Onset and duration periods of articaine and lidocaine on maxillary infiltration

Costa, Carina Gisele; Tortamano, Isabel Peixoto; Rocha, Rodney Garcia; Francischone, Carlos Eduardo; Tortamano, Nicolau
March 2005
Quintessence International;Mar2005, Vol. 36 Issue 3, p197
Academic Journal
Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the onset and duration of pulpal anesthesia by maxillary infiltration using 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine, 4% articaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine, and 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. Method and Materials: Twenty healthy patients randomly received 1.8 mL of one of the three local anesthetics during operative dentistry procedures of low complexity on three maxillary posterior teeth. Onset and duration were determined using an electric pulp tester. Results: The mean values for pulpal onset were 2.8, 1.6, and 1.4 minutes and for pulpal duration were 39.2, 56.7, and 66.3 minutes, respectively, for 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine, 4% articaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine, and 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. Statistical analysis by the Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric test showed significant differences with better results (shorter onset and longer duration periods) for both articaine solutions compared with the lidocaine solution. Although 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine clinically presented the shortest onset and the longest duration periods, there was no statistically significant difference between the articaine solutions. Conclusion: Both articaine solutions produced shorter onset and longer duration of pulpal anesthesia by maxillary infiltration than the lidocaine solution did. Statistical analysis did not confirm better clinical results of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine than with 4% articaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine.


Related Articles

  • 2% Xylocaine DENTAL with adrenaline in 2.2 mL.  // Australasian Dental Practice;Jul/Aug2012, Vol. 23 Issue 4, p34 

    The article discusses the release of 2% Xylocaine DENTAL with adrenaline 1:80,000 from Dentsply Australia.

  • Clinical Evaluation of a New Anesthetic Agent, L67. COWAN, ADRIAN // Journal of Dental Research;Jan1962, Vol. 41 Issue 1, p427 

    The article discusses anesthetics in dentistry and presents a clinical evaluation of the anesthetic agent L67. Details are provided about agent L67, an anesthetic similar to lignocaine, but with less adrenalin. The researchers injected patients undergoing normal dental procedures with varying...

  • Anterior and middle superior alveolar nerve block for anesthesia of maxillary teeth using conventional syringe. Velasco, Ignacio; Soto, Reinaldo // Dental Research Journal;Sep2012, Vol. 9 Issue 5, p535 

    Background: Dental procedures in the maxilla typically require multiple injections and may inadvertently anesthetize facial structures and affect the smile line. To minimize these inconveniences and reduce the number of total injections, a relatively new injection technique has been proposed for...

  • Safety and Efficacy of a Novel Nasal Spray for Maxillary Dental Anesthesia. Ciancio, S.G.; Hutcheson, M.C.; Ayoub, F.; Pantera, E.A.; Pantera, C.T.; Garlapo, D.A.; Sobieraj, B.D.; Almubarak, S.A. // Journal of Dental Research;Jul2013 Supplement, Vol. 92 Issue 7, pS43 

    This study examines the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a nasal spray to induce anesthesia of maxillary teeth. Forty-five healthy adults requiring restoration of one maxillary tooth were randomized in a 1:2 ratio to receive (1) an intra-oral lidocaine-epinephrine injection with buffered...

  • Estudio comparativo de la efectividad de dos anestésicos locales. Bohórquez, Enrique Vásquez; Tenorio, Rubén Ramos; Domínguez, Ernesto Ignacio Villalobos // Medicina Oral (16656024);2003, Vol. 5 Issue 3, p79 

    A clinical, analytical, prospective and transverse study was carried out between November 1st, 2002 and March 31, 2003, with the aim of comparing clinical effectiveness of two different types of local anesthetic drugs: lydocaine 2% and articaine 4%, both plus epinephrine 1:100,000. One hundred...

  • Changes in Plasma Epinephrine Concentration after Dental Infiltration Anesthesia with Different Doses of Epinephrine. KNOLL-KÖHLER, E.; FRIE, A.; BECKER, J.; OHLENDORF, D. // Journal of Dental Research;Jun1989, Vol. 68 Issue 6, p1098 

    To define the cardiovascular risk as a result of epinephrine in local anesthetic solutions used in dental anesthesia, we measured the plasma epinephrine levels, the mean arterial brachial pressure (MAP), and heart rate for 15 min, after infiltration anesthesia in the area buccal to the upper...

  • The anesthetic efficacy of articaine in buccal infiltration of mandibular posterior teeth. Robertson, Douglas; Nusstein, John; Reader, Al; Beck, Mike; McCartney, Melissa // Journal of the American Dental Association (JADA);Aug2007, Vol. 138 Issue 8, p1104 

    The article compares the degree of pulpal anesthesia achieved by means of mandibular first molar buccal infiltrations of two anesthetic solutions. The authors compared the solutions made of articaine and epinephrine with a solution comprised of lidocaine and epinephrine. According to the...

  • Study of the Anesthetic Efficacy of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block using Articaine in Irreversible Pulpitis. Ahmad, Zeeshan H.; Ravikumar, H.; Karale, Rupali; Preethanath, R. S.; Sukumaran, Anil // Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice;Jan/Feb2014, Vol. 15 Issue 1, p71 

    Aim: The purpose of this study was to determine the anesthetic efficacy of inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) using 4% articaine and 2% lidocaine supplemented with buccal infiltration. Materials and methods: Forty five patients, diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis of a mandibular posterior...

  • Articaine is superior to lidocaine in providing pulpal anesthesia. Powell, Virginia // Journal of the American Dental Association (JADA);Aug2012, Vol. 143 Issue 8, p897 

    The article presents critical summary of a study comparing the effectiveness of 4 percent articaine with 2 percent lidocaine to induce successful pulpal anesthesia in adult patients. The results of which revealed that 4 percent articaine was more effective that 2 percent lidocaine when...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics