TITLE

The unfoldomics decade: an update on intrinsically disordered proteins

AUTHOR(S)
Dunker, A. Keith; Oldfield, Christopher J.; Jingwei Meng; Romero, Pedro; Yang, Jack Y.; Chen, Jessica Walton; Vacic, Vladimir; Obradovic, Zoran; Uversky, Vladimir N.
PUB. DATE
January 2008
SOURCE
BMC Genomics;2008 Supplement 2, Vol. 9, Special section p1
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Background: Our first predictor of protein disorder was published just over a decade ago in the Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks (Romero P, Obradovic Z, Kissinger C, Villafranca JE, Dunker AK (1997) Identifying disordered regions in proteins from amino acid sequence. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, 1: 90-95). By now more than twenty other laboratory groups have joined the efforts to improve the prediction of protein disorder. While the various prediction methodologies used for protein intrinsic disorder resemble those methodologies used for secondary structure prediction, the two types of structures are entirely different. For example, the two structural classes have very different dynamic properties, with the irregular secondary structure class being much less mobile than the disorder class. The prediction of secondary structure has been useful. On the other hand, the prediction of intrinsic disorder has been revolutionary, leading to major modifications of the more than 100 year-old views relating protein structure and function. Experimentalists have been providing evidence over many decades that some proteins lack fixed structure or are disordered (or unfolded) under physiological conditions. In addition, experimentalists are also showing that, for many proteins, their functions depend on the unstructured rather than structured state; such results are in marked contrast to the greater than hundred year old views such as the lock and key hypothesis. Despite extensive data on many important examples, including disease-associated proteins, the importance of disorder for protein function has been largely ignored. Indeed, to our knowledge, current biochemistry books don't present even one acknowledged example of a disorder-dependent function, even though some reports of disorder-dependent functions are more than 50 years old. The results from genome-wide predictions of intrinsic disorder and the results from other bioinformatics studies of intrinsic disorder are demanding attention for these proteins. Results: Disorder prediction has been important for showing that the relatively few experimentally characterized examples are members of a very large collection of related disordered proteins that are wide-spread over all three domains of life. Many significant biological functions are now known to depend directly on, or are importantly associated with, the unfolded or partially folded state. Here our goal is to review the key discoveries and to weave these discoveries together to support novel approaches for understanding sequence-function relationships. Conclusion: Intrinsically disordered protein is common across the three domains of life, but especially common among the eukaryotic proteomes. Signaling sequences and sites of posttranslational modifications are frequently, or very likely most often, located within regions of intrinsic disorder. Disorder-to-order transitions are coupled with the adoption of different structures with different partners. Also, the flexibility of intrinsic disorder helps different disordered regions to bind to a common binding site on a common partner. Such capacity for binding diversity plays important roles in both protein-protein interaction networks and likely also in gene regulation networks. Such disorder-based signaling is further modulated in multicellular eukaryotes by alternative splicing, for which such splicing events map to regions of disorder much more often than to regions of structure. Associating alternative splicing with disorder rather than structure alleviates theoretical and experimentally observed problems associated with the folding of different length, isomeric amino acid sequences.…
ACCESSION #
35701843

 

Related Articles

  • Defining the geometry of the two-component proteasome degron. Inobe, Tomonao; Fishbain, Susan; Prakash, Sumit; Matouschek, Andreas // Nature Chemical Biology;Mar2011, Vol. 7 Issue 3, p161 

    The eukaryotic 26S proteasome controls cellular processes by degrading specific regulatory proteins. Most proteins are targeted for degradation by a signal or degron that consists of two parts: a proteasome-binding tag, typically covalently attached polyubiquitin chains, and an unstructured...

  • Structural landscape of isolated agonist-binding domains from single AMPA receptors. Landes, Christy F.; Rambhadran, Anu; Taylor, J. Nick; Salatan, Ferandre; Jayaraman, Vasanthi // Nature Chemical Biology;Mar2011, Vol. 7 Issue 3, p168 

    AMPA receptors mediate fast excitatory neurotransmission by converting chemical signals into electrical signals, and thus it is important to understand the relationship between their chemical biology and their function. We used single-molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer to examine...

  • Fold and sequence independent protein binding sites prediction algorithm. Janezˇicˇ, Dusˇanka; Konc, Janez; Konc, Joanna Trykowska; Penca, Matej; Janezˇicˇ, Matej // AIP Conference Proceedings;Dec2012, Vol. 1504 Issue 1, p729 

    We have developed fold and sequence independent algorithm for structural similarity search in large databases of protein structures to find conserved binding regions on proteins involved in protein-protein interactions. We have used this algorithm to find conserved regions on protein surfaces...

  • A holistic in silico approach to predict functional sites in protein structures. Segura, Joan; Jones, Pamela F.; Fernandez-Fuentes, Narcis // Bioinformatics;Jul2012, Vol. 28 Issue 14, p1845 

    Motivation: Proteins execute and coordinate cellular functions by interacting with other biomolecules. Among these interactions, protein–protein (including peptide-mediated), protein–DNA and protein–RNA interactions cover a wide range of critical processes and cellular...

  • Structural interpretation of protein-protein interaction network. Katebi, Ataur R.; Kloczkowski, Andrzej; Jernigan, Robert L. // BMC Structural Biology;2010 Supplement 1, Vol. 10, Special section p1 

    Background: Currently a huge amount of protein-protein interaction data is available from high throughput experimental methods. In a large network of protein-protein interactions, groups of proteins can be identified as functional clusters having related functions where a single protein can...

  • Identification of a Cell-Bound Extracellular Protease Overproduced by Sulfolobus solfataricus in Peptide-Rich Media. Cannio, Raffaele; Catara, Giuliana; Fiume, Imma; Balestrieri, Marco; Rossi, Mosè; Palmieri, Gianna // Protein & Peptide Letters;Jan2010, Vol. 17 Issue 1, p78 

    A new protease, named SsMTP was identified from the archeon Sulfolobus solfataricus. The enzyme is associated to the cell-membrane and over-produced in response to the peptide-enriched media. SsMTP has a molecular mass of 120 kDa showing optimal activity at pH 2.0 in the temperature range 70 -...

  • Peptide segments in protein-protein interfaces. Pal, Arumay; Chakrabarti, Pinak; Bahadur, Ranjit; Rodier, Francis; Janin, Joël // Journal of Biosciences;Jan2007, Vol. 32 Issue 1, p101 

    An important component of functional genomics involves the understanding of protein association. The interfaces resulting from protein-protein interactions -- (i) specific, as represented by the homodimeric quaternary structures and the complexes formed by two independently occurring protein...

  • Identification of protein binding surfaces using surface triplet propensities. Mehio, Wissam; Kemp, Graham J. L.; Taylor, Paul; Walkinshaw, Malcolm D. // Bioinformatics;Oct2010, Vol. 26 Issue 20, p2549 

    Motivation: The ability to reliably predict protein–protein and protein–ligand interactions is important for identifying druggable binding sites and for understanding how proteins communicate. Most currently available algorithms identify cavities on the protein surface as potential...

  • Predicting binding sites of hydrolase-inhibitor complexes by combining several methods. Sen, Taner Z.; Kloczkowski, Andrzej; Jernigan, Robert L.; Changhui Yan; Honavar, Vasant; Kai-Ming Ho; Cai-Zhuang Wang; Yungok Ihm; Haibo Cao; Xun Gu; Dobbs, Drena // BMC Bioinformatics;2004, Vol. 5, p205 

    Background: Protein-protein interactions play a critical role in protein function. Completion of many genomes is being followed rapidly by major efforts to identify interacting protein pairs experimentally in order to decipher the networks of interacting, coordinated-in-action proteins....

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics