TITLE

Citation Auctions as a Method to Improve Selection of Scientific Papers

AUTHOR(S)
de la Rosa, Josep Lluis; Szymanski, Boleslaw K.
PUB. DATE
October 2008
SOURCE
Journal of Digital Information Management;Oct2008, Vol. 6 Issue 5, p414
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
This paper describes the basis of citation auctions that are introduced as a new approach to selecting scientific papers for publication. Unlike the state of the art in paper selection that relies on peer reviews, our main idea is to use an auction in which bids consist of the number of citations that an author expects to receive if the paper is published. Hence, a citation auction is the selection process itself, and no reviewers are involved. The benefits of the proposed approach are two-fold. First, the cost of refereeing will be either totally eliminated or significantly reduced, because the process of citation auction does not need prior understanding of the paper's content to judge the quality of its contribution. Additionally, the method does not prejudge the content of the paper, so it will increase the openness of publications to new ideas. Second, scientists will be much more committed to the quality of their submitted papers, paying close attention to distributing and explaining their papers in detail to maximize the number of citations that the paper receives when published. Sample analyses of the number of citations collected via Google scholar for papers published in years 1999-2004 in a series of proceedings, and in years 2003-2005 in a series of conferences (in a totally different discipline) are provided. Finally, a simple simulation of an auction is given to outline the behaviour of the citation auction approach.
ACCESSION #
36120679

 

Related Articles

  • YOUR MOST IMPACTFUL PUBLICATION CAN COME AT ANY TIME. S. K. B. // Physics Today;Jan2017, Vol. 70 Issue 1, p23 

    The article cites a study that was published in the journal "Science" which assesses the impact of a scientific publication by scientists based on the number of the cumulative number of citations it received in the first 10 years after publication.

  • The reference: more than a buttress of the scientific edifice. Schott, G.D. // Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine;Apr2003, Vol. 96 Issue 4, p191 

    The article examines the development and the applications, misapplications and abuses of references in scientific publications. References have originated as devices to communicate, prioritize, attribute and protect, but they have also shown human frailties such as jealousy, laziness, dishonesty...

  • Assessing the scientific relevance of a single publication over time. Bloching, Philipp A.; Heinzl, Harald // South African Journal of Science;Sep/Oct2013, Vol. 109 Issue 9/10, p1 

    Quantitatively assessing the scientific relevance of a research paper is challenging for two reasons. Firstly, scientific relevance may change over time, and secondly, it is unclear how to evaluate a recently published paper. The temporally averaged paper-specific impact factor is defined as the...

  • Copied citations give impact factors a boost. Clarke, Tom // Nature;5/22/2003, Vol. 423 Issue 6938, p373 

    Reports that scientific papers that are not widely read and that lack any great influence can end up being classed as high-impact. Papers in question not read by the authors before citing; Generation of a mathematical model to predict citation levels; Outcome of the model to be similar for...

  • Paper trail reveals references go unread by citing authors. Ball, Philip // Nature;12/12/2002, Vol. 420 Issue 6916, p594 

    Cites a study showing that many of the references cited in scientific papers have not been read by the authors citing them. Propagation of errors in citations in scientific literature.

  • Indexation and/or Citation of Journals/Articles/Authors in the Scientific Validation System. Boric, Vesna // Acta Stomatologica Croatica;2010, Vol. 44 Issue 3, p138 

    The article focuses on criteria used in selecting and validating authors and articles for secondary publications. These publications are intended to inform readers on the reference sources used by the author and on marks distinguishing the ideas of the author from other researchers. The...

  • Ranking journals: could Google Scholar Metrics be an alternative to Journal Citation Reports and Scimago Journal Rank? Delgado-López-Cózar, Emilio; Cabezas-Clavijo, Álvaro // Learned Publishing;Apr2013, Vol. 26 Issue 2, p101 

    The launch of Google Scholar Metrics as a tool for assessing scientific journals may be serious competition for Thomson Reuters' Journal Citation Reports, and for the Scopus-powered Scimago Journal Rank. A review of these bibliometric journal evaluation products is performed. We compare their...

  • Developing a guideline to standardize the citation of bioresources in journal articles (CoBRA). Rossi, Anna Maria // European Science Editing;May2015, Vol. 41 Issue 2, p54 

    A review of the article "Developing a guideline to standardize the citation of bioresources in journal articles (CoBRA)" by E. Bravo and others, which appeared in a 2015 issue of the periodical "BMC Medicine," is presented.

  • How To Get The Most Out Of SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE. Despopoulos, A. // BioScience;Feb1964, Vol. 14 Issue 2, p15 

    The article offers suggestions for biological scientists on how to gather instructive and informative materials from a large volume of available scientific publications with the less use of resources. It states that a useful technique is to scan both ends of an article disregarding the text...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics