TITLE

The Supreme Court 2000: A Symposium

AUTHOR(S)
George, Robert P.
PUB. DATE
October 2000
SOURCE
First Things: A Monthly Journal of Religion & Public Life;Oct2000, Issue 106, p33
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Discusses the United States Supreme Court's ruling on the law enacted by the state of Colorado prohibiting any person within a hundred feet of an abortion clinic to approach another person to hand a leaflet or display a sign. Legitimacy of the Colorado statute; Critics of the regime of judicial rule; Underlying liberal moral-political issues; Decision on laws against partial-birth abortion.
ACCESSION #
3577884

 

Related Articles

  • U. S. porn statute ruled invalid; busts continue.  // Advocate;11/25/70, Vol. 4 Issue 20, p6 

    Reports the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court on a pornographic federal statute. Ban on the importance of transportation of obscene materials by means of a common carrier; Involvement of the statues in the indictment of several persons in Los Angeles; Assertion that the ruling brought dismissal...

  • WEEK IN WASHINGTON.  // BioWorld Insight;4/2/2012, Vol. 20 Issue 14, p6 

    The article offers news brief as of April 2012 on topics including the mandating of cardiovascular outcomes trials for all obesity drugs, passing of Jumpstart Our Business Startups (JOBS) Act by the U.S. Senate and House and the remanding of "The Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad...

  • REASONABLE INVESTMENT-BACKED EXPECTATIONS: SHOULD NOTICE OF RISING SEAS LEAD TO FALLING EXPECTATIONS FOR COASTAL PROPERTY PURCHASERS? RUPPERT, THOMAS // Journal of Land Use & Environmental Law;Spring2011, Vol. 26 Issue 2, p239 

    The article focuses on the regulatory law reasonable investment-backed expectations (RIBE). It states about the impact and future of statutory liquidity ratio. It informs about development of regulatory takings and about the evolution of RIBE at the level of the U.S. Supreme Court. It further...

  • SUPREME COURT VICTORY FOR NIGERIAN FAMILIES IN DRUG SUIT.  // New York Amsterdam News;7/1/2010, Vol. 100 Issue 27, p2 

    The article reports on the rejection of the U.S. Supreme Court on the attempt of Pfizer Inc. to block the Nigerians from suing them under the Alien Tort Statute base allegedly on illegal trial of antibiotics.

  • Cross-Jurisdictional Remands. Wall, Jeffrey B. // University of Chicago Law Review;Spring2003, Vol. 70 Issue 2, p689 

    Explores the propriety and wisdom of cross-jurisdictional remands in the U.S. Description of the various contexts in which courts can be presented with the opportunity to order cross-jurisdictional remand and the legal consequences of courts' procedural choices; Explanation why interpreting the...

  • LESSONS FROM PHARAOH AND THE HEBREW MIDWIVES: CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTION TO STATE MANDATES AS A FREE EXERCISE RIGHT. O'Callaghan, Nora // Creighton Law Review;Apr2006, Vol. 39 Issue 3, p561 

    The article presents the author's contention over the pressure of regulatory laws in the U.S. requiring religious believers to engage in conduct forbidden by their religion. It draws the centrality of avoiding sinful behavior to the free exercise claims for religious exemptions. It also examines...

  • Abortion Chronology.  // Congressional Digest;Jun2003, Vol. 82 Issue 6, p163 

    Presents the major judicial and legislative actions related to abortion in the U.S. Court cases on abortion; Provisions of the Missouri statute by the Supreme Court; Prohibitions of any funds in the Welfare Appropriation Act.

  • Taking the ammunition away from the `war on drugs': A double jeopardy bar to 21 U.S.C....881... Dallet, Rebecca Frank // Case Western Reserve Law Review;Fall93, Vol. 44 Issue 1, p235 

    Opinion. Examines the United States federal civil drug forfeiture statute and its application on a Supreme Court Case filed by Richard Lyle Austin. Analysis of the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment; Court's interpretation of the statute; Prevention of the Double Jeopardy Clause by...

  • High Court Hears Case With Big Stakes For HMOs. Brostoff, Steven // National Underwriter / Life & Health Financial Services;1/20/2003, Vol. 107 Issue 3, p35 

    Focuses on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court on the statute requiring health maintenance organizations and managed care organizations to offer contracts to physicians and health care providers. Impact of the statute on the insurance industry; Implications of the court decision for health...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sign out of this library

Other Topics