certified an antitrust class action alleging DSM Copolymer Inc. and DSM Elastomers Europe BV conspired with other EPDM rubber manufacturers to fix prices. First filed in 2003, the class action alleges that DSM conspired with the others to keep EPDM prices at unnaturally high levels between January 1, 1997, and December 31, 2001. Underhill certified the class action on February 13, 2009.


Related Articles

  • The passer-on problem in indirect class litigation. Coutroulis, Chris S.; Allen, D. Matthew // Antitrust Bulletin;Spring99, Vol. 44 Issue 1, p179 

    Discusses the problems of proof engendered by legislation in some states of the United States allowing indirect purchasers to sue in state courts. Federal bar against indirect purchasers suing for price fixing; Requisites for their class actions; Attempts to address the pass-on through the use...

  • Cosmetics Industry Reaches Accord in Price-Fixing Lawsuit. Young, Vicki M. // WWD: Women's Wear Daily;7/18/2003, Vol. 186 Issue 13, p1 

    Reports that beauty products retailers and manufacturers have settled a class-action lawsuit that was filed in 1998 in California state court over price-fixing allegations. Lawsuit's claims of 'collusion' centered on how prices seemed to be set up; Terms of the settlement by the manufacturers;...

  • Defendants Say MAP Isn't Price-Fixing.  // Musical Merchandise Review;Oct2010, Vol. 169 Issue 10, p10 

    The article reports that defendants in a class action lawsuit pertaining to alleged price-fixing including instrument makers Gibson, Fender and Yamaha have filed a court memorandum on August 20, 2010 saying that minimum advertised pricing is a legal business practice.

  • Consumer class actions take another beating.  // American Bar Association Journal;Jul77, Vol. 63 Issue 7, p918 

    Reports on flaws in the 1976 Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act, which was designed to allow state attorneys general to act on behalf of citizens in class action suits and sue price-fixing manufacturers. U.S. Supreme Court's 1968 decision in the case 'Hanover Shoe Inc. v. U.S....

  • Price-fixing lawsuit names 7 producers.  // Pulp & Paper;May2000, Vol. 74 Issue 5, p13 

    Reports on the class-action lawsuit filed against seven major United States-based integrated containerboard producers in 2000 on charges of price-fixing. Background of two lawsuits filed in 1998-1999 before the combined class-action lawsuit; Claims of the plaintiffs.

  • Leading Vitamin Manufacturers Settle Massive Civil Suit Over Price-Fixing.  // Chemical Market Reporter;11/08/99, Vol. 256 Issue 19, p7 

    Focuses on the settlement signed by seven major vitamin manufacturers in Europe and Japan to pay money, including plaintiffs' legal costs to settle a civil class-action lawsuit over vitamin price-fixing. Companies targeted by the lawsuit; Contribution of Roche-Poulenc SA on the settlement; How...

  • Saga continues. Watson, Paul; Langford, Ross // BRW;12/08/97, Vol. 19 Issue 47, p16 

    Reports that the class action suit against Pioneer, Boral and CSR over their participation in a Queensland, Australia concrete price-fixing cartel was struck down by the Federal Court in December of 1997. Gold Coast City Council to continue the case on their own; Other plaintiffs filing actions.

  • Thinking globally about recovery actions in international cartel cases. Scarpulla, Francis O.; Qianwei Fu // Journal of Antitrust Enforcement;Oct2015, Vol. 3 Issue 2, p363 

    This article examines the legal and practical challenges that corporate claimants face in pursuing damages actions against international price-fixing cartels. It discusses the complex jurisdiction, choice-of-law, and related procedural issues central to corporate claimants' litigation strategy...

  • Tecumseh seeks US price-fixing settlement.  // ACR News: Air Conditioning & Refrigeration News;Oct2010, Vol. 27 Issue 1, p5 

    The article reports that in response to a class action suit lodged in the U.S., Tecumseh will pay a total of 7,250,000 dollars for its alleged involvement in a price fixing conspiracy.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics