TITLE

Duty to Disclose Proposed Benefit Changes

AUTHOR(S)
Hatch, D. Diane; Hall, James E.
PUB. DATE
November 2000
SOURCE
Workforce;Nov2000, Vol. 79 Issue 11, p92
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Deals with the lawsuit filed by Ernest Bins against his employer Exxon Co. in August 1999 concerning retirement benefits. Claims of Bins against Exxon; Ruling of the United States Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
ACCESSION #
3732605

 

Related Articles

  • Remembering The Exxon Valdez. Long, Rich // Public Relations Tactics;Mar2003, Vol. 10 Issue 3, p16 

    Details on the Exxon Valdez case which concerns oil spill in Alaska. Estimates on the amount paid by Exxon for damages due to pollution; Progress with the legal charges filed against Exxon; Implications of the Exxon case for public relations consultants.

  • Anchorage, Alaska.  // Current Events;10/10/94, Vol. 94 Issue 5, p3 

    Reports that a jury ordered the Exxon Corp. to pay punitive damages for an oil spill in Prince William Sound in Alaska.

  • Exxon ruling aids insurers. Lenckus, Dave // Business Insurance;6/20/94, Vol. 28 Issue 25, p3 

    Reports on the verdict of reckless conduct issued by a federal jury against Exxon Corp. over the 1989 Prince William Sound oil spill. Order for the payment of punitive and compensatory damages; Refusal of Lloyd's of London underwriters to provide coverage to Exxon.

  • The Supreme Court refused to hear Exxon's appeal.  // Newsweek;2/10/1986, Vol. 107 Issue 6, p61 

    The Supreme Court refused to hear Exxon's appeal of a lower-court ruling that it had overcharged customers for oil delivered from a Texas oil field between 1975 and 1980. The decision meant that Exxon was liable for $2.1 billion, the largest final judgement ever entered against a single,...

  • Exxon loses appeal in 1989 Hawaii spill.  // Business Insurance;7/08/96, Vol. 30 Issue 28, p16 

    Reports on the decision of the United States Supreme Court that the owners and manufacturers of a ship mooring system is not liable for the loss of an Exxon Corp. oil tanker in Hawaii after its mooring failed during stormy weather.

  • How's That Again?  // Progressive;Jan90, Vol. 54 Issue 1, p11 

    Reports on Exxon Corp.'s lawsuit against the state of Alaska for impeding the clean-up of the Valdez oil spill.

  • `Deplorable' Exxon. Rizvi, Haider; Weissman, Robert // Multinational Monitor;Jul/Aug96, Vol. 17 Issue 7/8, p4 

    Reports on accusation by Judge H. Russell Holland that Exxon had struck a secret deal with Seattle, Washington food processors to avoid punitive damages in connection with the 1989 Valdez oil spill in Alaska. Exxon's reaction to Holland's analysis; Jury knowledge of the secret agreement;...

  • Exxon's new Valdez bill: $454 per gallon.  // U.S. News & World Report;9/26/94, Vol. 117 Issue 12, p29 

    Reports that an Alaska federal jury ruled that Exxon Corp. must pay $5 billion, or $454 per gallon for the 11 million of oil spilled from the Exxon Valdez in 1989. Fishermen and environmentalists who had sought $15 billion; Plans for Exxon to appeal the verdict; Other fines and clean-up costs...

  • $15 billion in punitives sought. Hansen, Mark // ABA Journal;Sep94, Vol. 80 Issue 9, p30 

    Discusses a lawsuit against Exxon Corp. for an oil spill it caused in Prince William Sound, Alaska. Damages caused by oil spill; Prospects of claim for damages.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sign out of this library

Other Topics