Coercion and undue influence in decisions to participate in psychiatric research -- conceptual issues

Appelbaum, Paul
January 2007
BMC Psychiatry;2007 Supplement 1, Vol. 7, Special section p1
Academic Journal
The essential elements of informed consent to research include the provision of relevant information to a person who is competent to make a decision, and who is situated so as to be able to do so voluntarily. The nature of the requirement of voluntariness has been resistant to exploration. Concerns about voluntariness are usually invoked under the rubrics of coercion or undue influence. Coercion can be conceptualized as the use of morally unjustified threats to bring a person to consent to research participation. Undue influence in the research context typically involves the use of affirmative inducements to persuade a person to ignore what would otherwise be their preferences regarding research participation. Talcott Parsons noted four means by which influence may be exercised, involving respectively the use of appeals to shared goals, inducement, persuasion, and power. In the context of human subjects research, evocation of shared goals may be manifest by appeals to altruism; inducement by offers to provide incentives; persuasion by the application of interpersonal pressure or by an exhortation to self-interest; and power by the issuance of threats. Appeals to altruism, if honestly framed, are unlikely ever to constitute illegitimate constraints on choice, but the other categories can be more problematic. A final component of this conceptualization of voluntariness is the recognition that constraints on decision-making can be actual or perceived. Actual offers, pressure, or threats reflect the behavior of other people who are trying to affect the subject's decision. However, there is often a dichotomy between the behaviors of others and a subject's perception of those behaviors. Hence, both actual and perceived constraint are relevant. Perceptions are the mediating variable between behaviors of others and their impact on subjects' decisions; this approach has proven fruitful in studies of voluntariness in other contexts.


Related Articles

  • Coercion and undue influence in decisions to participate in psychiatric research -- methodological issues. Klitzman, Robert // BMC Psychiatry;2007 Supplement 1, Vol. 7, Special section p1 

    We are currently developing and testing an instrument that can potentially open up voluntariness to further study and reasoned policy-making. To substantiate the necessity and usefulness of efforts to protect the voluntariness of consent requires a valid and reliable way of assessing such...

  • Coercion and undue influence in decisions to participate in psychiatric research -- research findings. Lidz, Charles // BMC Psychiatry;2007 Supplement 1, Vol. 7, Special section p1 

    Research on coercion in research contexts is almost unknown. Much of the difficulty is conceptual and methodological. We do not have general agreement on what should be counted as coercive in a research context and how it should be measured. This paper will review the limited data on the subject...

  • "Trust Me, I'm Your Husband": Undue Influence and Royal Bank of Scotland v Etridge. Allan, Barry // Otago Law Review;2006, Vol. 11 Issue 2, p247 

    The article focuses on the conditions under the trust me legal case which involve a guarantor and debtor in establishing undue influence. For an undue influence to take effect, there must be overt exercise of power and a group of essentially fiduciary relationships. Undue influence is intended...

  • Choices, Interests, and Potentiality: What Distinguishes Bearers of Rights? Andersson, Anna-Karin // Journal of Value Inquiry;Sep2013, Vol. 47 Issue 3, p175 

    The article offers the author's view regarding the demarcation on the class of subjects who are bearers of rights. She deals on the urgency and undue proliferation of rights bearers. She examines the criteria of a plausible solution to the problem. She proposes that the possession of the...

  • ConsideraÅ£ii privind intenÅ£ia de colaborare în afaceri (affectio societatis). POPESCU-CRUCERU, Anca // Romanian Statistical Review;2013, Issue Sup, p207 

    In terms of intrinsic content, affectio societatis (also called „animus societatis") expresses a psychological element belonging to the internal will, that is outsourced by expressing consent to the formation of a company, in decision-making and control of the bussines. This implies...

  • Big shots. Kroninger, Stephen; Buck, Chris // New York;12/22/97, Vol. 30 Issue 49, p68 

    Looks at the people in New York City, New York who have influence and who have used in well in 1997. The money people like George Soros, Ted Turner and Brooke Astor; The people with vision or power; Profiles.

  • 5 WAYS TO BE MORE PERSUASIVE. Kawasaki, Guy // Smart Business Orange County;May2012, Vol. 7 Issue 1, p6 

    The article presents tips on being more persuasive and influential. It is suggested that too many choices frustrate people, therefore, one should not offer too many of them. Other tips include--being the first to give, arguing against self-interest, and making people feel that they have...

  • An Exploration of Ethical Decision-making Processes in the United States and Egypt. Beekun, Rafik; Hamdy, Ramda; Westerman, James; HassabElnaby, Hassan // Journal of Business Ethics;Oct2008, Vol. 82 Issue 3, p587 

    In this comparative survey of 191 Egyptian and 92 U.S. executives, we explore the relationship between national culture and ethical decision-making within the context of business. Using Reidenbach and Robin’s (1988) multi-criteria ethics instrument, we examine how differences on two of...

  • Evaluating Adolescent Decision Making in Legal Contexts. Scott, Elizabeth S.; Reppucci, N. Dickon; Woolard, Jennifer L. // Law & Human Behavior (Springer Science & Business Media B.V.);Jun1995, Vol. 19 Issue 3, p221 

    Challenges the use by policy researchers of a model for comparing adolescent and adult decision making that is based on informed consent standards. An expanded decision-making framework designed to evaluate "judgment" in adults and adolescents can better test the empirical basis of paternalistic...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics