TITLE

Company Entitled to Terminate Pensioner Death Benefit

PUB. DATE
November 2008
SOURCE
Legal-Legislative Reporter;Nov2008, Vol. 42 Issue 11, p14
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article discusses a court case in which the plaintiff sued the defendant for alleged unlawful termination of the pensioner death benefit. The plaintiff sought declaratory and injunctive relief reversing the termination. The district court ruled that the complaint should be dismissed due to failure of stating a claim upon which relief may be granted. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit ruled that the pensioner death benefit was an unvested welfare benefit.
ACCESSION #
36236713

 

Related Articles

  • Court Affirms Estate as Proper Beneficiary of Life Insurance Proceeds.  // Legal-Legislative Reporter;Sep2009, Vol. 43 Issue 9, p3 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the United State Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit upheld the decision of a district court stating that the estate remains the beneficiary of life insurance proceeds of a decedent. In Prudential Insurance Company of America v. Pryor et al., the...

  • Plan Language Insufficient to Confer Discretionary Authority on Plan Administrator.  // Benefits Magazine;Oct2011, Vol. 48 Issue 10, p57 

    The article discusses a case wherein the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit deemed inappropriate the deferential review of the decision of the defendant plan administrator on the basis of the language in the underlying benefits plan. In Viera versus Life Insurace Co. of North America.,...

  • Structural and Procedural Irregularities Require Heightened Standard of Review.  // Legal-Legislative Reporter;Dec2007, Vol. 41 Issue 12, p4 

    The article discusses a court case wherein a plaintiff filed an appeal to re-instate her disability benefits after the defendant insurance company terminated it on the basis that she is no longer qualified under the terms of the plan. Upon appeal, the district court applied a sliding scale...

  • Court Affirms Award of Attorney Fees and Costs.  // Legal-Legislative Reporter;Dec2007, Vol. 41 Issue 12, p10 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the defendant employer filed an action challenging the timeliness and reasonableness of a district court's award of $28,623.14 in attorney fees and costs for the plaintiff. Citing the merits for disposing the plaintiff's claims, the U.S. Court of...

  • Court Affirms Pension Benefit Adjustment.  // Legal-Legislative Reporter;Oct2009, Vol. 43 Issue 10, p5 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed a decision of a defendant pension plan that called for an adjustment of a plaintiff's pension benefits according to the interpretation of the plan. The plaintiff was informed of errors made in the...

  • Administrator Reasonably Determined That Death by Medical Error Was Not Accidental.  // Benefits & Compensation Digest;Dec2010, Vol. 47 Issue 12, p46 

    The article discusses a court case where the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit found that the defendant plan administrator's denial of benefits was reasonable. The plaintiff sought benefits under an accidental death and dismemberment plan as his sister's beneficiary who died due to a...

  • Termination of Benefits Was Arbitrary and Capricious.  // Benefits Magazine;May2011, Vol. 48 Issue 5, p47 

    The article discusses a court case which involves the termination of a commercial airline pilot's disability benefits. The pilot, who suffers from a anxiety disorder and brief reactive psychosis, filed for a long-term disability benefits under his company's defined benefit pension plan. The...

  • 'About Face' for Military Recruiters on Campus.  // University Business;Jan2005, Vol. 8 Issue 1, p19 

    Reports on the ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on a case regarding the Solomon Amendment, a legislation where colleges and universities can ban military recruiters on campus. Return to prior policy of barring recruiters on campus by Harvard Law School; Other schools...

  • Plaintiff Fails to Satisfy Definition of Disability.  // Legal-Legislative Reporter;Aug2009, Vol. 43 Issue 8, p6 

    The article discusses a court case wherein plaintiff appealed the decision of a plan administrator which denied his claim for long term disability benefits. The plaintiff's claim was denied after physicians found no sufficient evidence to show that he was disabled in November 1995, the time he...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics