Duty to Disclose Proposed Benefit Changes
- Remembering The Exxon Valdez. Long, Rich // Public Relations Tactics;Mar2003, Vol. 10 Issue 3, p16
Details on the Exxon Valdez case which concerns oil spill in Alaska. Estimates on the amount paid by Exxon for damages due to pollution; Progress with the legal charges filed against Exxon; Implications of the Exxon case for public relations consultants.
- Anchorage, Alaska. // Current Events;10/10/94, Vol. 94 Issue 5, p3
Reports that a jury ordered the Exxon Corp. to pay punitive damages for an oil spill in Prince William Sound in Alaska.
- Exxon ruling aids insurers. Lenckus, Dave // Business Insurance;6/20/94, Vol. 28 Issue 25, p3
Reports on the verdict of reckless conduct issued by a federal jury against Exxon Corp. over the 1989 Prince William Sound oil spill. Order for the payment of punitive and compensatory damages; Refusal of Lloyd's of London underwriters to provide coverage to Exxon.
- The Supreme Court refused to hear Exxon's appeal. // Newsweek;2/10/86, Vol. 107 Issue 6, p61
The Supreme Court refused to hear Exxon's appeal of a lower-court ruling that it had overcharged customers for oil delivered from a Texas oil field between 1975 and 1980. The decision meant that Exxon was liable for $2.1 billion, the largest final judgement ever entered against a single,...
- Exxon loses appeal in 1989 Hawaii spill. // Business Insurance;7/08/96, Vol. 30 Issue 28, p16
Reports on the decision of the United States Supreme Court that the owners and manufacturers of a ship mooring system is not liable for the loss of an Exxon Corp. oil tanker in Hawaii after its mooring failed during stormy weather.
- How's That Again? // Progressive;Jan90, Vol. 54 Issue 1, p11
Reports on Exxon Corp.'s lawsuit against the state of Alaska for impeding the clean-up of the Valdez oil spill.
- `Deplorable' Exxon. Rizvi, Haider; Weissman, Robert // Multinational Monitor;Jul/Aug96, Vol. 17 Issue 7/8, p4
Reports on accusation by Judge H. Russell Holland that Exxon had struck a secret deal with Seattle, Washington food processors to avoid punitive damages in connection with the 1989 Valdez oil spill in Alaska. Exxon's reaction to Holland's analysis; Jury knowledge of the secret agreement;...
- Exxon's new Valdez bill: $454 per gallon. // U.S. News & World Report;9/26/94, Vol. 117 Issue 12, p29
Reports that an Alaska federal jury ruled that Exxon Corp. must pay $5 billion, or $454 per gallon for the 11 million of oil spilled from the Exxon Valdez in 1989. Fishermen and environmentalists who had sought $15 billion; Plans for Exxon to appeal the verdict; Other fines and clean-up costs...
- $15 billion in punitives sought. Hansen, Mark // ABA Journal;Sep94, Vol. 80 Issue 9, p30
Discusses a lawsuit against Exxon Corp. for an oil spill it caused in Prince William Sound, Alaska. Damages caused by oil spill; Prospects of claim for damages.