Wireless enters compensation fray

Weaver, Heather Forsgren
September 2000
RCR Wireless News;9/18/2000, Vol. 19 Issue 38, p8
Trade Publication
Focuses on the fight of the wireless industry for reciprocal-compensation in the United States. Efforts of the House telecommunication subcommittee to mark up a bill on changing compensation scheme for carrying traffic; Details of the billing legislation; Plans of the House to phase-out three percent excise tax.


Related Articles

  • Carriers collecting excise taxes despite Circuit Court ruling. Martinez, Marialba // Caribbean Business;7/3/2003, Vol. 31 Issue 26, p53 

    Reports that most cargo transportation companies are continuing to collect excise taxes for the Puerto Rico Treasury Department. Reason behind the companies' move; Carriers operating in the country.

  • A victory for the forces of censorship. Porter, Stephen M. // Computer Graphics World;Mar96, Vol. 19 Issue 3, p4 

    Criticizes the Communications Decency Act, an amendment in the Telecommunications Act of 1996. Threat to freedom of speech; Ban of the use or transmission of indecent comments, requests, suggestions or image from the online world; Censorship of public and private communications in cyberspace.

  • Censorship in cyberspace: Communications Decency Act. Budd, Jordan // San Diego Business Journal;5/27/96, Vol. 17 Issue 22, p9B 

    Focuses on the `Communications Decency Act' provision under the Telecommunications Reform Act of 1996. Elimination of all materials from the Internet and other on-line computer networks that are `indecent'; Criminal penalties; Author's criticism against the provision's failure to regulate...

  • Setting an example for the world. Flanigan, Matthew J. // America's Network;06/01/97, Vol. 101 Issue 11, p10 

    Reports on the promise of competition in all sectors of the communications industry is hovering around the world. Concern of the Telephone Industry Association (TIA) regarding the Federal Communication Commission's (FCC) Interconnection Order; Telecommunications Act of 1996; Real benefits from...

  • CDA blocked by federal panel. Cooper, Charles; Callaway, Erin // PC Week;6/17/96, Vol. 13 Issue 24, p134 

    Reports on the decision of federal judges in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania to block the enforcement of the Communications Decency Act. Background information; Implications for computer industry; Expectations. INSET: Next stop?..

  • Know-nothing legislation about the Net. Rawlinson, Nora // Publishers Weekly;3/11/1996, Vol. 243 Issue 11, p9 

    Editorial. Comments on the Communications Decency Act of 1995. Names of organizations which filed lawsuits against the act; Internet information resources related to the act.

  • A free speech victory. Littwin, Angela // Telecommunications - Americas Edition;Sep96, Vol. 30 Issue 9, p22 

    Reports that a U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania three-judge panel has unanimously declared the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 as unconstitutional.

  • CDA declared unconstitutional. Hernandez, Debra Gersh // Editor & Publisher;6/22/96, Vol. 129 Issue 25, p50 

    Reports on a Philadelphia, Pennsylvania panel of judges' ruling that the Communications Decency Act (CDA) section of the 1996 Telecommunications Act was unconstitutional. Preliminary injunction against the act's enforcement; Threat to the First Amendment; Two lawsuits filed separately by the...

  • What's left of the Communications Decency Act? Townsend, Anthony M.; Whitman, Michael E.; Alberts, Robert J. // HR Magazine;Jun98, Vol. 43 Issue 7, p124 

    Discusses provisions of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 (CDA) that impact on telecommunication policies for employers in the United States. Potential for liability; Prevention of CDA-prohibited activities; Procedures for telecommunication policy.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics