TITLE

Defense Costs and Insurer Reserves in Medical Malpractice and Other Personal Injury Cases: Evidence from Texas, 1988-2004

AUTHOR(S)
Black, Bernard; Hyman, David A.; Silver, Charles; Sage, William M.
PUB. DATE
September 2008
SOURCE
American Law & Economics Review;Fall2008, Vol. 10 Issue 2, p185
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
We study defense costs for commercially insured personal injury tori claims in Texas over 1988-2004, and insurer reserves for those costs. We rely on detailed case-level data on defense legal fees and expenses, and Texas state bar data on lawyers' hourly rates. We study medical malpractice ("med mal") cases in detail, and other types of cases in less detail. Controlling for payouts, real defense costs in med mal cases rise by 4.6 percent per year, roughly doubling over this period. The rate of increase is similar for legal fees and for other expenses. Real hourly rates for personal injury defense counsel are flat. Defense costs in med mal cases correlate strongly with payouts, both in ordinary least squares (OLS) and in an instrumental variable analysis. They also correlate with the stage at which a case is resolved, and case duration. Mean duration declined over time. Med mal insurers predominantly use outside counsel. Case-level variation in initial expense reserves predicts a small fraction of actual defense costs. In other areas of tort litigation (auto, general commercial, multi-peril, and other professional liability), defense costs rose by 2.2 percent per year. Defense costs in these cases are predicted by the same factors as in med mal cases, plus the presence of multiple defendants. Insurer reserving practices raise some puzzles. Med mal insurers did not react to the sustained rise in defense costs by adjusting their expense reserves, either in real dollars or relative to reserves for payouts. Thus, expense reserves declined substantially relative to defense costs. In other litigation areas, expense reserves rose along with defense costs.
ACCESSION #
36000403

 

Related Articles

  • Insurers use the 'compensation culture' myth to help check the rise of legitimate PI claims. Merriman, Tony // Lawyer;3/14/2005, Vol. 19 Issue 10, p14 

    This article presents views of the author who is a personal injury (PI) lawyer about the so-called "compensation culture" myth that insurance firms use to help check the rise of legitimate PI claims. The author believes that there is scope for lawyers and insurance companies to make a real...

  • Insurers' Legal Costs Going Up. Seol, Kap Su // National Underwriter / Life & Health Financial Services;11/13/2000, Vol. 104 Issue 46, p38 

    Reports on the results of a study conducted by KPMG LLP on the costs of legal service provided by in-house attorneys of insurance companies. Percentage of corporate attorneys that confirm the increase in legal costs; Types of litigation handled by in-house lawyers; Other findings of the study.

  • Panel Suggests Means To Curb Insurance Costs. Tugend, Alina // Education Week;4/2/1986, Vol. 5 Issue 28, p12 

    The article reports on the recommendation of a Reagan Administration task force regarding the imposition of limits on lawyers' fees and punitive-damage awards in the U.S. This move is aimed at addressing the rapidly expanding liability-insurance crisis. The task force, the Tort Policy Working...

  • 'No win, no fee' rules shake-up. Gainsbury, Sally // Public Finance;8/19/2005, p15 

    Reports on the move by Great Britain's Department of Constitutional Affairs to simplify the rules surrounding "no win, no fee" court cases. Admission that the claims structure was too complex for claimants to understand; Positive response to the development from the public sector union Unison;...

  • PI success fee uplift slashed by 15 per cent. Malkin, Brendan // Lawyer;9/9/2002, Vol. 16 Issue 36, p2 

    Reports the court ruling on reducing the success fee uplift of Personal Injury lawyers.

  • Insult to injury. Eaton, George // New Statesman;6/6/2011, Vol. 140 Issue 5056, p12 

    The article discusses reforms to Great Britain's conditional fee agreement system for personal injury claims and discusses statistics indicating that most "no win, no fee" claimants are middle class citizens.

  • The med-mal industry lashes back. Guglielmo, Wayne J. // Medical Economics;11/18/2005, Vol. 82 Issue 22, p21 

    Focuses on the current state of medical malpractice insurance industry in the U.S. Increase in insurance collection in premiums despite flat payout trends; Slew in actual payouts in a given year and their estimated payouts for future years; Accumulation of insurers with record amounts of surplus.

  • Producers See No 'Free-For-All' ... Yet. Ruquet, Mark E. // National Underwriter / P&C;5/24/2004, Vol. 108 Issue 20, p23 

    Reports that insurance companies, brokers, and agents see moderation or softening in pricing in the United States, while a few lines remain difficult to place. Workers' compensation; Specialty liability; Property continues to soften more than casualty; Directors and officers; Medical...

  • Trial lawyers push for legislation hiking insurance rates. Horner, Mike // Business Journal Serving Fresno & the Central San Joaquin Valley;08/09/99, Issue 322496, p31 

    Relates that California's personal injury lawyers and their allies in the legislature are close to enacting a law that would raise all consumers' insurance premiums. Proposal that seeks to expand a lawyer's ability to sue liability insurers; Impact of the bill on consumers.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics