TITLE

Impact of Cochlear Implantation on Speech Understanding, Depression, and Loneliness in the Elderly

AUTHOR(S)
Poissant, Sarah F.; Beaudoin, Francesca; Jiayi Huang; Brodsky, Jacob; Lee, Daniel J.
PUB. DATE
August 2008
SOURCE
Journal of Otolaryngology -- Head & Neck Surgery;Aug2008, Vol. 37 Issue 4, p488
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Objective: To compare speech understanding ability, the level of depression, and the degree of loneliness experienced by elderly cochlear implant (CI) users (≥ 70 years), adult CI users (≤ 60 years), and elderly hearing aid (HA) users (≥ 70 years). Design: Clinical study. Setting: Tertiary academic neuro-otologic and audiologic centre. Methods: Three groups of patients were enrolled: (1) nine unilateral CI users 70 years or older at the time of implantation (mean 77.7 years), (2} eight unilateral CI users 60 years or younger at the time of implantation (mean 51.1 years), and (3) nine bilateral HA users 70 years or older mean 77.5 years). Subjects underwent speech perception testing and completed two scales regarding their perceived levels of depression (pre-/post-CI) and feelings of loneliness (pre-/post-CI). Main Outcome Measure: Speech understanding scores in quiet and in noise and quality of life indicators (UCLA Loneliness Questionnaire, Geriatric Depression Screening Scale). Results: There were no perioperative complications. No significant differences in speech understanding ability in quiet or in noise between elderly and younger CI patients were observed (p < .05). Cochlear implantation decreased perceived depression in elderly recipients and loneliness in both elderly and younger recipients. Finally, elderly CI users were no more depressed or lonely than their age-matched peers with mild-to-moderate hearing loss who use HAs. Conclusions: Cochlear implantation in elderly patients results in speech perception abilities comparable to those of younger CI recipients, as well as measurable improvements in depression and loneliness.
ACCESSION #
35942354

 

Related Articles

  • The relationship between the speech perception and the degree of satisfaction among adult users of cochlear implants. Soares Granço, Fernanda; Freitas Fernandes, Nayara; Morettin, Marina; Costa Filho, Orozimbo Alves; Bevilacqua, Maria Cecília // International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology;Apr-Jun2013, Vol. 17 Issue 2, p202 

    Introduction: In recent years, the benefits associated with the use of cochlear implants (CIs), especially with regard to speech perception, have proven to surpass those produced by the use of hearing aids, making CIs a highly efficient resource for patients with severe/profound hearing loss....

  • Implanting outside the Guidelines: A Case Study. Seymour, Millicent K.; Lundy, Larry // Journal of the American Academy of Audiology;Mar2008, Vol. 19 Issue 3, p197 

    An 81-year-old female was referred for cochlear implantation due to difficulty communicating in her daily activities despite the use of appropriate amplification. The poorer ear was unable to tolerate amplification for the past 15 years. The open-set sentence-recognition test score in quiet in...

  • Quality of Life Measurements after Cochlear Implantation. Loeffler, Christoph; Aschendorff, Antje; Burger, Thorsten; Kroeger, Stefanie; Laszig, Roland; Arndt, Susan // Open Otorhinolaryngology Journal;2010, Vol. 4, p47 

    Cochlear implantation has a remarkable impact on the social life, activities and self-esteem of each patient. In order to objectify this comprehensive effect the term quality of life has been introduced. Various questionnaires have been developed to assess the quality of life in such patients....

  • Masking of Tinnitus through a Cochlear Implant. Vernon, Jack A. // Journal of the American Academy of Audiology;Jun2000, Vol. 11 Issue 6 

    The relief of tinnitus has been effected in a cochlear-implant patient by presenting masking sounds to the microphone of the implant. Oddly enough, the presence of the masking sound improved the clarity of speech and music.

  • Effect of single-channel compression on temporal speech information. Souza, Pamela E.; Turner, Christopher W. // Journal of Speech & Hearing Research;Oct96, Vol. 39 Issue 5, p901 

    Determines the effect of single-channel amplitude compression systems in hearing aids. Use of speech information by listeners with hearing impairment; Focus on temporal cues; Assessment of speech recognition scores; Testing using signal-correlated noise stimuli.

  • Effects of single-band syllabic amplitude compression on temporal speech information in nonsense... Van Tasell, Dianne J.; Trine, Timothy D. // Journal of Speech & Hearing Research;Oct96, Vol. 39 Issue 5, p912 

    Assesses the effects of single-band amplitude compression systems of hearing aids on subjects with normal hearing. Use of speech stimuli that was processed to remove spectral information; Differences among usage of temporal information for speech identification.

  • Cochlear implantation in the elderly: surgical and hearing outcomes. Alice, Benatti; Silvia, Montino; Laura, Girasoli; Patrizia, Trevisi; Roberto, Bovo // BMC Surgery;2013, Vol. 13 Issue Suppl 2, p1 

    Background: At the present time, 50 to 60% of the population above 70 years of age suffers from a hearing impairment and from 0.6 to 1.1% has a severe to profound loss, which cannot benefit from an hearing aid. Moreover, it is expected that this prevalence will grow by more than two-fold in the...

  • Bilateral or unilateral cochlear implantation for deaf children: an observational study. Lovett, R. E. S.; Kitterick, P. T.; Hewitt, C. E.; Summerfield, A. Q. // Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition;Feb2010, Vol. 95 Issue 2, p7 

    Objective Cochlear implantation in one ear (unilateral implantation) has been the standard treatment for severe-profound childhood deafness. We assessed whether cochlear implantation in both ears (bilateral implantation) is associated with better listening skills, higher health-related quality...

  • Hearing Performance in Noise of Chochlear Implant Patients versus Severely-Profoundly Hearing-Impaired Patients with Hearing Aids. Hamzavi, Jafar; Franz, Peter; Baumgartner, Wolf Dieter; Gstoettner, Wolfgang // Audiology: Journal of Auditory Communication;Jan/Feb2001, Vol. 40 Issue 1, p26 

    It is possible for most post-lingually deaf patients to attain significant open speech recognition following cochlear implantation. In contrast, many severely-profoundly sensorineural hearing-impaired patients receive no benefit from their hearing aids, especially in situations with background...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics