The Epidemiology of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty in the United States

Bozic, Kevin J.; Kurtz, Steven M.; Lau, Edmund; Kevin Ong; Vail, Thomas P.; Berry, Daniel J.
January 2009
Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;Jan2009, Vol. 91-A Issue 1, p128
Academic Journal
Background: Understanding the causes of failure and the types of revision total hip arthroplasty performed is essential for guiding research, implant design, clinical decision-making, and health-care policy. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the mechanisms of failure and the types of revision total hip arthroplasty procedures performed in the United States with use of newly implemented ICD-9-CM (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification) diagnosis and procedure codes related specifically to revision total hip arthroplasty in a large, nationally representative population. Methods: The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was used to analyze clinical, demographic, and economic data from 51,345 revision total hip arthroplasty procedures performed between October 1, 2005, and December 31, 2006. The prevalence of revision procedures was calculated for population sub-groups in the United States that were stratified according to age, sex, diagnosis, census region, primary payer class, and type of hospital. The cause of failure, the average length of stay, and total charges were also determined for each type of revision arthroplasty procedure. Results: The most common type of revision total hip arthroplasty procedure performed was all-component revision (41.1%), and the most common causes of revision were instability/dislocation (22.5%), mechanical loosening (19.7%), and infection (14.8%). Revision total hip arthroplasty procedures were most commonly performed in large, urban, nonteaching hospitals for Medicare patients seventy-five to eighty-four years of age. The average length of hospital stay for all types of revision arthroplasties was 6.2 days, and the average total charges were $54,553. However, the average length of stay, average charges, and procedure frequencies varied considerably according to census region, hospital type, and type of revision total hip arthroplasty procedure performed. Conclusions: Hip instability and mechanical loosening are the most common indications for revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States. As further experience is gained with the new diagnosis and procedure codes specifically related to revision total hip arthroplasty, this information will be valuable in directing future research, implant design, and clinical decision- making. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Related Articles

  • Strategies for head and inlay exchange in revision hip arthroplasty. Pospischill, Martin; Knahr, Karl // International Orthopaedics;Feb2011, Vol. 35 Issue 2, p261 

    Due to the increasing number of total hip arthroplasties performed during the last three decades and the limited long-term survival, mainly because of wear, the number of revisions has increased during the last two years. If the implant itself is still considered to be stable, only head and...

  • Jumbo cups for revision of acetabular defects after total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective review of a case series. Wedemeyer, Christian; Neuerburg, Carl; Heep, Hansjoerg; Von Knoch, Fabian; Von Knoch, Marius; Löer, Franz; Saxler, Guido // Archives of Orthopaedic & Trauma Surgery;Jun2008, Vol. 128 Issue 6, p545 

    The treatment of acetabular bone defects presents a great challenge in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcome of revision THA using jumbo cups for acetabular reconstruction after applying the bone-grafting technique....

  • Look to constrained liners to treat patients with chronic hip dislocation after THA. Brockenbrough, Gina // Orthopedics Today;Oct2008, Vol. 28 Issue 10, p9 

    The article looks at using constrained total hip designs to treat dislocation in total hip arthroplasty. Mathias P.G. Bostrom, MD, noted the success rates using the Osteonics device but suggested options such as using Durasul, a Zimmer design which has an improved range of motion. Bostrom...

  • Revision total hip arthroplasty using the Zweymuller femoral stem. Matthew Oetgen; Michael Huo // Journal of Orthopaedics & Traumatology;Jun2008, Vol. 9 Issue 2, p57 

    Abstract Background  A variety of femoral stem designs have been reported to be successful in revision total hip arthroplasty without consensus as to optimal design. We evaluated the clinical and radiographic outcomes in a consecutive series of femoral revisions using a wedge-shape,...

  • Revision of failed hip resurfacing to total hip arthroplasty rapidly relieves pain and improves function in the early post operative period. Sandiford, Nemandra A.; Muirhead-Allwood, Sarah K.; Skinner, John A. // Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Research;2010, Vol. 5, p88 

    We reviewed the results of 25 consecutive patients who underwent revision of a hip resurfacing prosthesis to a total hip replacement. Revisions were performed for recurrent pain and effusion, infection and proximal femoral fractures. Both components were revised in 20 cases. There were 12 male...

  • Modes of Failure of Osteonics Constrained Tripolar Implants: A Retrospective Analysis of Forty-three Failed Implants. Olivier Guyen; David G. Lewallen; Miguel E. Cabanela // Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;Jul2008, Vol. 90-A Issue 7, p1553 

    Background: The Osteonics constrained tripolar implant has been one of the most commonly used options to manage recurrent instability after total hip arthroplasty. Mechanical failures were expected and have been reported. The purpose of this retrospective review was to identify the observed...

  • THE USE OF STRUCTURAL DISTAL FEMORAL ALLOGRAFTS FOR ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION. Sporer, Scott M.; O'Rourke, Michael; Chong, Paul; Paprosky, Wayne G. // Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;Apr2005, Vol. 87-A Issue 4, p760 

    Background: Acetabular fixation during revision total hip arthroplasty in patients who have a nonsupportive superior dome and proximal migration of tile acetabular component (a Paprosky Type-IIIa defect) cannot be achieved reliably with use of a hemispherical porous-coated component alone. The...

  • REVISION OF THE ACETABULAR COMPONENT WITHOUT CEMENT AFTER TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY. Della Valle, Craig J.; Shuaipaj, Tasin; Berger, Richard A.; Rosenberg, Aaron G.; Shott, Susan; Jacobs, Joshua J.; Galante, Jorge O. // Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;Aug2005, Vol. 87-A Issue 8, p1795 

    Abstract: We previously reported our results at a minimum of three and seven years after use of a porous-coated acetabular metal shell in a consecutive series of 138 revision total hip arthroplasties. The current report presents the longer-term outcomes of these procedures, at fifteen to...

  • Revision of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing cup: technical notes and the use of a novel technique to overcome unique problems. SANDIFORD, N. A.; KABIR, C.; MUIRHEAD-ALLWOOD, S. K.; SKINNER, J.; NUTHALL, T. // Hip International;Jul-Sep2008, Vol. 18 Issue 3, p220 

    The number of hip resurfacing procedures performed in the United Kingdom has doubled in the last four years reflecting its popularity among orthopaedic surgeons. Of the available options the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) prosthesis has been the most popular choice in this country. Despite...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics