TITLE

Staff members' attitudes towards coercive measures

AUTHOR(S)
Bergk, Jan; Steinert, Tilman
PUB. DATE
January 2007
SOURCE
BMC Psychiatry;2007 Supplement 1, Vol. 7, Special section p1
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Background Coercive measures are associated with high strain for staff members. Most commonly used are mechanical restraint and seclusion. Both interventions are relatively secure and are considered as helpful in prevention of serious harm to self or others when other means are ineffective. Methods Interviews with staff members were conducted focusing on a coercive measure they had carried out shortly before. The half-structured interview questioned how severely the patient's human rights were restricted during the coercive measure. We measured the restriction of human rights by a scale developed for this purpose, Human DIgnity during COercive Procedures, DICOP. It consists of the aspects human dignity, ability to move, autonomy, coercion applied at the beginning of the measure, and restriction of contact. In addition staff members estimated the restriction of human rights by seclusion and mechanical restraint in general. Interviews of 39 staff members referring to 94 coercive measures were obtained. Results In general seclusion is estimated as the measure with lower impact on the restrictions of human rights and is largely preferred by staff members. In the assessments of concrete coercive measures which had been carried out shortly before mechanical restraint was rated as the much more restricting measure concerning human rights. Though staff members preferred seclusion in general, they considered the measure carried out shortly before as the adequate one even if it was mechanical restraint. Conclusion From the staff members' point of view seclusion seems to be less restrictive, but there are obviously attitudes to prefer mechanical restraint in specific situations. Indications for mechanical restraint might be severe psychomotoric agitation, requirement of monitoring continuously or in short intervals, and preference expressed by the patient. Further research should focus on differential indications between different kinds of coercive measures.
ACCESSION #
35704255

 

Related Articles

  • The development of a scale to measure staff attitude to coercion. Husum, Tonje Lossius; Ruud, Torleif // BMC Psychiatry;2007 Supplement 1, Vol. 7, Special section p1 

    Previous studies have shown that there is considerable variation in the degree to which coercion is used in mental health institutions. This variation between institutions and even between wards is seen in many countries. Many factors have been put foreword to explain this variation in the use...

  • Staff attitudes and thoughts about the use of coercion in acute psychiatric wards. Husum, Tonje; Bjørngaard, Johan; Finset, Arnstein; Ruud, Torleif // Social Psychiatry & Psychiatric Epidemiology;Sep2011, Vol. 46 Issue 9, p893 

    Purpose: Previous research has shown considerable differences in how often coercive measures are used in mental health care between groups of patients, institutions and geographical areas. Staff attitudes towards the use of coercion have been put forward as a factor that may influence these...

  • Born to be free: the influence of raising the awareness of the nursing staff to the reduction of the use of physical restraints on restraint orders, hours of restraint and the numbers of patients restrained -- a retrospective study. Dahan, Sagit; Levi, Galit; Behrbalk, Pnina; Melamed, Yuval; Bleich, Avi // BMC Psychiatry;2007 Supplement 1, Vol. 7, Special section p1 

    Background Restraint of psychiatric patients is an ethical issue, emphasized by awareness of the rights of mentally ill individuals. Restraint significantly influences the emotional welfare of the patient, is traumatic, deprives the individual of freedom and has aggressive connotations. Aims: To...

  • Survey highlights lack of uniformity in C&R training.  // Mental Health Practice;Mar2004, Vol. 7 Issue 6, p5 

    Reports on the survey of mental health care professionals in Great Britain focusing on the use of control and restraint. Lack of uniformity in training of mental health professionals on the use of control and restraint; Need for a randomized control trial.

  • The Ethics of Ambivalence and the Practice of Constraint in US Psychiatry. Brodwin, Paul // Culture, Medicine & Psychiatry;Dec2014, Vol. 38 Issue 4, p527 

    This article investigates the ambivalence of front-line mental health clinicians toward their power to impose treatment against people's will. Ambivalence denotes both inward uncertainty and a collective process that emerges in the midst of everyday work. In their commentaries about ambivalence,...

  • Use of coercive measures in a psychiatric sub-acute unit. 6-month review. Moreiras, N.; Roda, S.; Ribas, Joan S.; Vicens, E.; Torres, M.; Moyano, R.; Artero, Carmen M. // BMC Psychiatry;2007 Supplement 1, Vol. 7, Special section p1 

    Background In our psychiatric hospital we have a guideline in order to regulate the use of coercitive measures (isolation in specials rooms and use of safety straps). These measures are the last kind of intervention we use. The guideline defines us the procedure for using the different measures,...

  • Definition and use of coercive measures in old age psychiatry settings in Germany and Wales. Kronstorfer, Rita // BMC Psychiatry;2007 Supplement 1, Vol. 7, Special section p1 

    Background Patients with organic mental disorders (ICD 10 F0) are a high risk group in regard to being subject to coercive measures. Methods used in old age psychiatry tend to vary widely among European countries. Legal background, ethical considerations, staffing levels and techniques available...

  • A comparison between seven Swiss and seven German hospitals concerning the use of coercive measures. Bernhardsgrütter, Renate // BMC Psychiatry;2007 Supplement 1, Vol. 7, Special section p1 

    Background In 2004, two independent working groups in Germany and Switzerland compared the frequency and duration of coercive measures in standard psychiatric care across 14 psychiatric hospitals in Germany and Switzerland. The objective was to establish an international knowledge transfer...

  • Legislation and practice of coercive measures during in-patient treatment in 12 European countries: results of a case vignette study. Steinert, Tilman; Lepping, Peter; Needham, Ian // BMC Psychiatry;2007 Supplement 1, Vol. 7, Special section p1 

    Background Patients who exhibit violent behavior or refuse medication during in-patient treatment are a challenge for clinical management. The management of those clinical situations is different in European countries with respect to legislation and clinical routine. Methods We selected three...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics