Implications of outpatient commitment and perceived coercion for stigma, quality of life and social functioning

Link, Bruce
January 2007
BMC Psychiatry;2007 Supplement 1, Vol. 7, Special section p1
Academic Journal
Background Policies and practices which deal with people who deviate from norms have relevance to the production of stigma -- they can induce, minimize or block it. We address stigma consequences of the use of coercion in mental health. Methods We empirically examine two perspectives on need for and consequences of coercion in the context of outpatient commitment. The "Mandated Treatment Engagement Hypothesis" tests whether treatment engagement when coerced aides in symptom reduction and leads to improvements in perceived stigma and its consequences. In this hypothesis symptoms drive consequences. The "Coercion to Stigma Hypothesis" examines whether coercion has negative effects on stigmatization, quality of life, social functioning, disengagement from treatment and symptoms. In this hypothesis, coercion drives consequences. We use longitudinal data on 184 people with severe mental illnesses. Results We find support for both hypotheses but for only some and different outcomes. "Mandated Treatment Engagement Hypothesis" is supported by findings indicating that psychotic symptoms affect illness-related social functioning and outpatient commitment is associated with better functioning. But psychotic symptoms are not significantly related to either stigma or quality of life. "Coercion to Stigma Hypothesis" is supported by results indicating that feeling coerced induces subsequent stigma and compromises quality of life. But feeling coerced has no bearing on symptoms or illness related social functioning and assignment to outpatient commitment does not appear to have negative effects and may have some positive ones. Conclusion These analyses speak to the role of policy in inducing stigma and understanding the sources of stigma in efforts to exert social control.


Related Articles


    Labeling theory proponents and the theory's critics have different views of stigma and thus differ on the consequences of labeling for people with mental illness. The labeling perspective posits that because of stigma, official labeling through treatment contact has negative consequences for...

  • Mass social contact interventions and their effect on mental health related stigma and intended discrimination.  // BMC Public Health;2012, Vol. 12 Issue 1, p489 

    The article discusses a study which examines the impact of social contact intervention among people with or without mental health problems in England. It details the study design that investigates the facilitating factors and interventions to reduce the stigma and discrimination of people with...

  • Public Stigma against People with Mental Illness in the Gilgel Gibe Field Research Center (GGFRC) in Southwest Ethiopia. Girma, Eshetu; Tesfaye, Markos; Froeschl, Guenter; Möller-Leimkühler, Anne Maria; Müller, Norbert; Dehning, Sandra // PLoS ONE;Dec2013, Vol. 8 Issue 12, p1 

    Background: Public understanding about mental illnesses and attitudes towards people with mental illness (PWMI) play a paramount role in the prevention and treatment of mental illness and the rehabilitation of PWMI. The aim of this study was to measure public stigma against PWMI and the factors...

  • in the know: erasing the stigma of mental illness.  // Plans & Trusts;Jan/Feb2020, Vol. 38 Issue 1, p42 

    No abstract available.

  • Perceptions of a South African schizophrenia population with regards to community attitudes towards their illness. Botha, Ulla A.; Koen, Liezl; Niehaus, Dana J. H. // Social Psychiatry & Psychiatric Epidemiology;Aug2006, Vol. 41 Issue 8, p619 

    Background: With the worldwide shift towards a more community-based psychiatric service delivery approach, stigma and the issues surrounding it have received much attention. However, very little South African data exist and the aim of our study was therefore to investigate the...

  • A gap approach to exploring quality of life in mental health. Welham, Joy; Haire, Mary; Mercer, Dianne; Stedman, Terry; Welham, J; Haire, M; Mercer, D; Stedman, T // Quality of Life Research;Aug2001, Vol. 10 Issue 5, p421 

    Improving quality of life (QoL) is an important treatment outcome for the serious mentally ill. There is, however, a need for an instrument which both captures consumers own assessments and gives direct information for intervention. A useful approach is to define QoL as the gap between actual...

  • MENTAL HEALTH. Montague, Jim; Pitman, Hilarie // H&HN: Hospitals & Health Networks;12/20/95, Vol. 69 Issue 24, p22 

    Cites a study published in the `Journal of the American Medical Association' on the quality of life of people with common mental disorders. Link between depressive disorders with impairment of quality of life; Need to focus on recognition and treatment of common mental disorders.

  • Chapter 1: What is advocacy and why is it important?  // Advocacy for Mental Health;1/1/2003, p9 

    Chapter 1 of the book "Advocacy for Mental Health" is presented. It discusses what advocacy is and why it is important. It describes what the barriers to mental health are and explains the effects of stigma on people with mental disorders. It notes the positive outcomes yielded by advocacy...

  • Integrating mental health and public health: A call to action. Degutis, Linda // Nation's Health;Feb2008, Vol. 38 Issue 1, p3 

    The author reflects on the integration of mental health into public health. It is not enough to accept mental health as part of human health. It is important to integrate mental health, both conceptually and practically, into public health. Communities and policy-makers should be educated and...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics