TITLE

The Politics of the Ontario Labour Relations Act: Business, Labour, and Government in the Consolidation of Post-War Industrial Relations, 1949-1961

AUTHOR(S)
Smith, Charles W.
PUB. DATE
November 2008
SOURCE
Labour / Le Travail;Fall2008, Vol. 62, p109
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The Ontario Labour Relations Act (OLRA) has long dictated the legal relationship between trade unions and employers in the province. Although subject to years of delay, when the provincial government introduced the OLRA in 1950, its official stance on labour relations was a "hands off" program that was designed to leave collective bargaining to the participants. Often defined as industrial pluralism, this new legal regime was supposed to have been crafted in the name of "fairness and balance" in which trade unions abandoned previous militancy for state-sponsored freedoms. Upon closer examination, however, the provincial government's approach to industrial pluralism was much less hands off than has previously been assumed. Rather, the entrenchment of collective bargaining in Ontario was closely aligned with the class interests of Ontario businesses. Through an examination of the politics surrounding OLRA, this article argues that Teslie Frost's Conservative government structured the Act in order to appease employer demands surrounding increased legal regulation of collective bargaining and union organizing, which limited the extension of unionization throughout the province. In making this observation, the article maintains that the Conservative regime of industrial pluralism was both the by-product and the purveyor of ongoing class antagonism throughout the 1950s.
ACCESSION #
35709063

 

Related Articles

  • The Gwynne bill.  // America;3/15/1947, Vol. 76 Issue 24, p652 

    The article comments on the passing of Gwynne Bill on February 28, 1947 in the U.S. House of Representatives. He notes that the federal law threatens the effectiveness of Davis-Bacon Act, the Walsh-Healy Act and the Fair Labor Standards Act. He cites the controversial section of the bill as well...

  • LABOUR LAW CASES.  // Eastern Worker;Jul/Aug2015, Vol. 55 Issue 4, p11 

    The article discusses the constitutionality of the 2012 Industrial Relations Act that was enacted to handle the formation of trade unions and industrial dispute settlements in Islamabad, Pakistan and handles issues related to the rights of workmen.

  • "RIGHT-TO-WORK" ACT UPHELD.  // Labor Law Journal;Jan50, Vol. 1 Issue 4, p318 

    The article reports that the so-called "right-to-work" statute under which Arkansas, in effect, forbids the use of force or violence to prevent non-strikers from working, and which also bans assembling for that purpose near any place where a labor dispute exists, was held constitutional by the...

  • LEGAL MOBILIZATION BY TRADE UNIONS: THE CASE OF SHANGHAI. Feng Chen // China Journal;Jul2004, Issue 52, p27 

    Analyzes legal mobilization by trade unions in Shanghai, China. Types of legal mobilization in the Western literature; Information on legal mobilization as a union strategy; Statistics on labor disputes mediated at Shanghai enterprises from 1995 to 2000.

  • UNION AID TO EMPLOYER'S COMPETITOR.  // Labor Law Journal;Oct50, Vol. 1 Issue 13, p1057 

    The article reports that an employer in the U.S. was not relieved of his duty to bargain with a labor union by reason of the fact that union had furnished to the employer's competitors a list of the employer's customers "which might be solicited," since the employer had not objected to the...

  • Neutrality and Secondary Boycotts: An Economic Evaluation of a Legal Question. Borus, Michael E.; Warshal, Bruce S. // Labor Law Journal;May66, Vol. 17 Issue 5, p310 

    This article argues for greater use of economic theory to solve legal questions which deal with economic subject matter. To demonstrate the validity of their argument, the authors apply simple price theory to the question of neutrality in secondary boycotts. The findings from this analysis...

  • Freedom of Speech v. Disruptive Nuisance: How Does an Employer Deal with Noisy Picketers' Right to Support Their Union? McDaniel, Theresa Y. // Venulex Legal Summaries;2005 Q3, p1 

    The article analyzes ways on how employers would deal with picketers' right to demonstrate support to a labor union in the U.S. The National Labor Relations Act defines how far union activities could go as it prohibits them from coercing neutral employers to stop doing business with employers...

  • United front emerges in courts dispute.  // Public Finance;12/2/2005, p16 

    The article reports the senior civil servants have joined the fast-escalating row over a delayed pay deal for magistrates' court staff that could end in strikes during the run-up to Christmas in Great Britain. The union claimed that negotiations provide an inflation-proof pay offer had reached...

  • The law looks at labor. Masse, Benjamin L. // America;7/14/1951, Vol. 85 Issue 15, p378 

    The article presents several cases decided in response to the Taft-Hartley Act of the U.S. Unions cannot strike against an employer to oblige him to stop doing business with another employer as this action is a secondary boycott under the Act. In the case of Prinz Leather Co., the Act gives the...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics