TITLE

New research on psychiatric advance directives

AUTHOR(S)
Swartz, Marvin; Swanson, Jeffrey; Elbogen, Eric
PUB. DATE
January 2007
SOURCE
BMC Psychiatry;2007 Supplement 1, Vol. 7, Special section p1
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Background Psychiatric advance directives (PADs) provide a legal means for competent individuals to refuse or consent to future mental health treatment during periods of decisional incapacity. Previous studies have shown high potential demand for PADs but low rates of completion in the United States, despite new laws authorizing PADs in over 20 states. This paper reports the results of the first randomized study of a structured, manualized intervention to facilitate completion of PADs. Methods A sample of 469 patients with severe mental illness were randomly assigned to a facilitated advance directive (FPAD) session or a control group receiving written information about PADs and a referral for assistance from existing resources in the public mental health system. Results Sixty-one percent of F-PAD participants completed legal advance instructions and/or authorized a proxy decision maker; 3% of control group participants completed these legal instruments. PAD instructional documents were rated by psychiatrist-raters to have highly consistent with standard standards of community practice. No participant used a PAD to refuse all treatment, though most participants refused some medications and expressed preferences for admission to specific hospitals and not others. At 1 month follow-up, F-PAD participants had significantly greater improvement in working alliance and were significantly more likely to report receiving the mental health services they believed they needed, compared to the control group. In addition other improvements were seen at 6 and 12 months in other clinical domains. Conclusion Structured facilitation of PADs may be a necessary service in order for PAD policies to be implemented and to achieve PADs' promise of providing greater self-determination and better-informed treatment decision making for persons with severe mental illness.
ACCESSION #
35704279

 

Related Articles

  • Live and Let Die: Establishing the Legal Status of Advance Directives for Refusal of Life-Sustaining Medical Treatment, Their Enforceability, and Limitations. Leido, Juan Paolo Miguel B. // Ateneo Law Journal;Sep2012, Vol. 57 Issue 2, p491 

    The article focuses on the aspects of the advance directives of a patient for the refusal life-sustaining health treatment. It mentions that the ability of the patient to decide on his preferences to end-of-life care or right to self-determination is within the relationship between physician and...

  • Hillsborough part 2: advance decisions and futile treatment. Griffith, Richard // British Journal of Nursing;2014, Vol. 23 Issue 12, p672 

    In the second article on the impact of the Hillsborough football stadium disaster on healthcare law, Richard Griffith discusses the case of Tony Bland, who suffered prolonged hypoxia due to the crushing crowd surge, leaving him in a persistent vegetative state. Some 3 years after the incident,...

  • Embedding the Mental Capacity Act into clinical practice in England and Wales. Regnard, Claud; Louw, Stephen // Age & Ageing;Jul2011, Vol. 40 Issue 4, p416 

    The authors discuss the integration of the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) in clinical practice in England and Wales. The authors cite the survey conducted by C. J. Bond and K. Lowton regarding geriatricians' views on patients with an advance decision to refuse treatments (ADRTs). Furthermore, the...

  • Consent and assessment of capacity to decide or refuse treatment. Simpson, Owena // British Journal of Nursing;4/27/2011, Vol. 20 Issue 8, p510 

    Consent protects the right of patients to decide what happens to them. Before any medical intervention, adults must give valid consent, which must be voluntary, informed and given free of undue influence. When consent is being obtained, patients must be informed about the intervention, why it is...

  • LE REFUS DE SOINS PSYCHIATRIQUES EST-IL POSSIBLE AU QUÉBEC ? DISCUSSION À LA LUMIÈRE DU CAS DE L'AUTORISATION DE SOINS. Bernheim, Emmanuelle // McGill Law Journal;Mar2012, Vol. 57 Issue 3, p553 

    Personal inviolability is a fundamental principle in Quebec law, which is notably being updated to include the right to refuse treatment. Even when a person does not have the capacity to consent to care, personal autonomy must be taken into account, and at best observed. The law thus reflects...

  • Cognition and consent for adults. Thompson, James // British Journal of Neuroscience Nursing;Aug2012, Vol. 8 Issue 4, p202 

    The article discusses several court cases to highlight the profoundness and necessity of providing rights of autonomy and self-determination in health care. It elaborates on the guidelines issued by the General Medical Council (GMC) and the British Medical Association (BMA), which recommends...

  • Consent and capacity 2: the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and 'living wills.'. Fullbrook, Suzanne; Sanders, Karen // British Journal of Nursing;4/26/2007, Vol. 16 Issue 8, p474 

    The last article in this series discussed the social concerns which influenced the decision to introduce a law that layed out certain rights for certain people, with respect to healthcare choices, responsibilities and decisions. This, and the next article drawn attention to a specific aspect of...

  • Guardian's Ability to Make End-of-Life Decisions in Health Care, Part II: The National Landscape. Bailly, Rose Mary // Victimization of the Elderly & Disabled;Jul/Aug2011, Vol. 14 Issue 2, p17 

    The article offers an overview of public policy regarding the ability of a guarding to make decisions at the end of life across the U.S. In March 2010, the Family Health Care Decision-Making Act was adopted in New York to allow a third party to make end-of-life decisions without the appointment...

  • Consent: a legal process. STARR, LINDA // Australian Nursing Journal;Dec2011/Jan2012, Vol. 19 Issue 6, p29 

    The article presents a discussion of the factors that are involved with obtaining a lawful consent from a medical patient. A discussion of the differences that are found between a voluntary consent, specific consent and informed consent is presented. The role that the concept of legal capacity...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics