Green Values

Easterbrook, Gregg
November 2000
New Republic;11/13/2000, Vol. 223 Issue 20, p18
Comments on the debate over the application of cost-benefit analysis in formulating air pollution rules in the U.S. Citation of the scheduled hearing of the U.S. Supreme Court over challenges to the Clean Air Act manifested in the lawsuit filed by the American Trucking Association Inc. against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Assertion on the impracticality of regulations designed to reduce smog-causing ozone and soot; Discomfort of legislators over placing monetary values on human life; Prevalence of the uneven application of environmental rules.


Related Articles

  • Annals of the Administrative State: Is ATA a Rising or Setting Sun? DeLong, James V. // Regulation;1999, Vol. 22 Issue 3, p3 

    Reports on the appeal filed by the United States (US) Department of Justice to the US Court of Appeals to rehear and overrule the ruling on the case American Trucking Associations versus the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Facts on the case; Issue in contest on the case; Comment from...

  • RECENT CASE. Dimino, Michael Richard // Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy;Spring2000, Vol. 23 Issue 2, p581 

    Discusses the case between the American Trucking Associations, Inc. and the Unites States Environmental Protection Agency which is about the nondelegation doctrine of some legislative power. Facts and procedural history; Commentary; Conclusion.

  • Clean Air Act challenged by court ruling.  // Energy User News;Oct99, Vol. 24 Issue 10, p26 

    Discusses the implications of the court ruling in a lawsuit brought by the American Trucking Association against the United States Environmental Protection Agency's standards for ground-level ozone and soot. Court finding of unconstitutional delegation of legislative power by the US Clean Air Act.

  • EPA Wins Big Victory on Particulate Matter and Ozone. Millar, Sheila A. // Paper, Film & Foil Converter;May2002, Vol. 76 Issue 5, p18 

    Reports on the victory of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in the American Trucking Association Inc. versus EPA case that removes the last legal obstacle to promulgation of stricter ozone and particulate matter national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). Court's basis in...

  • Keep on Truckin'. Rabkin, Jeremy // American Spectator;Jul99, Vol. 32 Issue 7, p52 

    Focuses on the May 14, 1999 ruling of the United States (US) Court of Appeals in the case involving the American Trucking Associations and the US Environmental Protection Agency. Background information on the case; Basis for the court's decision; Implication of the court's ruling.

  • Legion of Business Groups Take on the Clean Air Act. Rubenstein, David // Corporate Legal Times;Oct2000, Vol. 10 Issue 107, p96 

    Reports that additional standards developed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency for the Clean Air Act have been challenged in the case 'American Trucking Associations, et al v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, et al'. Filing of cross-petition by some parties involved in...

  • American Trucking Ass'ns, Inc. v. EPA. Brax, Jeff // Ecology Law Quarterly;2000, Vol. 27 Issue 3, p549 

    Examines the court decision in American Trucking Associations Inc. versus the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) over nondelegation doctrine for the Clean Air Act (CAA). Impact of the CAA on EPA efforts to promulgate and revise air quality standards; Decisions on the case;...

  • The Weak Nondelegation Doctrine and American Trucking Associations v. EPA. Clark, Gabriel // Brigham Young University Law Review;2000, Vol. 2000 Issue 2, p627 

    Focuses on the legal case between the American Trucking Associations Inc. versus the United States Environment Protection Agency involving the interpretation of the nondelegation doctrine of the Clean Air Act. Discussion on the background of the nondelegation doctrine; Examination on how the...

  • Court rulings question air pollution standards at EPA. Baker, Beth // BioScience;Aug99, Vol. 49 Issue 8, p618 

    Reports that on May 14, 1999, a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled that the US Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) smog and soot standards were unconstitutional and ordered EPA to rework them. Aims for the ruling in the case, the...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics