TITLE

FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp

PUB. DATE
April 2000
SOURCE
Current Legal Documents;1950-, p0
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Presents the United States Supreme Court case of the US Food & Drug Administration (FDA) vs. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp which was decided on March 21, 2000. History of the case; Rules passed by the FDA regarding the sale of cigarettes and smokeless tobacco to teenagers; Tobacco-specific legislation passed by Congress during the 1900s; The addictive nature of tobacco products; Decision of the court.
ACCESSION #
3653431

 

Related Articles

  • FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION et al. v. BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORP. et al.: certiorari to the United States court of appeals for the fourth circuit.  // Supreme Court Cases: The Twenty-first Century (2000 - Present);2009, p1 

    The article presents information on U.S. Supreme Court case Food and Drug Administration (FDA)et al. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., case number 98-1152, argued on December 1, 1999 and decided on March 21, 2000. The Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) grants the Food and Drug Administration...

  • FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION et al. v. BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORP. et al.: certiorari to the United States court of appeals for the fourth circuit.  // Supreme Court Cases: The Twenty-first Century (2000 - Present);2009, p1 

    The article presents information on U.S. Supreme Court case Food and Drug Administration (FDA)et al. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., case number 98-1152, argued on December 1, 1999 and decided on March 21, 2000. The Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) grants the Food and Drug Administration...

  • Before the Court.  // Supreme Court Debates;Feb2000, Vol. 3 Issue 2, p62 

    Presents excerpts from the arguments for the U.S. Supreme Court case 'Food and Drug Administration (FDA) etal. v. Brown & Williamson et al.' Influence of the U.S. Surgeon General's issuance of report on the addictiveness of nicotine on the implementation of the regulation by the U.S. Food and...

  • Tobacco firm blows off claim.  // American Libraries;Jun95, Vol. 26 Issue 6, p504 

    Reports on the Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co.'s withdrawal of its confidentiality claim to more than a third of its photocopied company documents donated to the University of California/San Francisco library archive. Moving of documents into police-evidence vault; Availability of papers to...

  • Tobacco verdict may cost insurers. Lonkevich, Dan // National Underwriter / Property & Casualty Risk & Benefits Manag;8/19/96, Vol. 100 Issue 34, p3 

    Reports on the implications of a court decision against Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. Landmark verdict handed down by Florida state court in case called Grady Carter v. American Tobacco; Documents indicating that tobacco industry knew nicotine was addictive and hid information from smokers;...

  • Taking on Tobacco. Freeman, Suzanne; Rubin, Jeffrey // Scholastic News -- Senior Edition;09/06/99, Vol. 68 Issue 1, p4 

    Reports on taking the anti-tobacco case of the United States Food and Drug Administration versus Brown and Williamson Tobacco Corp. to the Supreme Court. INSET: A Tobacco Timeline.

  • Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. Steiner, Heather // Ecology Law Quarterly;2001, Vol. 28 Issue 2, p355 

    The United States Supreme Court invalidated the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) attempt to regulate tobacco under the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA). The significance of this decision for environmental purposes is in the Court's altered application of the long-standing two-step Chevron...

  • Smoker wins damages against US tobacco company. Charatan, Fred B. // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);8/17/96, Vol. 313 Issue 7054, p382 

    Reports that lung cancer victim Grady Carter won the verdict against Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. Award of $750,000 by a Florida jury; Comments from the lawyers of Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.; Significance of the case to the tobacco industry.

  • CIGARETTE WARS.  // ABA Journal;Nov87, Vol. 73 Issue 11, p113 

    Focuses on a decision by an appellate court in the United States, which ruled that a television anchorman acted with malice when he accused a tobacco company of commissioning advertisements that linked smoking with sex and drinking. Affirmation of punitive-damages award to Brown & Williamson...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of NEW JERSEY STATE LIBRARY

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics