TITLE

The influence of a systematic risk assessment and a training course in aggression management on seclusion rates in Switzerland: a multi center study

AUTHOR(S)
Needham, Ian; Abderhalden, Christoph
PUB. DATE
January 2007
SOURCE
BMC Psychiatry;2007 Supplement 1, Vol. 7, Special section p1
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Background To explore the influence of a systematic risk assessment and a training course in aggression management on seclusion rates in Switzerland. Methods We conducted a multi-center partially randomized controlled trial on 24 acute psychiatric admission wards in the German speaking region of Switzerland. The wards were cluster randomized into 5 study arms (training course, systematic risk assessment, systematic risk assessment and training course combined, control group, preference wards utilizing only the systematic risk assessment). Aggressive incidents and coercive measures (seclusion, involuntary medication, and fixation) were recorded at pre and post intervention. Results We recorded 1,256 coercive measures in 81,255 treatment days of the trial. 1,134 coercive measures were administered in conjunction with aggressive behavior. In the preference arm the coercion rates fell from1.432 (95% CI 1.160 - 1.749) to 0.552 (95% CI 0.402 - 0.788) per 100 treatment days. A significant drop in coercion rates per 1000 treatment days were recorded on the wards having introduced the training course (pre test 23.81, 95% CI = 20.98 - 26.93 versus 17.699, 95% CI = 14.908 - 20.865 post test) and on the risk assessment preference wards test (15.811, 95% CI = 12.945 - 19.128 versus 6.265, 95% CI = 4.515 - 8.468). The main reasons for seclusion were the reduction of stimuli (498), treatment refusal (474), danger to others (460), and aggressive behavior (306). Conclusion A systematic risk assessment (preference arm) and a training course in aggression management are effective in reducing seclusion in psychiatric acute admission wards. The other two interventions (a systematic risk assessment alone and in combination with a training course) have no influence on seclusion rates. The preference arm wards faired well on the reduction of all coercive measures and seclusion. This finding may point to the possible role of motivation as a key factor in the reduction of coercion.
ACCESSION #
35704307

 

Related Articles

  • Statin Effects on Aggression: Results from the UCSD Statin Study, a Randomized Control Trial. Golomb, Beatrice A.; Dimsdale, Joel E.; Koslik, Hayley J.; Evans, Marcella A.; Lu, Xun; Rossi, Steven; Mills, Paul J.; White, Halbert L.; Criqui, Michael H. // PLoS ONE;7/1/2015, Vol. 10 Issue 7, p1 

    Background: Low/ered cholesterol is linked to aggression in some study designs. Cases/series have reported reproducible aggression increases on statins, but statins also bear mechanisms that could reduce aggression. Usual statin effects on aggression have not been characterized. Methods: 1016...

  • Participants' perceptions of motivation, randomisation and withdrawal in a randomised controlled trial of interventions for prevention of depression. Grant, J. Busby; Mackinnon, A. J.; Christensen, H.; Walker, J. // Journal of Medical Ethics;Dec2009, Vol. 35 Issue 12, p12 

    Aims and background: Little is known about how participants perceive prevention trials, particularly trials designed to prevent mental illness. This study examined participants' motives for participating in a trial and their views of randomisation and the ability to withdraw from a randomised...

  • SWOT Analysis of Contemporary Microfinance Impact Assessment Approaches. Khan, Zahoor; Bahari, Zakaria; Mahnaz Hassan, Syeda // Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences (PJSS);2014, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p485 

    Assessing the impact of microfinance programs is becoming popular among the microfinance practitioners and donors around the world. Appropriate assessment of microfinance programs enables major stakeholders to understand the current scenario and adapt better policy measures in the future. The...

  • Need for proactive approach to risk analysis in phase I trials. Van den Bogert, Cornelis A.; Cohen, Adam F. // BMJ: British Medical Journal;7/25/2015, Vol. 351 Issue 8018, ph3899 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "Quantifying the Risks of Non-Oncology Phase I Research in Healthy Volunteers: Meta-Analysis of Phase I Studies" by E. J. Emanuel, G. Bedarida, and K. Macci et al. in the June 26, 2015 issue.

  • Scientific evaluation of modern clinical research: we need a new currency! Büchler, Markus; Diener, Markus; Weitz, Jürgen // Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery;Oct2011, Vol. 396 Issue 7, p937 

    The article offers information on modern clinical research or clinical trials. It states that the approval of new medicinal products requires phase 3 randomized controlled trials, and nonpharmacological therapies and diagnostic procedures should be subjected to needs assessments and risk...

  • Randomized Controlled Trials in Environmental Health Research: Unethical or Underutilized? Allen, Ryan W.; Barn, Prabjit K.; Lanphear, Bruce P. // PLoS Medicine;Jan2015, Vol. 12 Issue 1, p1 

    Ryan Allen and colleagues argue that more randomized controlled trials in environmental health would complement a strong tradition of observational research. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary

  • Review: evidence on the effect of antiepileptics on recurrent aggression inconclusive.  // Evidence Based Mental Health;Aug2010, Vol. 13 Issue 3, p86 

    No abstract available.

  • Group-based cognitive-behavioural anger management for people with mild to moderate intellectual disabilities: cluster randomised controlled trial. Willner, Paul; Rose, John; Jahoda, Andrew; Stenfert Kroese, Biza; Felce, David; Cohen, David; MacMahon, Pamela; Stimpson, Aimee; Rose, Nicola; Gillespie, David; Shead, Jennifer; Lammie, Claire; Woodgate, Christopher; Townson, Julia; Nuttall, Jacqueline; Hood, Kerenza; Kroese, Biza Stenfert // British Journal of Psychiatry;Oct2013, Vol. 203 Issue 4, p288 

    Background: Many people with intellectual disabilities find it hard to control their anger and this often leads to aggression which can have serious consequences, such as exclusion from mainstream services and the need for potentially more expensive emergency placements.Aims:...

  • GIRLSS: A Randomized, Pilot Study of a Multisystemic, School-Based Intervention to Reduce Relational Aggression. Splett, Joni; Maras, Melissa; Brooks, Connie // Journal of Child & Family Studies;Aug2015, Vol. 24 Issue 8, p2250 

    We tested the effects of a school-based, multisystemic intervention to reduce relational aggression among adolescent girls, Growing Interpersonal Relationships through Learning and Systemic Supports (GIRLSS). GIRLSS is a 10-week, group counseling, caregiver training, and caregiver phone...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics