TITLE

Accuracy of Implant Placement with a Stereolithographic Surgical Guide

AUTHOR(S)
Sarment, David P.; Sukovic, Predrag; Clinthorne, Neal
PUB. DATE
July 2003
SOURCE
International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants;Jul/Aug2003, Vol. 18 Issue 4, p571
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Purpose: Placement of dental implants requires precise planning that accounts for anatomic limitations and restorative goals. Diagnosis can be made with the assistance of computerized tomographic (CT) scanning, but transfer of planning to the surgical field is limited. Recently, novel CAD/CAM techniques such as stereolithographic rapid prototyping have been developed to build surgical uides in an attempt to improve precision of implant placement. However, comparison of these advanced techniques to traditional surgical guides has not been performed. The goal of this study was to compare the accuracy of a conventional surgical guide to that of a stereolithographic surgical guide. Materials and Methods: CT scanning of epoxy edentulous mandibles was performed using a cone beam CT scanner with high isotropic spatial resolution, while planning for 5 implants on each side of the jaw was performed using a commercially available software package. Five surgeons performed osteotomies on a jaw identical to the initial model; on the right side a conventional surgical guide (control side) was used, and on the left side a stereolithographic guide was used (test side). Each jaw was then CT scanned, and a registration method was applied to match it to the nitial planning. Measurements included distances between planned implants and actual osteotomies. Results: The average distance between the planned implant and the actual osteotomy was 1.5 mm at the entrance and 2.1 mm at the apex when the control guide was used. The same measurements were significantly reduced to 0.9 mm and 1.0 mm when the test guide was used. Variations were also reduced with the test guide, within surgeons and between surgeons. Discussion: Surgical guidance for implant placement relieves the clinician from multiple perioperative decisions. Precise implant placement is under investigation using sophisticated guidance methods, including CAD/CAM templates. Conclusion: Within the limits of this study, implant placement was improved by using a stereolithographic surgical guide.
ACCESSION #
36846217

 

Related Articles

  • ADDITIVE RAPID PROTOTYPING A TECHNOLOGY OF SHAPING VIRTUAL IMAGES. Bhoyar, Anjali; Harazi, Puja // Guident;2012, Vol. 5 Issue 2, p72 

    Advances in computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) provide a new horizon for dentistry, creating an alternative technique for producing dental restorations. All CAD/CAM systems have three functional components: data capture or scanning to capture and record data about...

  • On a New Method to Assess the Accuracy of a CAD Program. Dahlmo, Karin I.; Andersson, Matts; Gellerstedt, Martin; Karlsson, Stig // International Journal of Prosthodontics;May/Jun2001, Vol. 14 Issue 3, p276 

    Purpose: This study was initiated with the purpose of developing and evaluating a system for measuring the magnitude of the variation between a computer-aided design (CAD) object created on the computer screen and a replicated object produced by computer-aided manufacturing (CAM). Materials and...

  • software mcad/cam.  // Cadalyst;Apr2003, Vol. 20 Issue 4, p14 

    No abstract available.

  • software mcad/general. Sheridan, Laracella L. // Cadalyst;Apr2003, Vol. 20 Issue 4, p16 

    No abstract available.

  • software aec.  // Cadalyst;Apr2003, Vol. 20 Issue 4, p18 

    No abstract available.

  • aec/general software.  // Cadalyst;Apr2003, Vol. 20 Issue 4, p19 

    No abstract available.

  • plotting in style. Middlebrook, Mark // Cadalyst;Apr2003, Vol. 20 Issue 4, p48 

    No abstract available.

  • CAD/CAM And Manufacturing Systems Software.  // Modern Machine Shop;Aug2002, Vol. 75 Issue 3, p388 

    Reviews several computer-aided design and manufacture and manufacturing systems software. Vericut's Mold & Die machining software from CGTech; PartMaker Version 5.3 software from PartMaker Software and IMC Inc.; PowerMill 4.5 software from Delcam International Inc.; QuickNC software Cimatron...

  • The need to keep up to speed. Johnson, Alan // Manufacturers' Monthly;Sep2015, p14 

    The article reports on the essence of software training for computer aided design (CAD) software designers.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics