Material contribution causation in clinical negligence cases

Gibson, Christopher
November 2008
Clinical Risk;Nov2008, Vol. 14 Issue 6, p239
Academic Journal
The article focuses on material contribution causation in clinical negligence cases. It reminds people that all is not lost on behalf of the claimant if the experts cannot say that the injury would not have happened, but for the negligence. It is stated that causation in clinical negligence cases can sometimes be formidably difficult. The precise effect of one of them can be elusive, where there are a number of factors in play.


Related Articles

  • Negligent Misrepresentation: Liability for Mistakenly Saying Something False. Nelson, John // Atlanta Building News;Sep2010, Vol. 11 Issue 9, p15 

    The article discusses the liability for negligent misrepresentation in Georgia. It cites a scenario in which the engineer is sued by the buyer because of the failure to provide correct report despite the fact that the engineer is hired by the seller and never meets the buyer. It states that...

  • Eagle v Redlime Ltd. O'Grady, Eileen // EG: Estates Gazette;4/16/2011, Issue 1115, p92 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the claimant brought action for damages claiming negligence by the defendant in carrying out building works in Great Britain. In Eagle vs. Redlime Ltd., the defendant has denied liability but argued that the claim was statute-barred. The defendant...

  • You be the Judge. Schorr, José // Saturday Evening Post;8/26/1961, Vol. 234 Issue 34, p40 

    Presents a case of a baby sitter who sued her employer for negligence for their failure to warn her to watch her step while walking in their freshly waxed floor.

  • Beware of Long QT Syndrome in the ED: How Long Will You Be Liable? Heniff, Melanie; Moore, Gregory P. // ED Legal Letter;Jan2008, Vol. 19 Issue 1, p1 

    The article discusses the concepts of foreseeable consequences and proximate cause and its application in medicine. The concept of proximate cause states that a platintiff must be able to show that his injury was directly caused by the negligence or mistake of a physician. It does not put all...

  • ATRA Characterizes 2003 As 'Most Successful Year' For Enactment Of Civil Justice Reform Laws.  // Insurance Advocate;7/21/2003, Vol. 114 Issue 27, p18 

    Reports that the American Tort Reform Association cited that 2003 has been the most successful year for enactment of state civil justice reform legislation in the U.S. since 1995. Key issues of interest; Analysis of pertinent topics and relevant issues; Implications on the insurance industry.

  • CHAPTER 4: Deciding Where and Whom to Sue. Duncan, Roderic // Win Your Lawsuit (California Edition);2010, p49 

    The article discusses the factors that should be considered when filing a lawsuit. It says that a person should know first the defendant or those who have the legal responsibility on the damage and injury suffered by the plaintiff. Moreover, it mentions that one should make sure that he can sue...

  • Causation effect. Causton, Peter // Lawyer;2/7/2005, Vol. 19 Issue 5, p24 

    Focuses on the legal principles considered in the "Chester v. Afshar" case of 2004 in Great Britain. Refusal of the Court of Appeal to apply the merits of the case on "Paul Davison & Taylor v. White"; High-profile medical negligence case involved in "Chester v. Afstar"; Arguments for and against...

  • RE-TORTS. Perry, Ronen // Alabama Law Review;2008, Vol. 59 Issue 4, p987 

    The article presents information on the proposed definition of negligent conduct in the draft Restatement (Third) of Torts (Third Restatement). It embraces the Hand formula, which defines negligence in economic, cost-benefit terms. It also defends and develops the view that efficiency should not...

  • Collyer Bristow's future looks secure as it defeats Innovator One claim. Dowell, Katy // Lawyer (Online Edition);5/18/2012, p11 

    The article reports that Great Britain based firm of solicitors Collyer Bristow has defeated professional negligence claim worth 50 million pound by Innovator One. It mentions allegations of conspiracy, negligence and dishonest assistance were made against Bristow LLP. Further it mentions the...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics