TITLE

Court Bars Unmasking Web Critic

PUB. DATE
February 2008
SOURCE
Red Herring;2/7/2008, p6
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
This article reports that the Sixth Appellate District Court in Santa Clara County, California has reversed a trial court ruling which would have allowed a former executive at SFBC International Inc. to subpoena Yahoo! for the names of her critics. The lawsuit was filed in 2006 by former SFBC Chairman and Chief Operating Officer (COO) Lisa Krinsky against an anonymous Internet poster for making verbal attacks against the company's executives on a Yahoo! message board. The lawsuit's allegations include libel and fraud.
ACCESSION #
36876097

 

Related Articles

  • ENTRY WITHOUT DELAY.  // Labor Law Journal;Feb77, Vol. 28 Issue 2, p124 

    This article focuses on a decision given by the U.S. Supreme court that a compliance officer does not have to complete a lengthy questionnaire for an employer in order to enter a worksite. The Court said that the employer could copy information from the compliance officer's credentials and call...

  • Domestic-partners case heads to appeals court. Giordano, Scott A. // Bay Windows;12/17/1998, pN.PAG 

    Presents an update on the case challenging the Domestic Partnership Executive Order by Boston Mayor Thomas Menino as of December 17, 1998. Continuation of the effectivity of the executive order until the case reaches the Appeals Court; Overview of the ruling made by Suffolk County Superior...

  • One credit group's successful conversion to computerized... Berkowitz, Lee // Business Credit;Apr96, Vol. 98 Issue 4, p32 

    Reports that the Printing Industry Credit Executives' (PICE) transformation from a slow mail delivery system to a bulletin board system fueled the standard for a computerized credit exchange system. Why PICE's BBS is different from other bulletin board systems; Benefits of the bulletin board...

  • Ruling Should Spur Flood Coverage Sales. Sclafane, Susanne // National Underwriter / P&C;8/13/2007, Vol. 111 Issue 30, p8 

    The article reports on the decision of the New Orleans federal appeals court on the need for the homeowners to purchase the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) in New Orleans, Louisiana. It is triggered by the claims on damages caused by the Hurricane Katrina. Justin Roth, senior federal...

  • Agent Representation Held Binding; No Damage, No Coverage With Business Risk; Named Insured Can Bring Third Party Action. Harkavy, Jon // Risk Management (00355593);Apr85, Vol. 32 Issue 4, p16 

    This article discusses several court decisions affecting risk managers as of April 1985. The case Darner Motor Sales Inc. vs. Universal Underwriters Insurance Co., decided by the Arizona Supreme Court, involved a commercial insured who was mislead about the coverage it was provided by the...

  • Do attitudes toward specific supreme court decisions matter? The impact of Webster and Texas v.... Grosskopf, Anke; Mondak, Jeffrey J. // Political Research Quarterly;Sep98, Vol. 51 Issue 3, p633 

    Focuses on the manner in which attitudes regarding specific Supreme Court decisions influence subsequent levels of confidence in the court. Analysis of the impact of the 1989 `Webster' abortion decisions and `Texas v. Johnson,' the flag-burning edict released immediately prior to `Webster';...

  • Delaying Justice: The Supreme Court's Decision to Hear Rearguments. Hoekstra, Valerie; Johnson, Timothy // Political Research Quarterly;Sep2003, Vol. 56 Issue 3, p351 

    Some of the Supreme Court's most famous cases�from Roe v. Wade (1973) to Brown v. Board of Education (1954)�have been decided only after being held over and argued a second time. While few cases take this path, scholars have offered no systematic account for why the Court would ever...

  • What the Supreme Court Does for Us. Adams, James Truslow // Vital Speeches of the Day;3/15/37, Vol. 3 Issue 11, p322 

    Discusses the role played by Supreme Court and constitution in taking decision for every federal union. Freedom of court for decision on personal liberties of people; Focus of Supreme Court to decide about fundamental rights for people; Effect of changes in constitution on the court.

  • Appeals court sticks to 'under God' ruling.  // Christian Century;3/22/2003, Vol. 120 Issue 6, p14 

    Reports on the refusal by a three-judge panel of the U.S. federal appeals court to reconsider its ruling in June 2002 which struck down the Pledge of Allegiance because it contains the words 'Under God.' Determination of U.S. Department of Justice secretary John Ashcroft to appeal the case to...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sign out of this library

Other Topics