TITLE

Reduction in the use of seclusion in a high secure hospital in the UK: a retrospective analysis

AUTHOR(S)
Qurashi, Inti; Johnson, Desmond; Johnson, Ben
PUB. DATE
January 2007
SOURCE
BMC Psychiatry;2007 Supplement 1, Vol. 7, Special section p1
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Background The main aim of this retrospective analysis is to ascertain whether a comprehensive seclusion reduction program was successful in reducing the use of seclusion within a high secure hospital in the UK. Methods The evaluation was conducted in Ashworth Hospital, UK. For the purposes of this paper the following strategies were identified post-hoc and analyzed as the independent variables namely, progressively lowering the threshold for a multi-disciplinary group review, providing targeted staff training dependent on patient needs and increasing the clinical staff-patient ratio. A multiple regression analysis was applied to monthly seclusion data covering the period from January 2002 - January 2006. As the total hospital census declined during the four-year period the monthly data for total hours of seclusion over the period divided by the inpatient census for that month served as the dependent variable. Results A graphical analysis reveals there has been a 62% reduction in the number of seclusion episodes over the 4 year period. Results from the multiple regression analysis showed that the reduction in the threshold for an internal clinical review had a statistically significant effect (p < 0.05). There were no statistically significant results from the other variables included in the regression analyses although this should not be equated with an absence of clinical significance. Conclusion Our retrospective review confirms that reduction in the use of seclusion can be achieved when it is identified as both a managerial and clinical priority, supplemented by robust performance monitoring and effective peer reviews and case management. The formation of a hospital committee populated by senior clinical managers with the progressive lowering of thresholds to precipitate a formal peer review served as a clear reminder of this priority to all clinical staff. Further analysis of the data, including other variables, are intended to be published.
ACCESSION #
35704290

 

Related Articles

  • Impact of the physical environment of psychiatric wards on the use of seclusion. van der Schaaf, P. S.; Dusseldorp, E.; Keuning, F. M.; Janssen, W. A.; Noorthoorn, E. O. // British Journal of Psychiatry;Feb2013, Vol. 202 Issue 2, p142 

    Background: The physical environment is presumed to have an effect on aggression and also on the use of seclusion on psychiatric wards. Multicentre studies that include a broad variety of design features found on psychiatric wards and that control for patient, staff and general ward...

  • Seclusion. Angold, Adrian; Angold, A // British Journal of Psychiatry;Apr89, Vol. 154, p437 

    Seclusion is a commonly used management technique in some areas of psychiatric practice. However, its theoretical and empirical underpinnings are greatly wanting in many respects. This paper reviews the present state of our knowledge and ignorance about seclusion, and suggests some strategies...

  • Locking up patients with psychiatric illness. Wilkinson, Greg // British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Edition);2/19/1983, Vol. 286 Issue 6365, p581 

    Investigates the nature of secluding patients with psychiatric illness in Great Britain. Inadequacy of the guidelines set by the Department of Health and Social Security on the management of violent patients; Role of doctors in dealing with seclusion abuses; Need of hospitals to have strict...

  • CORRESPONDENCE. Jarvis, M.J.; Russell, M.A.H.; Hughes, J.A.; Hutchison, D.C.S.; Fountain, William; Shepherd, Mary P.; Townsend, E.R.; Moghissi, K.; Williams, J. Aled; MacDonald, Anne; Rees, Philip; Hart, William A.; Rawlins, M.D.; Tallett, E.R.; Jones, D.B.; Mann, J.I.; Mikhailidis, D.P.; Jeremy, J.Y. // British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Edition);3/19/1983, Vol. 286 Issue 6369, p976 

    Presents several letters on medicine in Great Britain. Smoking withdrawal of patients with smoking related diseases; Difficulty of treating oesophageal carcinoma by resection; Necessity for seclusion in the caring professions. INSET: Points.

  • Attitudes to seclusion in Virginia. Mann, Lee S.; Wise, Thomas N.; Mann, L S; Wise, T N // British Journal of Psychiatry;Aug89, Vol. 155, p263 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to an article about psychiatric patients' reaction toward seclusion in the April 1989 issue.

  • The selection of experts evaluating health projects for the EU Sixth Framework Program. Quaglio, GianLuca; Guardabasso, Vincenzo; Olesen, Ole; Draghia-Akli, Ruxandra // Journal of Public Health (09431853);Oct2011, Vol. 19 Issue 5, p445 

    Aim: The Framework Programmes for Research and Technological Development (FP) are the European Union's funding programmes for research in Europe. The study analyses the features of external experts involved in evaluating the research proposals in FP6 (years 2003-2006) in the area of Life...

  • Regulatory bill lets peers decide.  // Ophthalmology Times;3/13/95, Vol. 20 Issue 11, p24 

    Reports on legislative provisions in the United States that would provide for peer review panels that could include individuals with a financial stake in the decisions. Risk assessments to be conducted by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before issuing any new regulation; Cost-benefit...

  • The check-up. Henderson, Perry M. // Outlook;Summer96, Vol. 64 Issue 2, p33 

    Presents a scenario depicting a peer review between certified public accountants. Suggestions for a good review. INSET: Updated peer review standards..

  • Avoiding Peer Review findings. Part 2. Hoover, Delano C.; Roberts, Glenn A. // Ohio CPA Journal;Feb96, Vol. 55 Issue 1, p42 

    Part II. Discusses several problems encountered during on-site peer reviews. Audit deficiencies; Non-compliance to continuing education policies; Inadequate reference library.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics