Defining Experimental Units: Agreement Awaiting Implementation: Response to Johnson (2000)

Max, Ludo; Onghena, Patrick
October 2000
Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research;Oct2000, Vol. 43 Issue 5, p1291
Academic Journal
Addresses two commonly occurring problems in experimental units discussion. Violation of sphericity assumption; Incorrect definition of experimental units; Suggestions for the promotion of more accurate use of statistical tests in speech, language and hearing research.


Related Articles

  • Biomedical Research Methodology Including Biostatistical Applications. Sharma, A. K.; Prakash, Varun // Indian Journal of Community Medicine;Jul2011, Vol. 36 Issue 3, p244 

    The article reviews the book "Biomedical Research Methodology Including Biostatistical Applications," by Ranjan Das and P. N. Das.

  • Stand up for straight statistics. Black, Mary E // BMJ: British Medical Journal (Overseas & Retired Doctors Edition;4/9/2011, Vol. 342 Issue 7801, p830 

    No abstract available.

  • Research design and statistical design. Szymanski, Edna Mora // Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin;Jun93, Vol. 36 Issue 4, p178 

    Describes research design and its relationship to statistical design. Conducting of valid research; Quantitative research design; Hypothesis testing; Control and statistical design.

  • More on Correct Definition of the Experimental Unit: An Extension of Max and Onghena (1999). Johnson, Carla J. // Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research;Oct2000, Vol. 43 Issue 5, p1290 

    Explicates the usefulness of tutorial on the definition of experimental units in both completely randomized and repeated measures designs in speech, language and hearing research. Example of correct statistical analysis in a group treatment; Common mistakes in speech, language and hearing research.

  • Respondent driven sampling--where we are and where should we be going? White, Richard G.; Lansky, Amy; Goel, Sharad; Wilson, David; Hladik, Wolfgang; Hakim, Avi; Frost, Simon D. W. // Sexually Transmitted Infections;10/ 1/2012, Vol. 88 Issue 6, p397 

    The authors ponder on the use of Respondent Driven Sampling (RDS) in medical research. They explain the concept underlying RDS, as well as its procedures and approaches. They describe the application of RDS in medical research, highlighting concerns over RDS studies. They argue that since RDS...

  • Chapter 7: Probability. Palaniswamy, Usha Rani; Palaniswamy, Kodiveri Muniyappa // Handbook of Statistics for Teaching & Research in Plant & Crop S;2006, p119 

    Provides information on the role of probabilities in the management of experimental findings. Definition of the experimentation process; Types of experiments; Definition of the classical probability.

  • Correlations. Connelly, Lynne M. // MEDSURG Nursing;May/Jun2012, Vol. 21 Issue 3, p171 

    The article offers information on correlations of variables. It refers to a study in the issue by Massey, which used Pearson's correlation coefficient, most commonly known as Pearson's r. It discusses the importance of significance level in correlation, which indicates its reliability. It also...

  • Comments on number-needed-to-treat derived from ordinal scales. Zimmermann, Helmuth; Rahlfs, Volker W // Statistical Methods in Medical Research;Feb2014, Vol. 23 Issue 1, p107 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "Correlation coefficients in medical research: from product moment correlation to the odds ratio," by H. C. Kraemer in the 2006 issue.

  • Response to Zimmermann and Rahlfs. Kraemer, Helena Chmura // Statistical Methods in Medical Research;Feb2014, Vol. 23 Issue 1, p111 

    A response from the author of the article "Correlation coefficients in medical research: from product moment correlation to the odds ratio," in the 2006 issue is presented.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics