TITLE

IS TUPE A SAFETY NET OR A TRICKY ACT TO FOLLOW?

AUTHOR(S)
Cole, Kelly
PUB. DATE
January 2008
SOURCE
People Management;1/10/2008, Vol. 14 Issue 1, p20
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article examines the Transfer of Undertakings (Tupe) decision on the case Power versus Regent Security Services Ltd., and its implications for employers in Great Britain. which involved an employee transferred under Tupe who had agreed to change his contractual retirement age from 60 to 65. In this case, the Employment Appeals Tribunal (EAT) departed from previous case law by deciding that employees could rely on favourable changes to employment terms and conditions following a Tupe transfer.
ACCESSION #
36159944

 

Related Articles

  • IN FOCUS.  // Employers Law;Nov2008, p9 

    This section presents a summary of court cases related to labor and employment in Great Britain. In Autoclenz Ltd. versus Belcher, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) held that car valets were not employees. In Dragonfly Consultancy Limited versus The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue &...

  • Ward Hadaway Solicitors v Love and others. Samuel, Helen; Bridges, Anna // Employers Law;Jun2010, p8 

    The article reports that the British Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has upheld a tribunal's decision stating that there was no service provision change under the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 when a client transferred its work to another law firm.

  • Unfair Dismissal and Human Rights. Lucy Vickers // Industrial Law Journal;Mar2004, Vol. 33 Issue 1, p52 

    The article discusses a court case Pay versus Lancashire Probation Service, wherein the plaintiff who was a probation officer was dismissed for his participation in a sado-masochistic activity in Great Britain. The Employment Appeals Tribunal's (EAT) decision was of the view that the plaintiff's...

  • Beijing Ton Ren Tan v Wang.  // Employers Law;Dec2009/Jan2010, p8 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the British Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) ruled that an employee is entitled to holiday pay and should be paid at the end of employment in the event that the employee does not take such holidays. In Beijing Ton Ten Tan v. Wang, Beijing Ton Ren Tang...

  • EBR Attridge Law LLP (formerly Attridge Law) and anor v Coleman.  // Employers Law;Dec2009/Jan2010, p9 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the British Employment Appeal Tribunal ruled that a claim may be filed by employees being discriminated or harassed due to their association with a disabled person. In EBR Attridge Law LLP (formerly Attridge Law) and Anor v. Coleman, EBR Attridge Law...

  • Hellewell v AXA Services Ltd and another (Rev 1). Benson, Claire; Jacobs, Caroline; McAvoy, Chris // Employers Law;Sep2011, p8 

    The article discusses a court case where the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) held that there was no unlawful deduction of wages claims since the claimants have no legal entitlement to the payment. The claimants alleged that their employer made an unlawful deduction from their wages contrary to...

  • Kirklees Metropolitan Council v Radecki.  // Employers Law;Jun2009, p8 

    The article discusses the appellate case Kirklees Metropolitan Council versus Radecki in England in which the appellant brought unfailr dismissal claim. Radecki and the council failed to reach a binding agreement and he was terminated on October 31, 2006. The tribunal rejected the unfair...

  • The coming of age claims to tribunals.  // Personnel Today;11/20/2007, p4 

    The article offers information about judgments given by the Employment Appeal Tribunal of Great Britain on several cases concerning employment discrimination. The Tribunal gave a judgment in favor of a 20-year-old woman, Megan Thomas, who was dismissed for being too young. The Tribunal reversed...

  • Sex discrimination and pregnancy.  // Accountancy;Aug1985, Vol. 96 Issue 1104, p34 

    This article examines a decision of the British Employment Appeal Tribunal in Turley v. Allders Department Stores Ltd. which held that dismissal for pregnancy was not capable of constituting sex discrimination. The Tribunal affirms that it could not be direct discrimination under the Sex...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics