TITLE

Prospective Evaluation of Implants Connected to Teeth

AUTHOR(S)
Block, Michael S.; Lirette, Denise; Gardiner, Diana; Linxiong Li; Finger, Israel M.; Hochstedler, J.; Evans, Gerald; Kent, John N.; Misiek, Dale J.; Mendez, Arturo J.; Guerra, Luis; Larsen, Harold; Wood, William; Worthington, Pat
PUB. DATE
July 2002
SOURCE
International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants;Jul/Aug2002, Vol. 17 Issue 4, p473
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Purpose: This prospective clinical trial examined the effect on teeth and implants when rigidly or non-rigidly connected in a cross-arch model. Materials and Methods: Thirty patients received 2 implants, 1 on each side of the mandible, and were restored with 3-unit fixed partial dentures connected either rigidly or non-rigidly to an abutment tooth. Patients were followed for at least 5 years post-restoration. Results: Repeated-measures analysis revealed no significant difference in crestal bone loss at implants (rigid versus non-rigid methods). An overall significant difference (P < .001) was found com- paring methods for teeth. Paired t tests revealed no significant differences in crestal bone levels for implants or teeth at the 5-year recall. Kaplan-Meier methods and the Cox proportional hazards model showed no differences between attachment methods with regard to success based on survival and bone loss criteria. During the 5-year recall period, 1 implant (rigid side) was removed. Four implants developed bone loss greater than 2 mm during the course of this trial. One tooth on the rigid side and 2 teeth on the non-rigid side had greater than 2 mm of crestal bone loss and were removed secondary to fractures. In all, 5 abutment teeth were removed, all of which had been treated with root canal therapy and fractured at the interface of the post within the tooth. There was no clear relationship of tooth fracture to attachment. Repeated-measures analysis of mobility values revealed no significant changes over the time course of this study, and paired t tests revealed no statistically significant differences between implants for mobility. Repeated-measures analysis and paired t tests for probing depth revealed no significant changes over the time course of this study. There were no significant differences in soft tissue indices for either attachment method. The percentage of patients who had measurable intrusion was 66% for the non-rigid group, and 44% for the rigid group; 25% of the non-rigid teeth had greater than 0.5 mm intrusion, compared with 12.5% for the rigid group. For the 2 time periods evaluated, there was no significant increase in intrusion over time. The non-rigid-side implant required more nonscheduled visits to treat problems than the rigid implant and the teeth. Discussion: Most patients were treated successfully with rigid or non-rigid attachment of implants to teeth. Conclusion: The high incidence of intrusion and non-scheduled patient visits suggest that alternative treatments without connecting implants to teeth may be indicated.
ACCESSION #
36846129

 

Related Articles

  • Resin-bonded fixed partial dentures past and present - an overview. Lally, Una // Journal of the Irish Dental Association;Dec2012/Jan2013, Vol. 58 Issue 6, p294 

    Resin-bonded fixed partial dentures have been in use for over 30 years, since the concept was first introduced in the 1970s. Initial efforts in this field suffered frequent early debond, but advances in metal alloys, treatment of the fitting surface and bonding techniques have made the...

  • Non-Rigid Connector for Managing Pier Abutment in FPD: A Case Report. SURYAKANTH AKULWAR, RAVIKUMAR; KODGI, ASHWIN // Journal of Clinical & Diagnostic Research;Jul2014, Vol. 8 Issue 7, p12 

    A frequent clinical situation, either in the maxillary or mandibular arch, is of a missing first premolar and first molar, resulting in fixed partial denture design in which the canine and the second molar act as terminal abutments and second premolar act as a pier abutment. It has been...

  • How long do fibre-reinforced resin-bonded fixed partial dentures last? Pye, Andrew // Evidence-Based Dentistry;Sep2009, Vol. 10 Issue 3, p75 

    Data SourcesSearches were made for data using Medline and the reference lists of identified papers by two independent readers. Only papers published in English were considered and reviews, case reports, descriptive reports and in-vitro studies were excluded.Study selectionProspective or...

  • A Prospective Multicenter Clinical Trial of 3i Machined-Surface Implants: Results After 6 Years of Follow-up. Weng, Dietmar; Jacobson, Zhimon; Tarnow, Dennis; Hürzeler, Markus B.; Faehn, Ove; Sanavi, Farshid; Barkvoll, Pål; Stach, Renée M. // International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants;May/Jun2003, Vol. 18 Issue 3, p417 

    Purpose: In this prospective multicenter clinical study, 1,179 3i standard threaded and self-tapping implants were followed for up to 6 years and monitored according to established success criteria. Materials and Methods: A total of 493 patients (240 men and 253 women) with a mean age of 45.1...

  • Two-Unit Cantilevered Resin-Bonded Fixed Partial Dentures--A Retrospective, Preliminary Clinical Investigation. Botelho, Michael G.; Lai Ching Nor; Ha Wai Kwong; Bih Sau Kuen // International Journal of Prosthodontics;Jan/Feb2000, Vol. 13 Issue 1, p25 

    Purpose: The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the clinical retention and abutment movement of 2-unit cantilevered resin-bonded fixed partial dentures (FPD) that were inserted at Prince Philip Dental Hospital in Hong Kong. Materials and Methods: Of 45 patients who were identified...

  • Improved design of long-span resin-bonded fixed partial dentures: Three case reports. Botelho, Michael G. // Quintessence International;Mar2003, Vol. 34 Issue 3, p167 

    When single-tooth implants are not appropriate, the use of resin-bonded fixed partial dentures is a preferred treatment option when the abutments are relatively sound. However, the use of resin-bonded fixed partial dentures (RBFPDs) for replacing two or more missing teeth is considered to have a...

  • Survival rates for resin bonded bridges. Abt, Elliot // Evidence-Based Dentistry;Mar2008, Vol. 9 Issue 1, p20 

    Data SourcesMedline and hand searching of bibliographies of identified articles.Study SelectionStudies were selected independently by two reviewers. Prospective and retrospective cohort studies with a mean follow-up period of five or more years with clinical examination at follow-up that...

  • Influence of Framework Design on Fracture Strength of Mandibular Anterior All-Ceramic Resin- Bonded Fixed Partial Dentures. Koutayas, Spiridon Oumvertos; Kern, Matthias; Ferraresso, Franco; Strub, Jörg Rudolf // International Journal of Prosthodontics;May/Jun2002, Vol. 15 Issue 3, p223 

    Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of the framework design on the fracture strength of all-ceramic resin-bonded fixed partial dentures (RBFPD) in the mandibular incisor region. Materials and Methods: Twenty-four aluminum oxide ceramic frameworks were copy...

  • A Literature Review of Two-Unit Cantilevered FPDs. van Dalen, Andy; Feilzer, Albert J.; Kleverlaan, Cornelis J. // International Journal of Prosthodontics;May/Jun2004, Vol. 17 Issue 3, p281 

    Purpose: This review article evaluated the clinical performance of two-unit cantilevered, single-abutment, single-pontic, resin-bonded fixed partial dentures (FPDs) by comparing them to noncantilevered resin-bonded FPDs with two abutments and a single pontic. Materials and Methods: One...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics