TITLE

Marriage Tax Repeal Veto Keeps Plans Safe For Now

AUTHOR(S)
Jones, Chuck
PUB. DATE
September 2000
SOURCE
Advisor Today;Sep2000, Vol. 95 Issue 9, p32
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports that United States President Bill Clinton veto the repeal of the so-called marriage penalty. Stipulation to the marriage tax legislation; Statement from President Clinton; Percentage of married couples that will be affected by the marriage tax repeal; Example of how the marriage penalty works.
ACCESSION #
3580366

 

Related Articles

  • Hoekstra Terms Tax-Cut Veto 'Reluctant' Payne, Scott // Grand Rapids Business Journal;08/14/2000, Vol. 18 Issue 33, p16 

    Reports on Congressman Peter Hoekstra's belief that United States President Bill Clinton was uncomfortable in vetoing the so-called marriage penalty tax. Possibility that Clinton might sign a revised bill; Large number of Democrats in Congress that voted with the Republicans to eliminate the...

  • Married filing separate returns. Rothberg, Arthur F. // CPA Journal;Oct96, Vol. 66 Issue 10, p44 

    Provides guidance on how split income and deductions of married couple filing separate income tax returns should be handled. Deciding on the best filing status to use; Problems from separate filing; Advantages of separate filing; Accounting for exemptions and deductions; Estimated tax payments.

  • Joint and several liability. Turville, Mary // National Public Accountant;Aug96, Vol. 41 Issue 8, p10 

    Responds to readers' questions about the joint and several liability tax rule for married couples. How a spouse can be relieved of joint and several liability; Innocent spouse rule; Injured spouse; Proposed `proportionate liabilty standard.'

  • Until taxes do us part. Kreider, Sharon // Outlook;Spring91, Vol. 59 Issue 1, p56 

    Examines the burden tax law imposes on married couples. Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1990; 1991 law's provision discriminating against married working couples; Cost for being married.

  • The marriage tax penalty: Inequities and tax planning opportunities. Brozovsky, John; Cataldo, A.J. // Ohio CPA Journal;Dec93, Vol. 52 Issue 6, p21 

    Discusses the marriage tax penalty (MTP) as the additional federal income tax paid by married couples over what would be paid by two single individuals having the same combined income and deductions. Marriage tax `bonus' (MTB); Background; Identifying MTP's and MTB's; Hypothetical fact pattern.

  • The marriage tax (penalty)/bonus by income and allocation between spouses/singles (1993).  // Ohio CPA Journal;Dec93, Vol. 52 Issue 6, p22 

    Presents a chart illustrating marriage tax bonus's result when income is earned by only one of the spouses.

  • Love is ... a taxable event?  // Accountancy;Mar1981, Vol. 92 Issue 1051, p16 

    Outlines key points presented at an Institute for Fiscal Studies conference on the taxation of husband and wife in Great Britain. Historic development of husband and wife taxation; Pros and cons of reforming the system; Alternatives to husband and wife taxation.

  • Qualifying as the innocent spouse. Knight, Ray A.; Lee, Philip K. // National Public Accountant;Feb94, Vol. 39 Issue 2, p19 

    Reports on innocent spouse rules and tax liability. Tax Court's narrow view of innocent spouse rules; Removal of dollar limitations and `no basis in fact or law' requirement for disallowed claims of deduction, credit or basis.

  • IRS can sell survivorship interest.  // Practical Accountant;Aug96, Vol. 29 Issue 8, p24 

    Presents a court ruling stating that a district court can enjoin the forced sale of a husband's right to use and occupy the couple's personal residence but cannot enjoin the government from conveying the husband's survivorship to pay his delinquent taxes.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics