TITLE

Mental health courts -- a human rights perspective

AUTHOR(S)
Kerr, Grace
PUB. DATE
January 2007
SOURCE
BMC Psychiatry;2007 Supplement 1, Vol. 7, Special section p1
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
This presentation analyzes specialised mental health courts (MHCs), as one solution to the long-standing, growing challenge of dealing fairly and justly with persons with mental illness (PMIs) coming before the criminal justice system, from a human rights (HR) perspective. MHCs have garnered professional and political support in North America. Redefining their primary purpose from the determination of fault and the imposition of punishment to the provision of treatment and the enhancement of well-being, to date little consideration has been given to whether the costs of MHCs in terms of de-individualised justice are worth their benefits. As Harris points out, 'sometimes wise policies and practices can have unintended side effects'. And as Thomas Jefferson reminds us, 'the price of liberty is eternal vigilance'. Thus, addressing the HR implications of MHCs should rank highly on its advocates' agendas. Potential HR concerns, arising from MHCs and relating to PMIs essential dignity rights as well as their rights to non-degrading treatment, autonomy, privacy, due process and non-discrimination, will be assessed. Like other writers, the presenter urges that only through respecting PMIs' rights to services and fulfilling society's duty to provide same, and not through MHCs, will PMIs be afforded the full rights that democratic states ought to provide their citizens. The manner in which MDOs are managed (or not) by the multiple services and systems they typically encounter creates a broad measure of dissatisfaction that goes beyond any single jurisdiction or country. Moreover, the sufficient issue overlaps and fundamental commonalities in approaches to the problems faced by MDOs provide a general societal and judicial context for an analysis of MHCs and a related HR discussion, notwithstanding the presenter references the provisions of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) (1950) for her HR analysis.
ACCESSION #
35704268

 

Related Articles

  • A Phone Call to Putin. Nemtsova, Anna // Newsweek (Pacific Edition);3/13/2006 (Pacific Edition), Vol. 147 Issue 11, p27 

    The article looks at the Russian Army's "special operations." Since 1998, the European Court of Human Rights has received more than 28,000 human-rights complaints from Russia, most concerning abuse of power by police and judicial corruption, which is more than any other country in the Council of...

  • British parents consider whether to spare the rod. Andreae, Christopher // Christian Science Monitor;9/30/98, Vol. 90 Issue 215, pB3 

    Describes the debate about corporal punishment by parents in Great Britain. Changing attitudes about physical punishment; British law allowing chastisement; September, 1998 ruling by the European Court of Human Rights that a boy's rights were violated by his father; Views of Health Minister...

  • The Death Penalty. van den Haag, Ernest; Schwarzschild, Henry // ABA Journal;Apr85, Vol. 71 Issue 4, p38 

    Features views opposing or supporting death penalty in the United States. Constitutional provisions consistent with death penalty; State's arrogation of God-like wisdom to decide who should live and who should die; Deterrent effect of death penalty; Argument of social utility; Exemplary effect...

  • Punitive and preventive justice in an era of profiling, smart prediction and practical preclusion: three key questions. Brownsword, Roger; Beyleveld, Deryck // International Journal of Law in Context;Jun2019, Vol. 15 Issue 2, p198 

    In the context of a technology-driven algorithmic approach to criminal justice, this paper responds to the following three questions: (1) what reasons are there for treating liberal values and human rights as guiding for punitive justice; (2) is preventive justice comparable to punitive justice...

  • Punitive and preventive justice in an era of profiling, smart prediction and practical preclusion: three key questions. Brownsword, Roger; Beyleveld, Deryck // International Journal of Law in Context;Jun2019, Vol. 15 Issue 2, p198 

    In the context of a technology-driven algorithmic approach to criminal justice, this paper responds to the following three questions: (1) what reasons are there for treating liberal values and human rights as guiding for punitive justice; (2) is preventive justice comparable to punitive justice...

  • Better Than Ever.  // Transitions Online;4/22/2003, pN.PAG 

    Focuses on the international diplomatic and political relationship between Serbia and Montenegro. Violation in human rights based on ethnicity in Montenegro; Argument of the European Union against the independence of Montenegro; Overview of the defense reforms between Serbia and Montenegro.

  • Serbia and Montenegro: Closer Than Ever.  // Transitions Online;4/22/2003, pN.PAG 

    Focuses on the international diplomatic and political relationship between Serbia and Montenegro. Violation in human rights based on ethnicity in Montenegro; Argument of the European Union against the independence of Montenegro; Overview of the defense reforms between Serbia and Montenegro.

  • Human Rights, Cyprus Issues Loom Over Turkey's EU Aspirations. Gorvett, Jon // Washington Report on Middle East Affairs;Jan/Feb2002, Vol. 21 Issue 1, p28 

    Focuses on the membership of Turkey to the European Union. Participation in State Security Courts; Condemnation of serious human rights abuses; Limitation of rights.

  • The European Union.  // Hill;12/10/2012, Vol. 19 Issue 137, p13 

    The article focuses on the role of European Union in promoting Peace, democracy, and human rights in Europe and also lists its achievements.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics