TITLE

The influence of a systematic risk assessment and a training course in aggression management on seclusion rates in Switzerland: a multi center study

AUTHOR(S)
Needham, Ian; Abderhalden, Christoph
PUB. DATE
January 2007
SOURCE
BMC Psychiatry;2007 Supplement 1, Vol. 7, Special section p1
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Background To explore the influence of a systematic risk assessment and a training course in aggression management on seclusion rates in Switzerland. Methods We conducted a multi-center partially randomized controlled trial on 24 acute psychiatric admission wards in the German speaking region of Switzerland. The wards were cluster randomized into 5 study arms (training course, systematic risk assessment, systematic risk assessment and training course combined, control group, preference wards utilizing only the systematic risk assessment). Aggressive incidents and coercive measures (seclusion, involuntary medication, and fixation) were recorded at pre and post intervention. Results We recorded 1,256 coercive measures in 81,255 treatment days of the trial. 1,134 coercive measures were administered in conjunction with aggressive behavior. In the preference arm the coercion rates fell from1.432 (95% CI 1.160 - 1.749) to 0.552 (95% CI 0.402 - 0.788) per 100 treatment days. A significant drop in coercion rates per 1000 treatment days were recorded on the wards having introduced the training course (pre test 23.81, 95% CI = 20.98 - 26.93 versus 17.699, 95% CI = 14.908 - 20.865 post test) and on the risk assessment preference wards test (15.811, 95% CI = 12.945 - 19.128 versus 6.265, 95% CI = 4.515 - 8.468). The main reasons for seclusion were the reduction of stimuli (498), treatment refusal (474), danger to others (460), and aggressive behavior (306). Conclusion A systematic risk assessment (preference arm) and a training course in aggression management are effective in reducing seclusion in psychiatric acute admission wards. The other two interventions (a systematic risk assessment alone and in combination with a training course) have no influence on seclusion rates. The preference arm wards faired well on the reduction of all coercive measures and seclusion. This finding may point to the possible role of motivation as a key factor in the reduction of coercion.
ACCESSION #
35704307

 

Related Articles

  • 1-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial comparing seclusion and mechanical restraint in people with serious mental illness. Bergk, Jan; Birk, Michael; Steinert, Tilman // BMC Psychiatry;2007 Supplement 1, Vol. 7, Special section p1 

    Background Seclusion and mechanical restraint are widely used for people with serious mental disorders. In most countries one intervention is preferred while the other is considered as inhuman or not sufficiently safe, but identical arguments refer to different preferences. There is a lack of...

  • Aggression and seclusion on acute psychiatric wards: effect of short-term risk assessment. Van de Sande, R.; Nijman, H. L. I.; Noorthoorn, E. O.; Wierdsma, A. I.; Hellendoorn, E.; van der Staak, C.; Mulder, C. L. // British Journal of Psychiatry;Dec2011, Vol. 199 Issue 6, p473 

    Background Short-term structured risk assessment is presumed to reduce incidents of aggression and seclusion on acute psychiatric wards. Controlled studies of this approach are scarce. Aims To evaluate the effect of risk assessment on the number of aggression incidents and time in seclusion for...

  • Central ethical issues in coercive treatment of children and adolescents, with special reference to the reasoning of the staff members. Thorsén, Håkan // BMC Psychiatry;2007 Supplement 1, Vol. 7, Special section p1 

    Background The aim of the study was to describe the child and adolescent psychiatric staff opinions about ethical problems in relation to coercion, with specific focus on the ethical justification of different forms of coercion. Methods Two empirical studies were made. The first study used an...

  • A comparison between seven Swiss and seven German hospitals concerning the use of coercive measures. Bernhardsgrütter, Renate // BMC Psychiatry;2007 Supplement 1, Vol. 7, Special section p1 

    Background In 2004, two independent working groups in Germany and Switzerland compared the frequency and duration of coercive measures in standard psychiatric care across 14 psychiatric hospitals in Germany and Switzerland. The objective was to establish an international knowledge transfer...

  • Legislation and practice of coercive measures during in-patient treatment in 12 European countries: results of a case vignette study. Steinert, Tilman; Lepping, Peter; Needham, Ian // BMC Psychiatry;2007 Supplement 1, Vol. 7, Special section p1 

    Background Patients who exhibit violent behavior or refuse medication during in-patient treatment are a challenge for clinical management. The management of those clinical situations is different in European countries with respect to legislation and clinical routine. Methods We selected three...

  • Patients' experiences of coercive treatment and coercive measures in psychiatric care. Wallsten, Tuula; Kjellin, Lars // BMC Psychiatry;2007 Supplement 1, Vol. 7, Special section p1 

    Background To study coercive treatment like forced medication and coercive measures like seclusion and mechanical restraint during inpatient psychiatric care among committed and voluntarily admitted patients and also to study patients attitudes to coercive treatment and measures. Methods A...

  • Epidemiology of inpatient violence and coercive measures. Steinert, Tilman // BMC Psychiatry;2007 Supplement 1, Vol. 7, Special section p1 

    Objective To give an overview of the current knowledge on the epidemiology of in-patient violence and coercive measures in clinical psychiatry. Methods Many studies have been conducted on the epidemiology of in-patient violence by use of standardized scales such as the SOAS-R. Much research on...

  • The use of seclusion and restraint during 15 years -- a nationwide study in Finland. Keski-Valkama, Alice; Sailas, Eila; Eronen, Markku; Lönnqvist, Jouko; Kaltiala-Heino, Riittakerttu // BMC Psychiatry;2007 Supplement 1, Vol. 7, Special section p1 

    Background Internationally, concerns over the use of seclusion and restraint in psychiatric care have increased over the past decades. In Finland, restriction of freedom and use of coercion in psychiatry are regulated by the Mental Health Act of 1991. After its implementation, the Act (revision...

  • Patients' view of seclusion -- preliminary report. Keski-Valkama, Alice; Eronen, Markku; Kaltiala-Heino, Riittakerttu // BMC Psychiatry;2007 Supplement 1, Vol. 7, Special section p1 

    Background Seclusion, putting a patient involuntarily alone in a locked unfurnished room from which she/he cannot freely exit, is a prevailing coercive measure in modern psychiatric practice. In recent years, clinical, ethical, and legal debate has increased awareness of its controversial...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics