Post-incident treatment following coercive measures: a Delphi study

Grywa, Diana; Needham, Ian
January 2007
BMC Psychiatry;2007 Supplement 1, Vol. 7, Special section p1
Academic Journal
Background Coercive measures may traumatize patients and may disturb their relationship to carers. To maintain a good therapeutic relationship and to help avoid future coercion carers should address the aftermath of coercion with the patients involved. Much variation exists regarding post-incident treatment and Swiss data show that only about 30% of patients receive such treatment. Thus, the study objective was to ascertain the possible content of post-incident treatment. Methods A Delphi study including 28 psychiatric professionals (nurses, psychologists, psychiatrists) was conducted. The major themes presented in the first round were: terminology, objectives, timing, content, necessity, contra-indications and exemption, carer responsibility, atmospheric aspects, recording, and general remarks. Results 22 (79%) of the surveyed institutions have no guidelines regarding post-incident treatment and in the hospitals with guidelines only 3 (50%) use them systematically. After three Delphi rounds a positive consensus was established on the following themes: Professionals view post-incident treatment as supportive and helpful in helping to cope with trauma, to promote the patient-carer relationship, and to help prevent future coercion. Trying to convince patients of the justification of the coercive measures or using the post-incident treatment to debrief personnel were consensually rejected. No consensus was established e.g. on the "right" time or the frequency for the post-incident treatment or on regarding possible re-traumatisation of patients as a contraindication for post-incident treatment. Conclusion Post-incident treatment is generally viewed as helpful although some details are difficult to regulate (timing, possible re-traumatisation). Minimal standards/guidelines could possibly motivate carers to increase the number of post-incident treatment. However, the expert opinion established on post-incident treatment must be subjected to empirical testing.


Related Articles

  • From Rogers to Rivers: The Rights of the Mentally Ill to Refuse Medication. Clayton, Ellen Wright // American Journal of Law & Medicine;1987, Vol. 13 Issue 1, p7 

    Many individuals with mental illness wish to avoid psychotropic drugs, a type of treatment that may relieve their symptoms only at the risk of unpleasant, even permanent, side effects. In marked contrast to the widely-held view that most patients may refuse any treatment and that even patients...

  • Techniques Used by Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) Teams to Encourage Adherence: Patient and Staff Perceptions. Appelbaum, Paul S.; Le Melle, Stephanie // Community Mental Health Journal;Dec2008, Vol. 44 Issue 6, p459 

    Assertive community treatment (ACT) has become a cornerstone of care for people with serious mental illnesses. But it has also been suggested that ACT is an inherently coercive approach, with a variety of techniques, including leverage, frequently employed to encourage treatment adherence. Staff...

  • Being There. Iarovici, Doris // O, The Oprah Magazine;Feb2016, p115 

    The article offers various suggestions to give social support to the person who is suffering from mental illness with polite steps to be taken including use of concerned and compassionate sentences, avoiding rousing statements and treating the person with care and helpful nature.

  • Therapist Concerns and Process Issues in Grapplingwith Functional Autobiographical Amnesia. Tripathi, Ravikesh; Bharath, Srikala; Desai, Geetha; Mehrotra, Seema // Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine;Jul-Sep2013, Vol. 35 Issue 3, p305 

    Dissociative amnesia is relatively rare form of the dissociative disorder. This paper aims at describing the salient features of a case of functional autobiographical amnesia in a young adult and the approach adopted in the psychological management of this case. The case highlights concerns of...

  • Treat the 1 Percent. FULLER TORREY, E. // National Review;1/28/2013, Vol. 65 Issue 1, p26 

    The article looks at treatment for people with severe mental illness in the U.S., as of 2013. The author reports that a very small fraction of the severely mentally ill are responsible for a disproportionate number of violent crimes, saying this is due to their going untreated. He presents a...

  • Coercive treatment and stigma: is there a link? Gaebel, Wolfgang // BMC Psychiatry;2007 Supplement 1, Vol. 7, Special section p1 

    Coercive treatment comprises compulsory admission of patients as well as coercive treatment measures. Both are sometimes inevitable elements of psychiatric care, with the aim to prevent danger from patients and other persons. The stigma of mental illness is still one of the most challenging...

  • Involuntary Outpatient Commitment, Community Treatment Orders, and Assisted Outpatient Treatment: What's in the Data? Swartz, Marvin S.; Swanson, Jeffrey W. // Canadian Journal of Psychiatry;Sep2004, Vol. 49 Issue 9, p585 

    Objective: Involuntary outpatient commitment (OPC), also referred to as community treatment orders or assisted outpatient treatment, is a legal intervention intended to improve treatment adherence among persons with serious mental illness. This paper reviews the empirical literature on the...

  • Joint Crisis Plans reduce coercive treatment. Henderson, Claire; Flood, Chris; Morven, Leese; Thornicroft, Graham; Sutherby, Kim; Szmukler, George // BMC Psychiatry;2007 Supplement 1, Vol. 7, Special section p1 

    Background To investigate whether a form of advance agreement for people with severe mental illness can reduce the use of inpatient services and compulsory admission. Methods Design: Single blind randomized controlled trial. Setting: Eight community mental health teams in southern England....

  • IT'S TIME TO END FORCED TREATMENT. Ashcraft, Lori; Anthony, William A. // Behavioral Healthcare;Dec2006, Vol. 26 Issue 12, p8 

    The article suggests the removal of the concept of efficiency reflected in the practice of forced or involuntary treatment in promoting the recovery of mentally ill patients. It infers that forced treatment interferes with a person's recovery and raises doubt in the person's ability to learn and...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics