Duty to Disclose Proposed Benefit Changes

Hatch, D. Diane; Hall, James E.
November 2000
Workforce (10928332);Nov2000, Vol. 79 Issue 11, p92
Deals with the lawsuit filed by Ernest Bins against his employer Exxon Co. in August 1999 concerning retirement benefits. Claims of Bins against Exxon; Ruling of the United States Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.


Related Articles

  • Remembering The Exxon Valdez. Long, Rich // Public Relations Tactics;Mar2003, Vol. 10 Issue 3, p16 

    Details on the Exxon Valdez case which concerns oil spill in Alaska. Estimates on the amount paid by Exxon for damages due to pollution; Progress with the legal charges filed against Exxon; Implications of the Exxon case for public relations consultants.

  • Anchorage, Alaska.  // Current Events;10/10/94, Vol. 94 Issue 5, p3 

    Reports that a jury ordered the Exxon Corp. to pay punitive damages for an oil spill in Prince William Sound in Alaska.

  • Exxon ruling aids insurers. Lenckus, Dave // Business Insurance;6/20/94, Vol. 28 Issue 25, p3 

    Reports on the verdict of reckless conduct issued by a federal jury against Exxon Corp. over the 1989 Prince William Sound oil spill. Order for the payment of punitive and compensatory damages; Refusal of Lloyd's of London underwriters to provide coverage to Exxon.

  • The Supreme Court refused to hear Exxon's appeal.  // Newsweek;2/10/1986, Vol. 107 Issue 6, p61 

    The Supreme Court refused to hear Exxon's appeal of a lower-court ruling that it had overcharged customers for oil delivered from a Texas oil field between 1975 and 1980. The decision meant that Exxon was liable for $2.1 billion, the largest final judgement ever entered against a single,...

  • Exxon loses appeal in 1989 Hawaii spill.  // Business Insurance;7/08/96, Vol. 30 Issue 28, p16 

    Reports on the decision of the United States Supreme Court that the owners and manufacturers of a ship mooring system is not liable for the loss of an Exxon Corp. oil tanker in Hawaii after its mooring failed during stormy weather.

  • How's That Again?  // Progressive;Jan90, Vol. 54 Issue 1, p11 

    Reports on Exxon Corp.'s lawsuit against the state of Alaska for impeding the clean-up of the Valdez oil spill.

  • `Deplorable' Exxon. Rizvi, Haider; Weissman, Robert // Multinational Monitor;Jul/Aug96, Vol. 17 Issue 7/8, p4 

    Reports on accusation by Judge H. Russell Holland that Exxon had struck a secret deal with Seattle, Washington food processors to avoid punitive damages in connection with the 1989 Valdez oil spill in Alaska. Exxon's reaction to Holland's analysis; Jury knowledge of the secret agreement;...

  • Exxon's new Valdez bill: $454 per gallon.  // U.S. News & World Report;9/26/94, Vol. 117 Issue 12, p29 

    Reports that an Alaska federal jury ruled that Exxon Corp. must pay $5 billion, or $454 per gallon for the 11 million of oil spilled from the Exxon Valdez in 1989. Fishermen and environmentalists who had sought $15 billion; Plans for Exxon to appeal the verdict; Other fines and clean-up costs...

  • $15 billion in punitives sought. Hansen, Mark // ABA Journal;Sep94, Vol. 80 Issue 9, p30 

    Discusses a lawsuit against Exxon Corp. for an oil spill it caused in Prince William Sound, Alaska. Damages caused by oil spill; Prospects of claim for damages.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics