TITLE

Interesting anomalies created

PUB. DATE
March 2009
SOURCE
Finweek;3/19/2009, p64
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article offers information on the implication of the Competition Act on the intellectual property and franchise operations in South Africa. It was found that Chapter 2 of the Competition Act addresses prohibited practices, such as restrictive practices and abuse of dominant positions. Moreover, Section 5 of the Act stresses that the agreement between parties in a vertical relationship is prohibited if it prevents or lessens competition in the market.
ACCESSION #
37357191

 

Related Articles

  • Competition Policy and Property Rights. Vickers, John // Economic Journal;May2010, Vol. 120 Issue 544, p375 

    One of the most controversial questions in current competition policy is when, if ever, should competition law require a firm with market power to share its property, notably intellectual property, with its rivals? And if supply is required, on what terms? These questions are discussed with...

  • Competition Act warning.  // Credit Management;Feb2000, p7 

    Informs on Great Britain's Competition Act which comes into force on March 1, 2000. Main provisions; Survey showing majority of firms unprepared for the law.

  • Appeals court upholds franchisee's rights.  // National Petroleum News;Jan98, Vol. 90 Issue 1, p11 

    Reports on a California appellate court ruling upholding the constitutional validity of a state law that requires petroleum franchisors to grant their franchisees a bona fide opportunity to purchase the franchised premises if the franchisor decides to sell the premises to another party. Facts...

  • Anticompetitive practices and the U.K. Competition Act, 1980. Utton, Michael // Antitrust Bulletin;Summer94, Vol. 39 Issue 2, p485 

    Evaluates Great Britain's policy on anticompetitive practices, as reflected on the Competition Act of 1980. Experience with the procedures adopted under the 1980 Act; Large firms' refusal to sell; Conflict between intellectual property rights and competition policy; Cases of predatory pricing;...

  • And finally, a call to action...  // Cabinet Maker;10/23/2009, Issue 5660, p27 

    The article reports on the effort of designers and manufacturers in protecting the intellectual property rights (IPR) from being abused by perpetrators.

  • Innovation salvation. Giovanetti, Tom; Cleland, Bartlett // Hill;9/26/2008, Vol. 15 Issue 112, p17 

    The author focuses on the effort of a bipartisan group of senators, led by Patrick Leahy and Arlen Specter, to enact the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights Act (S.3325) in the U.S.

  • For the Record.  // Burnet Bulletin (Texas);10/30/2013, Vol. 140 Issue 44, p7A 

    The article announces the availability of several documents in Burnet County, Texas including the warranty deeds for Kenneth G. Martin and Karen J. Martin, the assumption of names for Markhem Towing, and the marriage of Craig A. Moehlmann with Tiana R. Clark.

  • ABOUT IP. Droege, Curtis // Inventors' Digest;Apr2014, Vol. 30 Issue 4, p24 

    The article presents an answer to question related to intellectual property.

  • Design Reuse Comes Down To Collaboration. Maliniak, David // Electronic Design;6/21/2007, Vol. 55 Issue 13, p41 

    The article offers tips in promoting intellectual property (IP) reuse.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics