Outcome of patients hospitalized by public authorities in a public mental health sector

Cornic, Françoise; Beghelli, Fabien; Vacheron, Marie-Noëlle
January 2007
BMC Psychiatry;2007 Supplement 1, Vol. 7, Special section p1
Academic Journal
Background In France, the laws of 27 June 1990 modified by the law of 4 March 2002 define the scope and procedures of involuntary hospitalizations. Regarding hospitalization by the public authorities the laws state that there must be a threat to the safety of individuals or a serious threat to public order. This procedure is applied since 1838, yet its practice and usefulness have never been assessed. This study seeks to assess current medical practice for applying this procedure and the outcome of the subjects hospitalized under this procedure. Methods A retrospective analysis of clinical data during and after the hospitalization was conducted on 145 subjects hospitalized by the public authorities between 1996 and 2006 in a public mental health sector, in Saint Anna Hospital, Paris, France. Results 90% of the hospitalization by the public authorities were motivated by an acting out or a high risk of acting out. A majority of patients shared classical characteristics of difficult patients in psychiatric care: men (74%), socially isolated, with a long psychiatric history (77.8%), drug addicts (50%). 25.5% of the patients had a history of violence and 15% of them a forensic history. Schizophrenia was the most frequent diagnosis (73%) according to DSM-IVR criteria. The average hospitalization duration was 2.4 months (2 days to 60 months). After discharge from full-time hospitalization, enforcement of care was maintained using trial discharge for 51% of the patients. 9.8% of the patients were lost to follow-up. During follow-up, 31.4% were re-hospitalized, only 8% of them were initially managed in a forensic emergency ward. Conclusion Current medical practice respects hospitalization under the legal frame defined for public authorities. This legal procedure is an efficient tool for psychiatrists. Trial discharge facilitates continuity in psychiatric care and prevents efficiently acting out in difficult patients.


Related Articles

  • Evaluation of the UK dangerous and severe personality disorder (DSPD) program. Burns, Tom; Sinclair, Julia; Yiend, Jenny // BMC Psychiatry;2007 Supplement 1, Vol. 7, Special section p1 

    Background The UK government has established four new specialist secure units to pilot a dedicated service aimed to reduce the risk to the public of those deemed to have DSPD. This study aims to describe the characteristics of the patients/prisoners admitted to these pilot sites, their pathway...

  • Discharge delays down to chance? McMillan, Katharine // Mental Health Practice;Nov2013, Vol. 17 Issue 3, p10 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to Matthew Impey and Erik Milner's article comparing discharge delay in inpatient care between 2001 and 2011 published in the September 2013 issue.

  • Awareness raised about legal duty to children of detained parents.  // Mental Health Practice;Apr2013, Vol. 16 Issue 7, p4 

    The article reports that the Mental Welfare Commission (MWC) of Scotland suggests raising awareness regarding the legal duty towards children of detained parents to consider the impact of compulsory admission to hospital of parents on their children.

  • Outcome assessment of the VADO approach in psychiatric rehabilitation: a partially randomised multicentric trial. Pioli, Rosaria; Vittorielli, Michela; Gigantesco, Antonella; Rossi, Giuseppe; Basso, Luigi; Caprioli, Chiara; Buizza, Chiara; Corradi, Angela; Mirabella, Fiorino; Morosini, Pierluigi; Falloon, Ian R. H. // Clinical Practice & Epidemiology in Mental Health;2006, Vol. 2, p5 

    Background: Recent studies on representative samples of psychiatric services have shown that low proportions of cases received effective rehabilitation interventions. The following are likely to be the most important causes: the scarcity of mental health workers trained in social and work skills...

  • Psychiatrist Characteristics Related to Patient Outcome in Japan. Abe, Takeru; Moriya, Megumi; Ikeda, Koji; Kuroda, Kenji; Hagihara, Akihito // Psychiatric Quarterly;Jun2012, Vol. 83 Issue 2, p221 

    We evaluated psychiatric care in terms of the relationship between patient outcome (length of stay, Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) at discharge, GAF difference, and GAF change per day) and psychiatrist characteristics (gender and years in psychiatric practice) in patients with...

  • Routine outcome measures.  // Therapy Today;Jul2014, Vol. 25 Issue 6, p56 

    The article offers information on the British Association for Counselling and Psychotherapy (BACP) Research department's new web page on routine outcome measures, which offers practical information about how and why to use them, and the different measures available.

  • Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale 32. Jerrell, Jeanette M. // Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research;Jul-Sep2005, Vol. 32 Issue 3, p341 

    To be useful in assessing treatment efficacy, an outcome measure must be sensitive to changes in ratings of symptoms and psychosocial functioning over time and to differences in change across consumers and be interpretable as to the extent of clinical improvement. Results are presented regarding...

  • Integrated care improves one year outcomes in first episode psychosis. Petersen, L.; Nordentoft, M.; Jeppesen, P. // Evidence Based Mental Health;May2006, Vol. 9 Issue 2, p46 

    The article discusses the potential of a community based, integrated treatment plan in reducing poor clinical and social result in people with first episode psychosis in Denmark. A study was conducted with 547 adults in the mental health services and the community in Copenhagen and Aarhus. They...

  • Understanding how people who use illicit drugs and alcohol experience relationships with psychiatric inpatient staff. Chorlton, Emma; Smith, Ian; Jones, Sarah // Social Psychiatry & Psychiatric Epidemiology;Jan2015, Vol. 50 Issue 1, p51 

    Purpose: Psychiatric inpatient services are often required to provide care for people with mental health difficulties who use illicit drugs or alcohol (people with coexisting difficulties). In other settings, relationships between service users and staff can be important in alleviating distress...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics